Is ancient India overrated? A mind blowing analysis by Chinese professor

[Peshwa]

Where was it before? Lost perhaps? In West Indian islands? In Indonesia? MMmmmmmmm where?

Definitely NOT in any country named Pakistan! At least not in 4930 years of its 5000 year old history!

 

[salarsikander]

What about the other 95%?

As time goes on, that connection with india will greatly diminish especially as Pakistan's future is now intertwinned with that of Turkey & China and as Pakistan becomes more connected to those nations to the West of us of whom we share the most in common with.

Bullshit. I have nothing in common with swamp people and their backward culture

 

[Indus Pakistan]

What about the other 95%?

This is Ganga logic. Ganga inferiority. They keep bringing up the 10% link. USA has 12% African Americans. Thus Ganga logic declares Americans to be full blown African Niggas.

Ps. My understanding is significant portion of the Mohajir population had roots in Afghanistan etc who settled in India during the Muslim rule.

 

[salarsikander]

What about the 10% Muhajirs, who have connection with 50% of Indians? Don't they count as Pakistanis?

Nothing in common with those who shake their head. Like one would could remain stuck forever trying to figure that if its yes or no. I have nothing in common with the ganga swamp culture

 

[Peshwa]

This is Ganga logic. Ganga inferiority. They keep bringing up the 10% link. USA has 12% African Americans. Thus Ganga logic declares Americans to be full blown African Niggas.

Ps. My understanding is significant portion of the Mohajir population had roots in Afghanistan etc who settled in India during the Muslim rule.

How is finding commonality with someone "inferiority"? Maybe start by explaining that logic.

 

[El Sidd]

I am apt to agree with our Singaporan friend. He who speaks as it is - that Indus > Pakistan should get our support.

My friend it's not that easy. You see the problem is the history is too vague.
I know where exactly he is coming from. I have first hand account.

Why don't you try looking at this from a Chinese POV. Indus civilisation is the first they would encounter apart from their own. They identify us as the people of the Indus. The peaceful understanding assimilating pragmatic people.

If you need help. You can study the Chinese language. You will get a general idea.

u said:



my post was in response to this.

Confusing sometimes this forum

 

[salarsikander]

One more thing Today's pakistanis share nothing with their great ancestors except land

Glad that they don't share anything with swamp culture of ganga. The ones who migrated rejected the culture that was built around so called 5000 years without any record whatsoever.

 

[Pakistani E]

You see you call us Bharati as we are from the country called Bharat Varsh.
You Know the name Bharat comes from actual/mythical King Bharat who was the ruler of Bharat Varsh some 5000 years ago as said in the great Hindu epic of Mahabharat .

India was created in 1947, before that, there was no such state as India. I suggest you re-read the history of the British Raj, since that is the starting point of the modern day state of India.

However, if you want to state that your people have been here before the state of India was founded, then go ahead. There is no difference of opinion there.

 

[KN-1]

That is why I said 50% of the Indians.

again desperate attempt, none of them (bihari, bengali, up, dehli, bombay, rajhasthan, hyderabadi, kutchi etc) are in considerable number to be recognize as shared race.. Instead they are all mixing with people of indus hence heavily indusianized, nothing left of ganga, no choori dar pajama, no sari, no kola puri chappal and lungi anymore..

i am eager to know how low these gangoos can go to claim similiarity with evil Pakistan they are exposing their inferiority complex and i am enjoying it..

 

[El Sidd]

The established years are supported by archaeology and various other means to determine the dates. Recorded history is only 1 of them. China has a lackluster oral tradition whereby history is passed down from mouth to mouth(like Indian civillization).

There is nothing debatable, which is why i've stated the differences between the Chinese and Western perspective, which is either 4087 years old(Chinese) or 3617 years old(Western)

and BTW, Babylonian civ. is the world's Oldest civ.- not Indus. The Fertile Cresent is where humans started living in fixed structures. google this yourself.

You see my Kurdish friends who claim Mosul to be the oldest city in the world would agree to that.

But again a oral culture.

I have to admit i have not yet mastered this. I have certain ideas but they are very crude.


But i guess the new DNA journey project may very well answer these theories.

The first out of Africa is still alive.

This is just too deep a pool.

 

[Peshwa]

This is Ganga logic. Ganga inferiority. They keep bringing up the 10% link. USA has 12% African Americans. Thus Ganga logic declares Americans to be full blown African Niggas.

Ps. My understanding is significant portion of the Mohajir population had roots in Afghanistan etc who settled in India during the Muslim rule.

The folly of your example is that African Americans path to the Americas can be traced...they, nor the whites belonged to the Americas. They migrated or were brought as slaves.
Indians and Pakistanis have shared the same piece of land for millennia....Those 10% migrated from a new political entity of the same piece of land called India in history...NOT some distant land. so that's a fail!

 

[salarsikander]

exposing their inferiority complex and i am enjoying it..

Pakistan is land of gods. Its about time gangos start worshipping its inhabitants too.

I believe this is a deliberate attempt by gangoos to get into our good books before they openly worship us

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

This is Ganga logic. Ganga inferiority. They keep bringing up the 10% link. USA has 12% African Americans. Thus Ganga logic declares Americans to be full blown African Niggas.

Ps. My understanding is significant portion of the Mohajir population had roots in Afghanistan etc who settled in India during the Muslim rule.

Lol......lol......so now ALL americans are connected to and have a genetic link to Sub-Saharan black africans as per gangalander logic.........nice one bro.......

I don't think Jared Taylor, Richard Spencer snd Millenial Woes will agree with you......

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Indians and Pakistanis have shared the same piece of land for millennia.

No they have NOT. I am certain non of my people lived anywhere you live. And vice versa to you. Stop conflating a huge sub-continent into one entity. That way at one point my ancestors shared the same piece of land with Greece but that does not make me Greek.

And in UK there are at least 5% proper Indians from the Ganga. does it mean anything? no.

And where do the Dravid Indian's stand in this equation? Or where do the Tibeto-Burmans of Ladakh, Arunchal Pradesh stand? Are they not Indian or are they Chinese? Or do the Dravid Indians belong in the same sphere as Sri Lanka and Tibeto-Burmans belong to the Sino sphere?

 

[Peshwa]

No they have NOT. I am certain non of my people lived anywhere you live. And vice versa to you. Stop conflating a huge sub-continent into one entity. That way at one point my ancestors shared the same piece of land with Greece but that does not make me Greek.

And in UK there are at least 5% proper Indians from the Ganga. does it mean anything? no.

And where do the Dravid Indian's stand in this equation? Or where do the Tibeto-Burmans of Ladakh, Arunchal Pradesh stand? Are they not Indian or are they Chinese? Or do the Dravid Indians belong in the same sphere as Sri Lanka and Tibeto-Burmans belong to the Sino sphere?

The stupidity of this line of argument is that the same boundaries existed for the 5000 year old history of the subcontinent.
And as far as my people are concerned, the Marathas ruled large swathes of present day Pakistan. So YES! They absolutely shared land at different points in time with your ancestors. That is if you're even from Pakistan.
And FYI, I consider Marathas as Dravidians.

And please for god's sake, stop making asinine comparisons with Indians in the UK. You're just embarrassing yourself at this point.