Gandhi G in da house
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 9,475
- Reaction score
- -24
- Country
- Location
From Bhutan to Queen to North-East Indians in 4 pages . Sounds typically like a defence.pk discussion
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he looks like Chinese?if so I must look like a foreigner.
I looked for a picture of this guy on the internet, and he doesn't look Chinese at all.
Having slight East Asian features, does NOT make you an East Asian.
If anything, that guy "Purna Aitok Sangma" looks like an Indonesian.
What about this guy!!?He was the chief election commissioner of India,its a seat of high power he too is from the NE state of Meghalaya!!His name is JM Lyngdoh. . . .
he looks like Chinese?if so I must look like a foreigner.
he looks like Chinese?if so I must look like a foreigner.
What about this guy!!?He was the chief election commissioner of India,its a seat of high power he too is from the NE state of Meghalaya!!His name is JM Lyngdoh. . . . BTW just out of curiosity . . . .neither do Tibetans look like the Han Chinese if I go by ur logic:
She doesn't look Indian one bit. She looks Mongoloid to me.
Parts of my face (e.g. lips, cheeks, and ears) are pink like hers. I've never seen a pink ethnic Indian.
That's exactly the point I am trying to make as well!Just because some countries have a population which are essentially Mongoloid in nature it does not imply that the country belongs to China!!Like they said during the invasion of Tibet and then moving on to Arunachal Pradesh!!If anyone goes by the Chinese logic then a war is about to break out in EU!I usually see Chinese members on this forum justifying Chinese claims on parts of NE India just because the people there are of Mongoloid stock. . .Hence the effort to make a point!He doesn't look Chinese either. I don't know why I AM the one arguing that Northeast Indians have nothing to do with Chinese, while Indians seem content to call them Chinkis so much that they had to ban the word.
Does that make sense to you? It is not only a racial attack, it is aligning them with your Chinese enemies, same as how many Indians call the Indian Muslims like "ajtr" as "Pakis".
P.S. As for your other point, Tibetans are not Han Chinese. There are 56 distinct ethnicities that make up the Chinese nationality. Han Chinese like us make up the vast majority of the population.
That's exactly the point I am trying to make as well!Just because some countries have a population which are essentially Mongoloid in nature it does not imply that the country belongs to China!!Like they said during the invasion of Tibet and then moving on to Arunachal Pradesh!!If anyone goes by the Chinese logic then a war is about to break out in EU!I usually see Chinese members on this forum justifying Chinese claims on parts of NE India just because the people there are of Mongoloid stock. . .Hence the effort to make a point!
What on Earth are you talking about? For the last time, NE Indians are NOT related to Chinese. They are related to Burmese and others from South East Asia.
I do not know why on EARTH the Indians are so intent on connecting NE Indians to Chinese and calling them Chinki all day, do you really hate them that much to refer to them as an ethnicity from an enemy country?
That's exactly the point I am trying to make as well!Just because some countries have a population which are essentially Mongoloid in nature it does not imply that the country belongs to China!!Like they said during the invasion of Tibet and then moving on to Arunachal Pradesh!!If anyone goes by the Chinese logic then a war is about to break out in EU!I usually see Chinese members on this forum justifying Chinese claims on parts of NE India just because the people there are of Mongoloid stock. . .Hence the effort to make a point!
What about this guy!!?He was the chief election commissioner of India,its a seat of high power he too is from the NE state of Meghalaya!!His name is JM Lyngdoh. . . .