Developereo
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2009
- Messages
- 14,093
- Reaction score
- 25
- Country
- Location
Jews were fighting for their survival after being attacked by the Arabs. Jews prevailed so some Arabs left.
We're going in circles.
The population was predominantly, almost entirely, Arab for centuries. Beginning in 1888, waves of Jewish migration increased Jewish population, legitimately, to about 7%. At that point, the colonial masters, at the Zionists' behest, declared that the area would become a "Jewish State". The vast majority (93%) Arabs rejected that colonial imposition, and the Jews used military force to establish their colonial estate.
Where your lack of education seems to fail you, is that population does not equal entitlement.
For example, 1 Jew legally purchasing half of Palestine, is entitiled to half of Palestine no matter how many Arabs are on it.
With Arab breeding rates, they outnumbered Jews (not in Jerusalem though pre48)
However, their population size was taken into consideration, as larger populations need more space. This is why the Arabs were offered 78% in the original partition plan.
The greed of the Arabs meant they wanted 100% and went to war.
A war they lost.
Now could you pack up your bags and get out of Australia please. You are occupying Aboriginal land.
Why do you insist on showcasing your ignorance?
Even Jewish land ownership didn't exceed 7% at the time of the Balfour declaration.
So, with less than 7% population and less than 7% land ownership, somehow the land was deemed a "Jewish State"?
Also, I am not sure what kind of democracy they teach in Israel, but in modern democracies, it is one man (or woman) one vote, not one acre one vote. Land ownership was the ancient determinant of democracy, not in the modern world.