What's new

Israeli minister sees possible attack on Iran "in 2-3 years"

Looking at Israel's history never in the history Israel attacked it's opponent with an announcement, they always silently attacked it's enemies while they were asleep and achieved it's objective e.g Iraq nuclear plants
I don't know whats this gimmick like giving Iran 2-3 years to fully prepare itself
In 2-3 years Iran might have hypersonic missiles , Russian jets s400 or even s500
That's how you know it's BS.

If they are talking very loudly, it means nothing will happen. It's when they are very quiet, thats when you should be alert.
 
. .
download.jpg
 
. .
*Israel blows up hundreds of Iranians in Syria and Iraq including a bunch of officers and generals, kills its top scientists, engineers and generals inside Iran*
Yeah,and how did that work out for you guys?,because it looks to me like it back fired pretty spectacularly with iran responding by producing uranium metal and 60% enrichment.
Whats the bet that another little act of israeli/western stupidity like that will get you 90% enrichment,hmmm?
Irans still in syria and with russias preoccupations with the ukraine irans role in syria is now more important than ever.
Looks to me like your desperation is showing. :azn:
 
.
1st Nuclear strike by Isreal
would get 1 major Iranian City destroyed completely
iran_map.jpg


2nd Strike by Iranian Ballistic missiles on Isreal Small Area of square meters land area would virtually allow Iran to annihilate Isreal all major Nuke sites, invasion of military forces initiate on Isreal Via Iraq Jordan Syria when they probably would allow Iranians to march on after Nuclear bomb on Iran. With Isreal insignificant population Iran would invade with ease.
Political-Map-of-Israel copy.jpg
 
.
Iran is a good 2-3 years away from building nukes. Let’s hope they build one soon enough and a concept of MAD is restored in the Middle East.

These empty rhetorics serve no one.
 
.
*Israel blows up hundreds of Iranians in Syria and Iraq including a bunch of officers and generals, kills its top scientists, engineers and generals inside Iran*
Not 100, or 1000 airstrikes or other covert activities have derailed any progress on the nuclear front.

1st Nuclear strike by Isreal
would get 1 major Iranian City destroyed completely
View attachment 910908

2nd Strike by Iranian Ballistic missiles on Isreal Small Area of square meters land area would virtually allow Iran to annihilate Isreal all major Nuke sites, invasion of military forces initiate on Isreal Via Iraq Jordan Syria when they probably would allow Iranians to march on after Nuclear bomb on Iran. With Isreal insignificant population Iran would invade with ease.
View attachment 910909
Really nice maps by the way
 
.
1st Nuclear strike by Isreal
would get 1 major Iranian City destroyed completely
View attachment 910908

2nd Strike by Iranian Ballistic missiles on Isreal Small Area of square meters land area would virtually allow Iran to annihilate Isreal all major Nuke sites, invasion of military forces initiate on Isreal Via Iraq Jordan Syria when they probably would allow Iranians to march on after Nuclear bomb on Iran. With Isreal insignificant population Iran would invade with ease.
View attachment 910909
Lol, what makes you think Iran will survive an Israeli nuclear strike?

Also ballistic missiles won't do shit Iran doesn't have enough of them to really hurt Israel and Israeli nuke sites are very deep underground

Iranian invasion because of insignificant Israeli population? LMAO that's what the Arabs said every time before we beat them
 
.
Why are you against Iranians attaining nukes?

They are quite hostile towards Pakistanis, both as a government and many people. They are closely allied with India and have ties to Shia terror groups in Pakistan.

On top of that they are a signatory to banning nukes and are also a mullah state. We might as well be okay with Saudis or the Taliban owning nukes. Simply no.

There's even an article called "why a nuclear Iran is not in Pakistan's interest."
 
.
They are quite hostile towards Pakistanis, both as a government and many people. They are closely allied with India and have ties to Shia terror groups in Pakistan.

On top of that they are a signatory to banning nukes and are also a mullah state. We might as well be okay with Saudis or the Taliban owning nukes. Simply no.

There's even an article called "why a nuclear Iran is not in Pakistan's interest."
I agree with you
 
.
I agree with you
They are quite hostile towards Pakistanis, both as a government and many people. They are closely allied with India and have ties to Shia terror groups in Pakistan.

On top of that they are a signatory to banning nukes and are also a mullah state. We might as well be okay with Saudis or the Taliban owning nukes. Simply no.

There's even an article called "why a nuclear Iran is not in Pakistan's interest."
clearly show sectarian mindset .
 
. . . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom