What's new

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visits Vietnam

.
You idiot!

Who says Iran should give up nuclear energy? They should give up the idea of possessing of nuclear weapons!

he is not an idiot but you are agent infected retard viet by saying vietcong can convince iran to give up their nuclear program
 
.
he is not an idiot but you are agent infected retard viet by saying vietcong can convince iran to give up their nuclear program

Thanks bro, everybody laughs at his megalomania. Even though his Indian brothers don't make any comment about it i'm sure they think the same like the rest of us which is the mighty Vietnam can do the impossible.
 
. . . .
Got nothing to say anymore huh regarding the Cuban missile crisis. I know you lost face as you just can't find anything to proof me wrong about what you call CCP version. PGM-19 Jupiter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lol i said you are right but we did not use the jupiter to deterrent the soviet :) I have already said you can blame all the Nuclear weapon program in the world to the US, (Did you even read my post?? I believe this is what i said
probably can blame every nuclear stand off to United States (They do was the first country that have and USED nuclear weapon).
) but it's not started in the 1960, it started in 1945.

We use this

Fat Man - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

and this

Little Boy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This two bomb has been and still is the only 2 used in actual war, you can say whatever you want but whatever bombs, missile and whatever nuclear start from these 2, and these 2 is what bring the Soviet Russia Nuclear into gear... LOL

If you have to say it, the punchline is, we don't deter, we do. Unless you have proof this 2 bomb is not the direct clause of Soviet having to fear the use of them on them and decided to develope their own nuclear weapon, i am all ears. If not, please shut up.
 
.
You are the one to shut up after all the bullsh!t story you were trying to make. Since you fell flat on your face you are trying to go back to 1945 talking bout the first 2 atom bombs. You know how to derail something don't ya!!! So i suggest you to stay on topic if you have anything to say about this thread.
 
.
You are the one to shut up after all the bullsh!t story you were trying to make. Since you fell flat on your face you are trying to go back to 1945 talking bout the first 2 atom bombs. You know how to derail something don't ya!!! So i suggest you to stay on topic if you have anything to say about this thread.

You are saying i am wrong?? LOL

Well, i can agrue with you, all day regarding how it started the Cuban Missile Crisis, you are gonna say US deploy missile in Turkey and Italy and England and blah blah blah, then i am gonna say well, if Not the Russian deployed 2000 tanks in East Germany border and blah blah blah, we can go on all day, why can't you agree the whole thing is started by the cold war, and the cold war is started by the 2 bomb we drop in Japan

Russian see that is too powerful and a game changer and they make their own, then After they do, they build the airfield and massive tank corp to protect the launch site (US can start a ground war and overrun a launch site where Russia cannot as itit's over an ocean. Then they have all the tanks, we need all the missile, then they have their missile too, then we need more missile. Why can't we just skip all that and blame the 2 bombs and the manhattan project?

I have already conceived that this is the American who started the Nuclear race (They were the firs tto develope the bomb) i don't like any country having nuclear weapon, if you cannot accept the fact it's these 2 bomb that start all this, that's your problem, you can go on in detail and tell me how the russian deployt and what did the American do, it mean nothing each step either side made is to counter the move made by another side, and in the end, you will definitely trace back to the 2 bomb we drop in WW2. UNless you have another idea (Maybe CCP teach youguys Martian started the cold war, i dunno)

I enjoy laugh at your pointless agruement but please do not hijack the thread. We are not even talking about cold war in this thread, if you want to talk about the cold war, open a new thread. Thank you

Seems to me, you are the one who off topic, topic of this thread is

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visits Vietnam

Not why Iranian or how Iranian have nuclear power or whatever weapon they hav eor whatever weapon they don't have
 
.
You need to go check who started the comparison of the Cuban missile first which the dumb Viet was trying to portray Iran as the evil USSR threatening the US first. But you were the one who started to troll and hijack the thread not me. Lousy accusation coming from you again.

And if you like to go back in time dating back to the 2 bombs dropped in Japan. You might as well go blame China for inventing gunpowder. Now stop hijacking the thread.
 
. .
You need to go check who started the comparison of the Cuban missile first which the dumb Viet was trying to portray Iran as the evil USSR threatening the US first. But you were the one who started to troll and hijack the thread not me. Lousy accusation coming from you again.

And if you like to go back in time dating back to the 2 bombs dropped in Japan. You might as well go blame China for inventing gunpowder. Now stop hijacking the thread.

Well, i don't know why you are still trolling about this topic with a different title.

The nuclear war does not start with guns. If you talk about WW2, yeah, maybe you can trace back to the invention of gun powder, but the fact remain, cold war is started by the way how WW2 ends, and Irani Nuclear scares is undoubtedly started by whoever invent the nuclear bomb.

Seriously i am over it, you can reply or whatever i don't really care, you accuse me of hijacking this thread while you intimate me into posting the last post. I already want nothing with you 3 post ago, so i am gonna do it now, bye :)
 
. .
Thanks bro, everybody laughs at his megalomania. Even though his Indian brothers don't make any comment about it i'm sure they think the same like the rest of us which is the mighty Vietnam can do the impossible.

Sorry to correct you again.

I said maybe we can convince them. If not, we can still say the world we have tried. Nobody can blame us that we missed the chance. Even China does not trust Iran words and backs santions.

.aljazeera.com

Russia and China to back Iran resolution

Last Modified: 12 Sep 2012 14:40

With Israel threatening to use military force, agreement is seen as progress after months of diplomatic deadlock.


20129118136499734_20.jpg

Iran has refused foreign offers to supply reactor fuel so that it would stop making its own through enrichment [AFP]


After days of diplomacy, Russia and China have agreed to support a US-backed resolution demanding that Iran stop activities that could be used to make nuclear arms.

Diplomats said on Wednesday the agreement sent a unified message to Iran, but also convinced Israel that diplomacy was a real alternative to military force in preventing a nuclear confrontation.

The resolution cannot be enforced by the 35-nation board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), even if approved by vote or consensus as expected on Thursday. But with Israel threatening war against Iran, the agreement is a significant progress after months of diplomatic deadlock.

Israel views a nuclear-armed Iran as a strategic threat, citing Iran's persistent calls for the destruction of the Jewish state, its development of missiles capable of striking Israel, and Iranian support for Arab armed groups.

Iran's stand

Iran insists its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only.

But it refuses foreign offers of reactor fuel if it stops making its own through uranium enrichment - a process that worries the international community because it could also be used to arm nuclear warheads.

Russia and China to back Iran resolution - Middle East - Al Jazeera English
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom