What's new

ISLAMIC DEFENCE AGENCY

Presence of nukes on both sides :):)

Its still present... what's the difference anyway..

Nobody sensible will ever think of using it.. Its just a deterrent..
 
Its still present... what's the difference anyway..

Nobody sensible will ever think of using it.. Its just a deterrent..

I think you don't understand why this standoff happens........Of course due to NUKES

Of course no sensible will ever think of using them:cheers:
 
I think you don't understand why this standoff happens........Of course due to NUKES

Of course no sensible will ever think of using them:cheers:

No i still dont understand why stand off happens because of nukes..

so only nuclear countries have stand off??

Or is it there was no stand offs before both our countries had nukes??
 
No i still dont understand why stand off happens because of nukes..

so only nuclear countries have stand off??

Or is it there was no stand offs before both our countries had nukes??

this is a special case bro :cheers:
You have a policy of NO first use
But fortunately
We have no such type of policy.....
As you are superior in conventional war to us (in numbers and a little in tech too) so a war at that time could be the worst case scenario

As kargil happens just 2-1/2 year before

Nuclear doctrine of Pakistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Dear members, i am creating this thread to discuss the problem and prospect of different muslim countries co- operation in research and development on defence equipment to be produce in muslim countries . the goal is to reduce reliance on other non muslim country's and uses our own man power and resources so that our resources evolve between our self .
Nothing wrong with that..Europe is already doing something like that on the basis of geography and probably religion...They have huddled together and everybody else is in the exclusion zone...Muslim countries can do the same,and find a similarity,that will be religion,or probably geographic location,as most Muslim countries are located in and around Middle Asia..The EU laws prohibit companies from outside EU to come to EU and establish business,same with people from outside EU to come in and find employment...Priority is given to businesses and personnel from within EU.Same can be done among Muslim countries,along same lines.They too should banish all those foreign corporate giants who are controlling all business in their countries..That will give opportunity to local businesses to flourish and prosper,and the money will remain in their hands.
 
this is a special case bro :cheers:
You have a policy of NO first use
But fortunately
We have no such type of policy.....
As you are superior in conventional war to us (in numbers and a little in tech too) so a war at that time could be the worst case scenario

As kargil happens just 2-1/2 year before

Nuclear doctrine of Pakistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who will care about policies at time of war, people will be more interested in life insurance policies..

Anyway having a no first use policy is saying we will use it no matter what..

And US and Pakistan have nt abide to no first use policies, while china and India says they have no first use policy..
 
Quite contradictory. please clarify you wanna assert who is defensive either we or you.

Where is the defensiveness in my post? I am saying India has a large population. Even Turkey, Iran and Pakistan and Central Asian states combined population doesn't come any closer to Indias'. Any large state entering the alliance has potential to disrupt it and make it non functional as has happened in the case of SAARC, so these alliances should be made between small and medium sized states only. I wouldn't mind if even Armenia and Israel wants to join us as long as they resolve their issues with the Turks and Palestinians respectively. As for GCC arabs, I don't think they want to align with poorer countries then themselves so there won't be any point in trying to convince them. Once a small alliance becomes successful others will want to join it too and it can be expanded.
 
Nothing wrong with that..Europe is already doing something like that on the basis of geography and probably religion...They have huddled together and everybody else is in the exclusion zone...Muslim countries can do the same,and find a similarity,that will be religion,or probably geographic location,as most Muslim countries are located in and around Middle Asia..The EU laws prohibit companies from outside EU to come to EU and establish business,same with people from outside EU to come in and find employment...Priority is given to businesses and personnel from within EU.Same can be done among Muslim countries,along same lines.They too should banish all those foreign corporate giants who are controlling all business in their countries..That will give opportunity to local businesses to flourish and prosper,and the money will remain in their hands.

The European union lie in the same geography and they r still heavily cooperating with other world(if the intension of such an organization is to reduce the dependency help from outside),moreover EU is not formed on any religious line,it is basically a cooperation of the numerous country lying in a sphere to convert it into a mini village

How this is possible in Muslim world,half of ur nation's dont see eye to eye,what about the immigration rules,is each and every country ready to accept a single currency,such a scenario can be possible in Arab world,but not in Muslim world
 
you ppl obvioulsy have too much time on your hands to discuss topics like these.:)
 
this is a special case bro :cheers:
You have a policy of NO first use
But fortunately
We have no such type of policy.....
As you are superior in conventional war to us (in numbers and a little in tech too) so a war at that time could be the worst case scenario

As kargil happens just 2-1/2 year before

Nuclear doctrine of Pakistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding no-first-use.

India adopted a "no first use policy" after its nuclear tests in 1998. India's nuclear policy currently states that even though there will be no first-use of nuclear weapons by India, "nuclear retaliation to a first strike will be massive and designed to inflict unacceptable damage"

If there is a no-first-use policy, that means India has credible second strike capability even if it's complete structure not known to the public.

And Btw, there is no where written that no-first-use cannot be withdrawn at any time as you like. So, you should not bank too much on Indian no-first-use policy.
 
Firstly,

Why Islamic Defence Agency???

What do you need a defence from???

Secondly,

Why Islamic Defence Agency???

Is the religion as a whole under threat???What is the role of religion here??What about the role and life of people belonging to other religion???

Thirdly,

Why Islamic Defence Agency???

What is the necessity of an agency for the defence of Islam or followers of Islam??I think it is the role of the state to protect and see to the welfare of its citizens.Also at the same time,isnt it kind of unfair from the view point of humanity to look after the followers of Islam in particular and ignore the other fellow human beings in general???
 
The European union lie in the same geography and they r still heavily cooperating with other world(if the intension of such an organization is to reduce the dependency help from outside),moreover EU is not formed on any religious line,it is basically a cooperation of the numerous country lying in a sphere to convert it into a mini village

How this is possible in Muslim world,half of ur nation's dont see eye to eye,what about the immigration rules,is each and every country ready to accept a single currency,such a scenario can be possible in Arab world,but not in Muslim world

Think again...
Why do you think that far way islands such as cyprus and Malta are included in EU..But Turkey is still not accepted?
 
Back
Top Bottom