You instinctively converted the world community into USA and also generalized the specifics I was trying to point by involving all kinds of cases.
Yes, that was on purpose, because you bharatis over and over claim that the 'whole world' thinks this way or that way about Pakistan. The claim that the whole world thinks about Pakistan in the way you claim is not true. A few western countries and Bharat do not add up to the whole world.
And US invasion of Iraq for oil is not a conspiracy theory to me. But oil, while may have been the core reason, was definitely not the facilitator of Iraq war, it was the fascist rein of Saddam Hussein. He gave enough reasons to the international community to throw him off and Pakistan is kind of heading towards the same direction. When the international community would feel that a nuclear powered nation is falling to rogue/extremists, they will surely come in.
Fascism rein or such was not the official reason to start the war. When you start a war, you have to give a reason. The reason here was WMDs.
Transit route for China is in fact a bigger reason one could start a war than Iraqi oil. Combine that with the fact that both Balochistan is extremely rich in natural resources.
Nevertheless, I gave a list of about 10 or so countries. The fact that you only discussed one says it all really. What about Venezeula? What treasures does it have? Zimbabwe? Cuba? And the rest of the countries in the list.
You seem to have the overly overly simplistic notion that if a country does not have some resource then anyone making accusations against it must be making accusations that are true.
I am basically trying to pin down two points here.
1. A country does not need have a "treasure trove" for other countries to want to spread propaganda against.
2. But nevertheless, if you consider Iraqi oil a "treasure trove" then Balochistan's resources combined with Pakistan being a transit route for China is a much bigger treasure trove.
It has nothing to do with me in a direct way. It is your country and your institutions and if you would rather choose to blind yourself from extremists taking hold of your country, good luck with that. I expressed my views just to tilt the balance towards potential truth.
Of course it has nothing to do with you in a direct way, except that you spread your propaganda based on oversimplistic ideas, that we must accept the accusations based on no proof but rather the (false) claim that US has nothing to gain by spreading propaganda against Pakistan.
I am afraid you're the one blinding yourself and expressed your views to tilt the balance toward propaganda.
And US wants to disarm Pakistan of nuclear arms because it threatens Israel is a laughable opinion. Pakistan is no threat to Israel.
Ask Israelis themselves privately.
Also, as I said, what about pressuring Pakistan to go into Waziristan? Pakistan - in particular Balochistan - acting as a transit route for China? Those are bigger reasons than Iraqi oil. So there you go. Even though your thoughts were overly simplistic, they were still false.
Like video recordings and ISI testimony? My best wishes to you.
Video recordings is not the only way of getting physical evidence. Arrest an ISI official during his act and get him to admit it.
But this is what I find interesting is the utter, utter hypocrisy from some bharatis. They expect us to provide them proof, but what do we have here? Oh no, proof is hard to get, you must accept our accusation based on conspiracy theories and rhetoric.