What's new

ISRAEL PREPARES GROUND INVASION OF SYRIA

Poor Syria everyone is using their fate as a reason to test their weapons or go to war....Trigger happy rascals!


Sometimes I feel it was pre planned to make middle east imbalance to give reason to a certain trigger happy nation to flex their muscle!

After all ISIS managed to malign Islam, kill Muslims, and capture a Muslim nation, kick out its people (Syrian refugee) - all loss was on the Muslims so how can ISIS even be called Muslim when it is doing EVERYTHING AGAINST the Muslims?

Who is benefiting such shit? Only people who needed a reason to invade! Or a people who need to test/ sell their weapons - a joint venture between the biggest mischief makers on the planet!

You have your version of Islam, they have their's. "No true Scotsman" arguments are not going to refute the fact that in their eyes (and in the eyes of their supporters), they are on the right side.

All the reason ISRAEL is looking for....

They are actually looking for a reason to kill ....like Syria isnt already suffering we need trigger happy brainwashed idiots coming in!

Israel is already claiming it is going into Syria to defend its borders from Hezbollah!

Be there Hezbollah or not the screaming child we call Israel has already started its tantrum!

Israelis don't scream all that much. Watch some videos of Palestinian women spewing venom against the Yehudi. Now THEY scream, a lot.
 
.
What percentage of Syrian population showed their 'dissatisfaction'? Do you have any evidence to prove they were the majority? An armed opposition is not a proof of that. In a country of 23 million, even if 5 million are against regime, they can create a huge armed group. What percentage of Syrians want Assad to be toppled militarily? How does that give right to foreigners to arm, fund and send terrorists to Syria? Based on that logic, Iran has a right to send arms to all kinds of Pakistani militants if we don't like its gov.

Here's a recent poll conducted in Syria. It speaks a lot.

capture-png.258009




What you wish means little on the ground. Despite the huge propaganda that tells the story that protests were fully 'peaceful' in Syria in the beginning, on the fifth day that protests started in Syria, terrorists attacked a gov building and killed 5 policemen. When a 'peaceful' protest starts like this, it's not hard to guess how it goes on. Syria had always a problem with its Muslim brotherhood terrorists for decades, just like Egypt and Jordan. Assad did a mistake of releasing many terrorists from prisons in 2011 to appease some protesters, now those released prisoners are leaders and members of various terrorist groups in Syria, from ISIS to Nusra and Islamic front.
Its always the minority, even saying 5 million is to much, you only need a few thousand armed people to "revolt" to completely destroy a country.
 
.
Can you expand on how would they get the nukes? Just speculate.

AFAIK only countries which have nukes are US, UK, Russia, France, China, Pakistan, India, Israel and may be N. Korea

Have their been any statements from ISIS regarding this?

North Korea definitely has nukes, they have tested them a few times.

How much would it take to buy one? North Korea regularly threatens to nuke America and South Korea anyway (they do this about once a month), I doubt they would worry about who is on the receiving end.

North Korea threatens US with nuclear attack | Daily Mail Online

North Korea threatens to 'leave no Americans alive' - The Independent

It's not like they are hiding their intentions.
 
.
North Korea definitely has nukes, they have tested them a few times.

How much would it take to buy one? North Korea regularly threatens to nuke America and South Korea anyway (they do this about once a month), I doubt they would worry about who is on the receiving end.

North Korea threatens US with nuclear attack | Daily Mail Online

North Korea threatens to 'leave no Americans alive' - The Independent

It's not like they are hiding their intentions.

Edit: Isn't the only power backing N. Korea China? BTW ISIS has made it clear whom they would approach for Nukes.

So I don't think we ought to worry on that front - as all possible suppliers are very much under China's sphere of influence and China is a responsible global power - right?
 
.
Edit: Isn't the only power backing N. Korea China? BTW ISIS has made it clear whom they would approach for Nukes.

So I don't think we ought to worry on that front - as all possible suppliers are very much under China's sphere of influence and China is a responsible global power - right?

LOL you think China can control where North Korea sells its nukes to?

We can't even get them to come to the Six-party talks. Did you hear about Fat Kim's Uncle who was supposedly friendly to China? He got fed to the dogs.

And ISIS has made numerous claims about smuggling a nuke into the USA:

Islamic State Nuclear Weapons: ISIS Claims It Can Smuggle Devices Through Nigeria, Mexico To The United States

Though they are not quite as brash as North Korea in their statements on this matter. But their intentions certainly align.
 
.
Still hopeful we can test this baby in Syria. Seems a good/worthy opponent has finally turn up in Syria.:D

3146648

UAV-Teranis.jpg

uks-future-version-of-the-x-47b-bae-taranis-ucav-raven-38.jpg


:angel:
 
.
Like I said, Kim Jong-Un's Uncle was known for being "friendly to China" and the result was that he was fed to the dogs.

We can't control anything about North Korea. If we could have then their economy would have been reformed decades ago.

I don't understand why are we talking about N. Korea anymore as ISIS themselves prefer an alternate supplier.
 
.
I don't understand why are we talking about N. Korea anymore as ISIS themselves prefer an alternate supplier.

Because both IS and North Korea have OPENLY stated many times that they wish to attack America with nuclear weapons.

And North Korea is a country that is completely outside the international system, they can sell whatever they want to whomever they choose.

Completely different from what you are suggesting. Pakistan is in fact a major non-NATO ally in the War on Terror, and is a significant player within the international system. They have accountability, something which NK does not have.
 
.
Because both IS and North Korea have OPENLY stated many times that they wish to attack America with nuclear weapons.

And North Korea is a country that is completely outside the international system, they can sell whatever they want to whomever they choose.

Completely different from what you are suggesting.

Common don't give ideas to ISIS they are monsters as they are - together with N. Korea they will be altogether another brand of crazy.

AFAIK what you are suggesting is not possible due to many difficulties chief of which is variance between geography of N. Korea and ISIS which makes logistics a nightmare. ISIS and N. Korea again have no common ideology and doubt there are any ISIS sympathizers in N. Korea - atleast not that anyone has heard.

On the other hand loads of Nations hate US - that doesn't suggest that they collaborate actively against US.
 
.
Common don't give ideas to ISIS they are monsters as they are - together with N. Korea they will be altogether another brand of crazy.

AFAIK what you are suggesting is not possible due to many difficulties chief of which is variance between geography of N. Korea and ISIS which makes logistics a nightmare. ISIS and N. Korea again have no common ideology and doubt there are any ISIS sympathizers in N. Korea - atleast not that anyone has heard.

On the other hand loads of Nations hate US - that doesn't suggest that they collaborate actively against US.

You asked me a question, and I answered it by listing the possibilities that I think are more likely than others.

That was never my point though.

My point is that Assad cares about his own survival, if he somehow gets a nuke he isn't going to start firing it randomly, because he will die as well.

IS on the other hand, they are suicide bombers by mentality, and they believe we are living in the End times. Their seizure of specific territories right now is not based on strategic value but rather it is based on End times prophecies. Their goal is to facilitate the End times.

So if they get their hands on a nuke, there is literally nothing to stop them from using it right away.

Assad at least is driven by a sense of self-preservation which follows understandable rules of logic, he doesn't want to die himself. IS don't care about their own survival, they care about ushering in the End times.
 
. .
You asked me a question, and I answered it.

That was never my point though.

My point is that Assad cares about his own survival, if he somehow gets a nuke he isn't going to start firing it randomly, because he will die as well.

IS on the other hand, they are suicide bombers by mentality, and they believe we are living in the End times. Their seizure of specific territories right now is not based on strategic value but rather it is based on End times prophecies. Their goal is to facilitate the End times.

So if they get their hands on a nuke, there is literally nothing to stop them from using it right away.

Assad at least is driven by a sense of self-preservation which follows understandable rules of logic, he doesn't want to die himself. IS don't care about their own survival, they care about ushering in the End times.

Au contraire they care very much about surviving and establishing their Caliphate. They just like to project themselves as suicidal crazy maniacs. Works well for propaganda.
 
.
.
My godness 6 pages of discussion on some nutjob Alex Jones fantasy.

Now since you are here. :D

Please tell me which rebels are getting medical treatment from Israelis ? Not all Rebels are good for u right? and which are the good ones. :)
 
.
Au contraire they care very much about surviving and establishing their Caliphate. They just like to project themselves as suicidal crazy maniacs. Works well for propaganda.

I don't know where this ISIS and nukes come from. lol Don't even see the point in arguing over such a news since its obviously bullshit.

Coming back to topic at hand, This news is simply unfeasible, since i don't see Israel launching a full scale ground invasion of Syria, unless its threatened and attacked. Even so, if it did come under attack, it will simply move in deeper towards Syria's border in Golan height, so it can have more space/buffer in Syria between it and its opponents in Syria, but there will obviously be no full scale invasion of Syria by Israel, NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom