What's new

ISRAEL PREPARES GROUND INVASION OF SYRIA

.
What do you guys think is benefit for russia here ? I mean they must to do it to get something in return by the way ?

What I strongly believe that many Muslim Countries, excluding Saudi Arabia, has requested Putin that he must lead his forces in order to confront ISIS, we all know that; lets say if Turkey jumps into the battle tomorrow everyone will start criticizing her and Turkey will have a bad relations with Saudi Arabia, US and few other western Countries. And Russia on the other hand is a Super Power and has the ability to lead these kinda operations. As far as ground forces are concerned, Muslim world can than simply send 1000 each without a problem, because no one can know neither can guess about the actual ground reality. This is the only reason we haven't heard any opposition from any other Muslim Country in the world except Saudi Arabia. And if Israel and Saudi Arabia and USA are on the same page i-e criticizing Russia for attacks than their must be something real serious going on in Syria and Iraq.
 
.
Should give Syria some tanks and helos.
Not everyone works like America giving/ selling 1 set of people weapons and then another set followed by another...building an empire on the blood of people :tsk:
 
.
Not everyone works like America giving/ selling 1 set of people weapons and then another set followed by another...building an empire on the blood of people :tsk:

No, I'm just asking China to work harder. Since Chinese small arms like anti tank weapons and MANPADs is not enough in Syria.
 
. .
Pack of Wolves feasting on the corpse of Syria from all sides.Its a free for all now.

It wouldn't become a 'corpse' if 10 countries had not decided to send in arms and terrorists to Syria only to topple its leader whom they didn't like. No matter how 'bad' the regime was, everyone who had visited Syria would admit what a beautiful and peaceful country it was before. Imagine if India bordered 5 countries and an internal unrest had started, what would would happen if those 5 countries fueled it by providing all kinds of cash and arms and opening their borders to allow terrorists in? Would it help?

That's exactly what Turkey, Saudis, Qatar, west another terror supporting nations did in Syria. You have a lunatic leading Turkey called Erdogan, who is wishing day and night for 5 years to pray in Damascus mosque, 'free' from Assad, along with his Muslim Brother hood criminal gang. You have GCC with a lot of oil money, a great portion of which goes to terrorist groups all over the world. Then you have a hypocrite west where they support 'rebels' in the name of freedom and democracy, but sanction Russia when that same thing happens with their coup government in Ukraine.

Give Iran and Russia, 2 of Syria's allies, one reason not to intervene. They think they can arm terrorists and get away with it? That's not the case. No one is happy seeing what's happening in Syria, but when you have countries, as political backward as Saudi Arabia, having audacity to actually openly say Assad has to go, while they select their own leaders through 'sperm process' and are a much worse dictatorship than Syria ever was, you know the problem is not easy to handle, all at the same time when Saudis are killing and terrorizing Yemeni civilians on a daily basis. Few days ago, they killed 131 people in wedding in Yemen, did you see one single condemnation from western countries and piss activists? Did you even hear the news?
 
. .
That is what the article is pointing at and if someone does stop them it will be a repeat of WW 2...everyone wants a piece of land, everyone wants to use and test their weapons....and no one cares of the innocents who are dying ....only in this case a few million became refugees before this started instead of in between the whole mess!
those innocents are the first responsible for all this . Syrians are changing president since 5 years like this way?:D
 
.
those innocents are the first responsible for all this . Syrians are changing president since 5 years like this way?:D
and when exactly were they able to choose one without a foreigner throwing in an unknown foreign graduated and bought puppet?
 
.
It wouldn't become a 'corpse' if 10 countries had not decided to send in arms and terrorists to Syria only to topple its leader whom they didn't like. No matter how 'bad' the regime was, everyone who had visited Syria would admit what a beautiful and peaceful country it was before. Imagine if India bordered 5 countries and an internal unrest had started, what would would happen if those 5 countries fueled it by providing all kinds of cash and arms and opening their borders to allow terrorists in? Would it help?

That's exactly what Turkey, Saudis, Qatar, west another terror supporting nations did in Syria. You have a lunatic leading Turkey called Erdogan, who is wishing day and night for 5 years to pray in Damascus mosque, 'free' from Assad, along with his Muslim Brother hood criminal gang. You have GCC with a lot of oil money, a great portion of which goes to terrorist groups all over the world. Then you have a hypocrite west where they support 'rebels' in the name of freedom and democracy, but sanction Russia when that same thing happens with their coup government in Ukraine.

Give Iran and Russia, 2 of Syria's allies, one reason not to intervene. They think they can arm terrorists and get away with it? That's not the case. No one is happy seeing what's happening in Syria, but when you have countries, as political backward as Saudi Arabia, having audacity to actually openly say Assad has to go, while they select their own leaders through 'sperm process' and are a much worse dictatorship than Syria ever was, you know the problem is not easy to handle, all at the same time when Saudis are killing and terrorizing Yemeni civilians on a daily basis. Few days ago, they killed 131 people in wedding in Yemen, did you see one single condemnation from western countries and piss activists? Did you even hear the news?
All kinds of interventions aside, who advised Syrian Leader Bashar Al-Assad to massacre civilians who demanded change in Syrian leadership?

You condemn Saudi Arabian leadership setup, yet you fail to see the same in Syria. First, Hafez Al-Assad ruled Syria for 30 years and then his son Bashar Al-Assad came to power and rules Syria with iron fist. Point is that when a large segment of society voices its dissatisfaction against government, it is the responsibility of the government to pay attention and address its concerns instead of ordering the army to attack it.

Bashar would really make his father proud. He is alive because Russians and Iranians (your nation) came to his aid to save his sorry @ss. I hope that a Republican President comes and smokes this piece of shit.
 
. . . .
Muslims are here to fight and die they have nothing else to do
Well it seems they arent given any chance....But no one will point out who is provoking them or even using their banners while not even being Muslim themselves!
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom