What's new

Is India's Main Battle Tank Finally Doomed?

Maarkhoor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Messages
17,051
Reaction score
36
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
thediplomat_2015-06-17_20-21-25-386x173.jpg

Last week, the Indian Army released a global request for information (RFI) inviting responses by 31 July to develop a multi-purpose Future Ready Combat Vehicle (FRCV) in order to replace older license-built Soviet-era main-battle tanks (MBTs).

“The Indian Army is planning to design and develop a new generation, state-of-the-art combat vehicle platform for populating its armored fighting vehicle fleet in the coming decade. This vehicle, which will be called the future ready combat vehicle (FRCV), will form the base platform for the main battle tank which is planned to replace the existing T-72 tanks in the Armored Corps,” the RFI reads.

The Indian military envisions the FRCV system as a platform for as many as 11 different tracked vehicles, including light tracked, wheeled, bridge layer and trawl tanks, self-propelled howitzers (SPH), air defense guns, artillery observation post and engineering reconnaissance vehicles, and armored ambulances.

Additionally, the RFI notes that the FRCV “should be in the ‘Medium Tank’ category” and should “match contemporary MBTs in engagement ranges, all weather day/night fighting capability, depth of penetration and variety of ammunition.” The Indian Army wants the new FRCV ready for induction by 2025-27 – a deadline that almost certainly will have to be extended given India’s defense procurement track record.

Consequently, in the meantime, India will do well to continue upgrade its 1900 strong T-72 MBT force. As I noted in a previous article (“Breakdown: What’s Happening With India’s Tank Force?”), New Delhi has so far failed to successfully mass-produce an indigenously developed modern main battle tank.

The recent RFI could also very well ring the final death-knell for India’s indigenously developed third generation Arjun MK-I main battle tank – a poorly designed vehicle (e.g., too much heavy armor versus too little horsepower) that encountered repeated delays due to a flawed procurement and testing process. Almost eighty percent of the 124-strong Arjun MK-I tank force is currently grounded due to more than 90 technical issues.

India has been working on an improved version of the Arjun, the MK-II, which has done very well in comparative trials with license-built Russian tanks such as the T-90M. It displays more than 93 improvements over the older version and contains 60 percent locally manufactured components. However, a decision to indigenously develop a new anti-tank missile to be fitted onto the MK-II will, in all likelihood, delay the induction of the upgraded platform.

As I noted in my previous article:

Due to the repeated delays, India decided to acquire T-90s main battle tanks from Russia in the early 2000s. While the first 310 were directly imported from Russia, India is currently locally producing a customized and improved version of the T-90, the T-90 M Bhishma. A total of 500 T-90 and T-90 M tanks are currently in service in the Indian Army. India plans to field 21 tank regiments of T-90s by 2020 through license-production, with 62 tanks per unit and more than 1,300 armored fighting vehicles total, although that number could go up.

Is India’s Main Battle Tank Finally Doomed? | The Diplomat
 
. .
thediplomat_2015-06-17_20-21-25-386x173.jpg

Last week, the Indian Army released a global request for information (RFI) inviting responses by 31 July to develop a multi-purpose Future Ready Combat Vehicle (FRCV) in order to replace older license-built Soviet-era main-battle tanks (MBTs).

“The Indian Army is planning to design and develop a new generation, state-of-the-art combat vehicle platform for populating its armored fighting vehicle fleet in the coming decade. This vehicle, which will be called the future ready combat vehicle (FRCV), will form the base platform for the main battle tank which is planned to replace the existing T-72 tanks in the Armored Corps,” the RFI reads.

The Indian military envisions the FRCV system as a platform for as many as 11 different tracked vehicles, including light tracked, wheeled, bridge layer and trawl tanks, self-propelled howitzers (SPH), air defense guns, artillery observation post and engineering reconnaissance vehicles, and armored ambulances.

Additionally, the RFI notes that the FRCV “should be in the ‘Medium Tank’ category” and should “match contemporary MBTs in engagement ranges, all weather day/night fighting capability, depth of penetration and variety of ammunition.” The Indian Army wants the new FRCV ready for induction by 2025-27 – a deadline that almost certainly will have to be extended given India’s defense procurement track record.

Consequently, in the meantime, India will do well to continue upgrade its 1900 strong T-72 MBT force. As I noted in a previous article (“Breakdown: What’s Happening With India’s Tank Force?”), New Delhi has so far failed to successfully mass-produce an indigenously developed modern main battle tank.

The recent RFI could also very well ring the final death-knell for India’s indigenously developed third generation Arjun MK-I main battle tank – a poorly designed vehicle (e.g., too much heavy armor versus too little horsepower) that encountered repeated delays due to a flawed procurement and testing process. Almost eighty percent of the 124-strong Arjun MK-I tank force is currently grounded due to more than 90 technical issues.

India has been working on an improved version of the Arjun, the MK-II, which has done very well in comparative trials with license-built Russian tanks such as the T-90M. It displays more than 93 improvements over the older version and contains 60 percent locally manufactured components. However, a decision to indigenously develop a new anti-tank missile to be fitted onto the MK-II will, in all likelihood, delay the induction of the upgraded platform.

As I noted in my previous article:

Due to the repeated delays, India decided to acquire T-90s main battle tanks from Russia in the early 2000s. While the first 310 were directly imported from Russia, India is currently locally producing a customized and improved version of the T-90, the T-90 M Bhishma. A total of 500 T-90 and T-90 M tanks are currently in service in the Indian Army. India plans to field 21 tank regiments of T-90s by 2020 through license-production, with 62 tanks per unit and more than 1,300 armored fighting vehicles total, although that number could go up.

Is India’s Main Battle Tank Finally Doomed? | The Diplomat

It was always doomed. It has failed in pretty much every aspect. The delays which Arjun caused and the time wasted in looking for other Tanks has resulted in massive loss for Indian Army. But wait here come great Indian patriotic guys to defend this disaster known as Arjun Tank.
 
Last edited:
.
I think DRDO is doing great job for Pakistan if we look at her achievements and misadventures we should honor its chiefs for helping Pakistan and wasting huge some of Bharti money. Now their PAD or what also fails looking for Russian SAMs, Tejas a Failure, Arjun a Failure, Akash A failure and many more.
 
.
I think DRDO is doing great job for Pakistan if we look at her achievements and misadventures we should honor its chiefs for helping Pakistan and wasting huge some of Bharti money. Now their PAD or what also fails looking for Russian SAMs, Tejas a Failure, Arjun a Failure, Akash A failure and many more.
Modi government is doing over all great job for Pakistan as for DRDO they are turning out to be a complete disaster. Best option for India is to allow private companies to design and produce products including Tanks and Fighter Jets. They would do much better job than this DRDO.
 
. .
So does the dumb author thinks the T72s will be replaced by Arjuns?
If the author had little iota of knowledge about defence, then he would have known that the T72s which have been recently upgraded will see service at least till 2025.

And in 2025 we won't replace them with a machine made in 2015.
 
.
So does the dumb author thinks the T72s will be replaced by Arjuns?
If the author had little iota of knowledge about defence, then he would have known that the T72s which have been recently upgraded will see service at least till 2025.

And in 2025 we won't replace them with a machine made in 2015.

@Ifrit Sir please share some knowledge with him as you seem to have good knowledge on defence sector.
 
.
I think DRDO is doing great job for Pakistan if we look at her achievements and misadventures we should honor its chiefs for helping Pakistan and wasting huge some of Bharti money. Now their PAD or what also fails looking for Russian SAMs, Tejas a Failure, Arjun a Failure, Akash A failure and many more.

They all failed. But for their national pride, they call it a success even though their military won't induct them. So they end up sinking more money into them after they have been utterly rejected by their military.

Modi government is doing over all great job for Pakistan as for DRDO they are turning out to be a complete disaster. Best option for India is to allow private companies to design and produce products including Tanks and Fighter Jets. They would do much better job than this DRDO.
They will do that if the gov officials has personal stakes in the defense sector.
 
.
@Ifrit Sir please share some knowledge with him as you seem to have good knowledge on defence sector.
First of all i am not Sir a simple member like you the poster refutes his own statement when he said they upgraded T72 will serve till 2025 and how can they replace with Tank build in 2015. Arjun was a 30 year old project still not completed not a single Tank operational, during trials more then 40 time brook down. If we assume Arjun will operational with in 2015 then Author is quite right in his assumptions because during operation home grown products continuously upgraded in that sense Arjun can replaced old T-72.
 
.
@Ifrit Sir please share some knowledge with him as you seem to have good knowledge on defence sector.

Comprehension problems? Well I cannot help you with that.Only can i say that go read again what I said and come back with what you didn't understood.
 
. .
I think DRDO is doing great job for Pakistan if we look at her achievements and misadventures we should honor its chiefs for helping Pakistan and wasting huge some of Bharti money. Now their PAD or what also fails looking for Russian SAMs, Tejas a Failure, Arjun a Failure, Akash A failure and many more.


Yes, look at her achievement that's helping Pakistan. Like having an SSBN and it's SLBMs trialing right now.
 
. . .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom