ISI success against CIA Secret War by Zaheerul Hassan

[hunter_hunted]

Its no doubt now that only our brave visible soldiers and invisible soldiers are protecting this land

This is the Blessing of Allah.

Pakistan zindabad, Pakistan army zindabad.

 

[Zaheerul Hassan]

ISI infact defeated CIA,RAW & Mossad.ISI only defended her country against already mentioned 3 sisters agencies.

 

[Zaheerul Hassan]

Its no doubt now that only our brave visible soldiers and invisible soldiers are protecting this land

This is the Blessing of Allah.

Pakistan zindabad, Pakistan army zindabad.

We are proud of our Army and ISI

 

[arcane]

when did i say ISI was linked to mumbai attacks, even the admins are stupid.....

 

[FireFighter]

i don't understand how can anybody celebrate successes of a failed agency like ISI, they may miniature successes but they have mammoth failures.......notable among them are David Headly and OBL.......moreover, ISI has been linked with a murder of a journalist, which defeats its purpose of secretive operation......i don't understand why people still think it is a strong agency......

No, give credit where its due. Major failures by the Army make the ISI successes look miniatue. I strongly believe had raymond davis not been released for at least a year, OBL raid wouldnt have taken place. Releasing Davis was a major blunder by the Kayani n co n punjab govn't, not ISI. Credit goes to low-mid level officiers who do the work but hardly ever make it to the top.

Can you name any other secret service in the world that has made an American Chief of Army like Gen Mike Mullen n CIA chief Panetta lose their pants before a senate hearing?

 

[lem34]

Its easy to be critical of PA & ISI without knowing the full story. But I think the fact that America and west have been demonizing them suggests to me that they are not following the West diktat. I mean I don't seem to hear the same criticism from west about Zardari etc. Afte all if they were giving in and were a western asset why would the west be crying so much???

 

[Thorough Pro]

We Pakistanis must never forget the role and tireless work of these unknown patriots working in ISI and army to protect Pakistan.

We salute Pakistani defence forces and Intelligence agencies. May Allah Help them to help protect this nation.

 

[arcane]

No, give credit where its due. Major failures by the Army make the ISI successes look miniatue. I strongly believe had raymond davis not been released for at least a year, OBL raid wouldnt have taken place. Releasing Davis was a major blunder by the Kayani n co n punjab govn't, not ISI. Credit goes to low-mid level officiers who do the work but hardly ever make it to the top.

Can you name any other secret service in the world that has made an American Chief of Army like Gen Mike Mullen n CIA chief Panetta lose their pants before a senate hearing?

u didn't get my point, Davis was captured after he killed two policemen, had he not done so, he wouldn't have been arrested, moreover, when pakistan knew that the guy in custody was a spy, what was the need of making his custody public, spies are caught everywhere and no one comes to know about it, so it was the failure of ISI......

OBL raid was definitely ISI failure as they couldn't find him out sitting so deep inside pakistan......

i don't about which senate hearing u are talking about kindly elaborate......

 

[lem34]

u didn't get my point, Davis was captured after he killed two policemen, had he not done so, he wouldn't have been arrested, moreover, when pakistan knew that the guy in custody was a spy, what was the need of making his custody public, spies are caught everywhere and no one comes to know about it, so it was the failure of ISI......

OBL raid was definitely ISI failure as they couldn't find him out sitting so deep inside pakistan......

i don't about which senate hearing u are talking about kindly elaborate......

in the first case maybe it was a deliberate ploy to release details about Davies to get people to object to american presence. who knows how secret services work?

Obama in his first announcement said that they would not have been able to get Osama without information supplied by Pakistan

Lastly I don't seem to see Indians being happy with our ISI, if they were that bad surely your lot would be happier. In any event I think Indians judging our ISI have ulterior motives.

Anyway for me as a Pakistani its sufficient that America and India who are Pakistan's enemies hate ISI, they must be doing something right

 

[lem34]

hmm ok, lets say it was a plan of ISI, then also the plan failed which is a failure of the agency......

secondly, US found out about OBL, they had plan to enter pakistan whenever they wanted, they got all the on site assets and they executed their plan and got OBL.....if thats not failure, then what is???

and we don't hate cos its so good, we hate cos they support terrorism....

No in my book they may have taken advantage of a situation not of their own making. Who knows not you nor I.

No Obama stated that they only captured Obama with the assistance of information from Pakistan. This is what I mean about the likes of you judging our ISI, you choose rather conveniently to ignore that significant point.

Lastly this nugget that ISI support terrorism. You have no evidence and as far as I can see SK was right in an earlier post you are off topic and like a little mouse running round and round with your speculations

 

[fd24]

hmm ok, lets say it was a plan of ISI, then also the plan failed which is a failure of the agency......

secondly, US found out about OBL, they had plan to enter pakistan whenever they wanted, they got all the on site assets and they executed their plan and got OBL.....if thats not failure, then what is???

and we don't hate cos its so good, we hate cos they support terrorism....

I am sick to the teeth of trolls like you coming onto PDF and without an ounce of evidence making sweeping statements of the ISI supporting terrorism. Stop the troll attitude. Either post hard core unquivical evidence of this or stop the obsession. Why are you posting rubbish. After all the sacrifices our nation has made on the war on terror - a global internet muppet comes on here suggesting ISI supports terrorism? The truth of the matter is it eeks and depresses the likes of you knowing you are dealing with such a hard core proffessional quality outfit that is feared as well as respected all over the world - so just get over it.

 

[arcane]

No in my book they may have taken advantage of a situation not of their own making. Who knows not you nor I.

No Obama stated that they only captured Obama with the assistance of information from Pakistan. This is what I mean about the likes of you judging our ISI, you choose rather conveniently to ignore that significant point.

Lastly this nugget that ISI support terrorism. You have no evidence and as far as I can see SK was right in an earlier post you are off topic and like a little mouse running round and round with your speculations

idk who's SK......

who knows not u nor I......clearly indicates u can't disprove my point......

Obama said it, thats Ok, but OBL killing served US interests, not pakistani, and as far as I know, ISI is under pakistani government.....it did not serve any pakistani interest in that whole operation, hence, again, failure......

 

[lem34]

idk who's SK......

who knows not u nor I......clearly indicates u can't disprove my point......

..

No more so than you can prove it

 

[arcane]

No more so than you can prove it

u very conveniently decided not to include my last statement....makes it clear u are running out of arguments....

 

[fd24]

idk who's SK......

who knows not u nor I......clearly indicates u can't disprove my point......

Obama said it, thats Ok, but OBL killing served US interests, not pakistani, and as far as I know, ISI is under pakistani government.....it did not serve any pakistani interest in that whole operation, hence, again, failure......

I respectfully reqest you again prove your early insinuation and give me evidence of the link with ISI and terrorism and you again are unable to provide 1 piece of evidence..... a great big fail again. Either prove or stop the troll. Can you now provide evidence and not "as far as i know"?? I eagerly wait your answer....