So finally people have started realizing the emotions don't win wars, strategy and perseverance do, whether it takes 20 odd years to achieve something.
In those 20 years, don't sign an agreement on any more land handover.. but try to get women and small children migrated from there, get educated, raise a very intelligent new generation that becomes leaders scientists, chemists, writers etc.
Gazans have an impressive literacy rate.. over 90%. They can make a better strategy than Af Talibs, who are successful in eventually kicking out NATO from Afghanistan. The brain behind that was Pakistan though.
Palestinians need to consult countries like Pakistan, which are able to avoid terrorist tag despite kicking the butts of NATO while providing them corridors.. THIS IS WHAT I CALL STRATEGY... THAT WINS WARS FOR YOU.. ROCKETS, MISSILES, EVEN AIRFORCES, DON'T.
If Israel wants further land, let them have it.. without compromising on the ownership.. constantly remind them that the whole land is a Palestinian land.. there is not an inch of Israeli land in that region. They can go fcuk themselves in Poland or Austria where they have come from.
What is a two state solution?? It's nothing other than giving up. Don't give up your right..
RETREAT IS PART OF WAR WHEN DONE AT THE RIGHT TIME.
This is a strategy that Hamas doesn't realize. Their rockets, while justified to an extent, aren't helping them. It's just an excuse for Israel to destroy more, and more, Palestinian infrastructure and kill scores until subjugation.
But, there are two primary concerns.
1. On one hand, there is always fear that if the issue is allowed to linger on without confrontation, it will be forgotten and the world will simply accept it to be, which is what's happening. Leave it further, and the issue might dissolve completely for the West.
But, perhaps they shouldn't care about the West anymore. The Arabs had an unprecedented opportunity to take back Palestinian land in 1967 when no one even stood up for Israel, the USSR backed Arabs with intelligence and military equipment which was superior in number. Yet, the military strategy, training and coordination was so bad, Egypt, Jordan and Syria were defeated and Israel came to the banks of the Suez canal growing 3x in size.
2. Israelis know well, they won't allow any cease fire or negotiations unless it involves the disarmament, and demilitarization, of the Palestinians. Look at West Bank, it's divided into 3 zones, 1 is under complete Israeli authority, 2 is under joint security arrangements, while 3 is the only one under PLO, and their only ability is to patrol as a police force. The Israelis don't even allow PLO to work as a police force in the whole of West Bank.
So the question arises, even if Hamas were to back down at this point, how would they build up military power and might to take on a very stubborn Israel. You can produce scientists, an educated population, and so on and so forth, but that won't stpop Israel from preventing military armament and choking Palestine when it comes to it.
The buildup of military strength needs to be outside Palestine where Israel will be less hesitant to strike. You absolutely need Egypt, Jordan and Syria on board for that. Without these countries, there is no long term military solution to the conflict either.
CHINESE...
Without huge natural resources, they were able to transform completely in 50 years. I have seen that time when most of them used bicycles to travel. Now they have largest rail network.
They are giving the US hard time in every field.
The Chinese military buildup at the same time could not be contained or kept in check by any country.
The vice versa is not true for Palestine.