Israeli Air Force Gears up to Strike Iran.

[xMustiiej70]

hmm.. i see a picture of her.
she looks good.

 

[SekrutYakhni]

hmm.. i see a picture of her.
she looks good.

but she is extremely biased in her views.


Now we should not go off topic here.

 

[Solomon2]

Were you the part of Mullah team before?

No. The mullahs subverted a local muslim and had him assassinate one of my neighbors, a former diplomat of the Shah's regime.

and hands down to Israeli Justice.

Since it seems no one in Pakistan ever considers it seriously (who can boast that the Israeli viewpoint is considered?), what makes you think you should laugh?

So, you mean that the U.S. was cruel enough to use the nukes? because the U.S. chose to destroy its enemy i.e. Japan.

Look again, the Japanese are still around. The two bombs killed over 100,000 Japanese. An invasion would have killed millions - projections were over 250,000 U.S. dead and over a million Japanese. The two atomic bombings allowed the Emperor to step in and surrender. It was the easiest and most beneficial Occupation in recorded history.

 

[Parashuram1]

You cannot still justify a nuclear attack that too a first one when clearly United States had a conventional edge over imperial Japan. Don't think of me supporting the Japanese of those days, but that nuclear attack is no way justified. The Japanese had not attacked mainland United States with full force and most battle had raged in Pacific and over the skies.

Despite conventional advantage, U.S air force considered wiping out Japanese population as a warning. As for you saying the most beneficial occupation, I believe you are talking from American perspective.

The only thing that came positive out of this bombing was that the future generations realized what a nuclear bomb can do and therefore use it as a deterrent instead of lobbing it all over the world without thinking-- and this goes to all the 8 nuclear armed countries who have trigger-happy intentions.

 

[Thomas]

You cannot still justify a nuclear attack that too a first one when clearly United States had a conventional edge over imperial Japan. Don't think of me supporting the Japanese of those days, but that nuclear attack is no way justified. The Japanese had not attacked mainland United States with full force and most battle had raged in Pacific and over the skies.

Despite conventional advantage, U.S air force considered wiping out Japanese population as a warning. As for you saying the most beneficial occupation, I believe you are talking from American perspective.

The only thing that came positive out of this bombing was that the future generations realized what a nuclear bomb can do and therefore use it as a deterrent instead of lobbing it all over the world without thinking-- and this goes to all the 8 nuclear armed countries who have trigger-happy intentions.

The bombs actually saved lives. Both American and Japanese. If the U.S. would have invaded millions would have died.

 

[Kompromat]

The bombs actually saved lives. Both American and Japanese. If the U.S. would have invaded millions would have died.

So by having said that we come to an agreement that Bombs Save lives.

Now lets put this very (Your) formula on Iranian Israeli situation & lets say Iranians may have made some warheads already (Which they might have) and they put those Bombs on Til Aviv , would it save lives ??

Would it compensate the Slow Genoside and expelsion of Palestinians by Zionist Invaders ??

What do you say mr Thomas , ain't you giving Iranians an excuse that you used yourself by killing few Hundered thousand(a small number for you guys though only if its someone else) people to save the rest ?

What do you say mr Thomas ?

 

[gambit]

So by having said that we come to an agreement that Bombs Save lives.

Now lets put this very (Your) formula on Iranian Israeli situation & lets say Iranians may have made some warheads already (Which they might have) and they put those Bombs on Til Aviv , would it save lives ??

Would it compensate the Slow Genoside and expelsion of Palestinians by Zionist Invaders ??

What do you say mr Thomas , ain't you giving Iranians an excuse that you used yourself by killing few Hundered thousand(a small number for you guys though only if its someone else) people to save the rest ?

What do you say mr Thomas ?

No it would not. The reason why Fat Man and Little Boy saved lives was that they ended the war with the total defeat of Imperial Japan. The two A-bombs saved FUTURE Japanese and Allied lives...

OPERATION KETSU-GO

What Operation Ketsu-go intended was to conduct total warfare, from Japan's military to militias to citizen guerrilla forces. The Quantung Army, although defeated by the Russians, was still a formidable force, battle hardened and on the march to the home islands. The Quantung Army was the one responsible for the atrocities done to the Chinese, including the infamous 'Unit 731'. Educate yourself with those keywords. All of these factored in would have made the Allied occupation horrifically bloody, for all sides. The war would have lasted longer past 1945 as Japanese outposts throughout Asia would continue to resist and fight, making lives in Asia miserable and delaying many countries their independence from colonial rule, European and Japanese.

Would Iranian nuclear weapons effect a total defeat of Israel? Yours is a foolish speculation.

 

[Machoman]

Honestly Iran cannot face Israel power. It is may be 2 days game for Israel to take care of Iran. They have the most advance air power and technology in the world. There is no way Iran can face them. Hopefully I am wrong but Israel is at least 100 time more advance then Iran is. So….

 

[Machoman]

Do you guys think if Iran ask Pakistan to loan them some Jf-17 Is Pakistan will do it?

 

[Machoman]

I think for Iran the best deal is to buys all UAE Mirage 2000. Which are some how better then what they already have.

 

[Kompromat]

No it would not. The reason why Fat Man and Little Boy saved lives was that they ended the war with the total defeat of Imperial Japan. The two A-bombs saved FUTURE Japanese and Allied lives...

OPERATION KETSU-GO

What Operation Ketsu-go intended was to conduct total warfare, from Japan's military to militias to citizen guerrilla forces. The Quantung Army, although defeated by the Russians, was still a formidable force, battle hardened and on the march to the home islands. The Quantung Army was the one responsible for the atrocities done to the Chinese, including the infamous 'Unit 731'. Educate yourself with those keywords. All of these factored in would have made the Allied occupation horrifically bloody, for all sides. The war would have lasted longer past 1945 as Japanese outposts throughout Asia would continue to resist and fight, making lives in Asia miserable and delaying many countries their independence from colonial rule, European and Japanese.

Would Iranian nuclear weapons effect a total defeat of Israel? Yours is a foolish speculation.

Heard an interview of an Israeli General who thinks that if Til Aviv is Hit , its over of Israel.
Maybe he was Foolish too.

 

[Thomas]

Honestly Iran cannot face Israel power. It is may be 2 days game for Israel to take care of Iran. They have the most advance air power and technology in the world. There is no way Iran can face them. Hopefully I am wrong but Israel is at least 100 time more advance then Iran is. So….

In a conventional attack even if Israel accomplished all their goals. Iran would claim that they stood up to Israel and survived. Then claim victory becuase they survived Israels attack.

If they attack Gulf countries and shipping as they threaten they will do. that would change and make them the pariah. They would have a harder time taking the high road propaganda wise. At least in my opinion.

 

[SekrutYakhni]

In a conventional attack even if Israel accomplished all their goals. Iran would claim that they stood up to Israel and survived. Then claim victory becuase they survived Israels attack.

If they attack Gulf countries and shipping as they threaten they will do. that would change and make them the pariah. They would have a harder time taking the high road propaganda wise. At least in my opinion.

Yes, can you go and help Israel actively because you are posting war type things since very long. So, it is better to take part in it actively.

 

[xMustiiej70]

Isn't Iran able to take some aircraft from israel with anti aircraft sites?
s300? other missiles?
I mean israel wont send all their aircrafts.

 

[Parashuram1]

No it would not. The reason why Fat Man and Little Boy saved lives was that they ended the war with the total defeat of Imperial Japan. The two A-bombs saved FUTURE Japanese and Allied lives...

OPERATION KETSU-GO

What Operation Ketsu-go intended was to conduct total warfare, from Japan's military to militias to citizen guerrilla forces. The Quantung Army, although defeated by the Russians, was still a formidable force, battle hardened and on the march to the home islands. The Quantung Army was the one responsible for the atrocities done to the Chinese, including the infamous 'Unit 731'. Educate yourself with those keywords. All of these factored in would have made the Allied occupation horrifically bloody, for all sides. The war would have lasted longer past 1945 as Japanese outposts throughout Asia would continue to resist and fight, making lives in Asia miserable and delaying many countries their independence from colonial rule, European and Japanese.

Would Iranian nuclear weapons effect a total defeat of Israel? Yours is a foolish speculation.

Don't you think by writing the bolder part, you are making your current military stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan look like fools? 8 years, thousands of deaths, no significant result, covert support from fundamentalist hardliners continues to go to the terrorists hidden there etc.

Would you prescribe a similar solution as Hiroshima and Nagasaki to these two countries as well?

Others have a point when they (from their perspective) ask you whether this solution is apt for any two countries in this case Iran and Israel where either of them initiates a nuclear raid on the other to quickly make his enemy surrender. After all, unlike Afghanistan and Iraq where militants are the problem, Israel perceives the Iranian government as the problem and not the people, isn't it?