Waiting give us another Bubble hope, let's to start.I guess we have to wait and see what happens post arms embargo.
TOT of aircraft technology is tough for any country to give up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Waiting give us another Bubble hope, let's to start.I guess we have to wait and see what happens post arms embargo.
TOT of aircraft technology is tough for any country to give up.
unlike what every one think, russia is more reliable supplier than china, china didn't provide any support to our f-7 fleet. our f-7s were just capable of firing rockets until air force self sufficiency organization made some weapons for them.Chinese Aircrafts especially J-10 not an option for Iran?
JF-17 was really a success for PAK, Iran also could benefit from such a joint project with China.
the best thing we can do is making turbofan version of j-85 with 19-30 kn output thrust. we should cooperate with russians to gain new techs and build our infrastructure.Waiting give us another Bubble hope, let's to start.
The most important factor to start a turbofan project at now is good funding and managing.the best thing we can do is making turbofan version of j-85 with 19-30 kn output thrust. we should cooperate with russians to gain new techs and build our infrastructure.
Research and Development ALWAYS = Progress.There is major problem in your assumption. That is that RD = progress. That couldn’t be farther form the truth. Assuming funding RD will lead to timely progress is flawed thinking.
Research and Development ALWAYS = Progress.
DARPA have a %90+ failure rate of its funded projects. We consider that progress. Iran and everyone else are free to adopt your attitude.
Good point. I wished they would at least use a different paint scheme just to make it to stand out as different....some American baboons (in other forums)who know nothing about what is going on with aviation industry in iran are saying that Iranians have managed to build a state of art fighter which is 50 years old...I wonder why people in this forum consider Kowsar to be F-5? Because of how the airframe? Everything else seems to be different, at least how I understood. If the internal components are much different, especially radar, avionics, and the missiles that it can be equipped with, why would people consider it to be F-5?
Research and Development ALWAYS = Progress.
DARPA have a %90+ failure rate of its funded projects. We consider that progress. Iran and everyone else are free to adopt your attitude.
View attachment 554596
your good at this. BTW that edges i marked at image should be parallel to improve stealth characteristics.
View attachment 554597
guys any idea which missle is this??
I wonder why people in this forum consider Kowsar to be F-5? Because of how the airframe looks like? Everything else seems to be different, at least how I understood. If the internal components are much different, especially radar, avionics, and the missiles that it can be equipped with, why would people consider it to be F-5?
That is actually sad. Am not being mean or condescending. Just factual.When RQ-170 capture in iran, a military official claimed the engine advanced Iran’s knowledge by 20 years! They said such a thing wouldn’t be possible without this event.
That is actually sad. Am not being mean or condescending. Just factual.
There is nothing technologically spectacular about the RQ-170. It is not 'stealth' in the sense that the program had low radar observability as primary consideration. The flying wing design was used because of its long duration and fuel economy advantages. All the electronics were typical commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS).
As far as the engine go...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_TF34
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_CF34
The GE F34 engine is over 20 yrs old by the time we lost that RQ-170. So either that 'military official' exaggerated the technological significance of the aircraft in order to equally exaggerate Iranian's capabilities of 'hacking' or whatever else, or truly Iran's jet engine technology is really behind.
so why your authorities said iranians can't encrypt the data stored in it or something like: iranians can't build something like it, it's too advanced. according to some people in our military we expected US air force or special forces come to destroy the wreckage but they didn't because obama was afraid. youre politicians fucked up and they are trying to save face.That is actually sad. Am not being mean or condescending. Just factual.
There is nothing technologically spectacular about the RQ-170. It is not 'stealth' in the sense that the program had low radar observability as primary consideration. The flying wing design was used because of its long duration and fuel economy advantages. All the electronics were typical commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS).
As far as the engine go...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_TF34
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_CF34
The GE F34 engine is over 20 yrs old by the time we lost that RQ-170. So either that 'military official' exaggerated the technological significance of the aircraft in order to equally exaggerate Iranian's capabilities of 'hacking' or whatever else, or truly Iran's jet engine technology is really behind.
Realistically, if IRIAF were to mass produce these beefed-up F5 indigenous made fighters, then how much of a threat could a few squadrons pose to newer generation fighters like the F-16 or F-35?