CAN_TR
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2018
- Messages
- 3,417
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Dezful missiles.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Iraq said the same thing when fighting rice farmers in Vietnam prior to Gulf War 1 conflict. Mother of all battles. The U.S. is capable of dealing with such defenses. Its no different when you see them testing missiles and bombs against hardened bunkers and caves. You saw similar tests when Syria's airbases were bombed with hardened bunkers that look similar. Why not in the mountains?
Assuming all the missiles were able to accurately hit and avoid defenses.
Runways can be repaired not to mention you have highways that can be used as runways. So in other words you have to bomb more.
Find it funny how Ameritards talk about how they kicked Iraq´s *** in 1991 Gulf war.... yet are cluless that Iraq had just come out of an 8 year devestating war, and also sent all of their Air force to Iran for "safe keeping". America basically beat a dead country and still brags about it..... and the Ameritards some how thing a war with Iran will basically end the same way.
ALso, the presence of SERIOUS mountains in any country automatically commits the aggressor to send in ground forces because air attacks are already assumed to be less effective in hilly countries. Good example is Afghanistan. So already, US WILL need ground troops for any military action more escalated than "strong warning" level IMO.If you notice in the U.S. Tomahawk strikes in Syria the missiles didn't collapse the bunkers, rather used a penetrating warhead to penetrate and then damage & or destroy whatever that was inside. And even 1100lb warhead like what the AMG-158 wouldn't be enough to collapse the entrances in any meaningful way
And in Iranian underground missile base the missiles aren't stored in and around the entrance but rather stored deep inside the maintains in areas that are +200 feet underground and they are stored that way because Iran is aware of American capabilities and weapons like the GBU-28 and others and since in Iran Mountains make up most of our terrain they become a natural cover and in the past 2 decades Iran's become quite officiant at building underground tunnels and bases and anyone that's ever rode on Tehran's Metro station knows that this is not some kind of a bluff because in some areas of Tehran the metro stations are located as deep as 164ft under ground so just imagine how deep Iranian missiles bases go.
If you notice in the U.S. Tomahawk strikes in Syria the missiles didn't collapse the bunkers, rather used a penetrating warhead to penetrate and then damage & or destroy whatever that was inside. And even 1100lb warhead like what the AMG-158 wouldn't be enough to collapse the entrances in any meaningful way
And in Iranian underground missile base the missiles aren't stored in and around the entrance but rather stored deep inside the maintains in areas that are +200 feet underground and they are stored that way because Iran is aware of American capabilities and weapons like the GBU-28 and others and since in Iran Mountains make up most of our terrain they become a natural cover and in the past 2 decades Iran's become quite officiant at building underground tunnels and bases and anyone that's ever rode on Tehran's Metro station knows that this is not some kind of a bluff because in some areas of Tehran the metro stations are located as deep as 164ft under ground so just imagine how deep Iranian missiles bases go.
Yeah and if you notice the missiles and bombs have the capability to punch through very deep in the mountains. You are still not aware of U.S. capabilities. Even now. I mean even now you didn't mention the newer bombs because you yourself are not aware of it. All you mentioned was the GBU-28 from the Gulf War.
The USA has a bomb that holds in the hands and able to destroy the planet Jupiter. They are strong these Americans and especially they are not idiots
New Recruit
Its actuality a chemical weapon , its called Ayatollah Turd and its deadly ..Iran has a bomb that could wipe out the oceans as they claimed.
To destroy a base such as al-Sufran or Livu in the UAE, we need something about 20-30 Qiam missiles and 30-40 Fateh missiles.
Red Circle Radius Destruction power of Qiam missile.
Blue Circle Radius Destruction power of Fateh missile.
Zolfaghar missiles at there finest
one of the Qiam missile storage facilities
To fully and completely destroy a military base as large as the Bagram base in Afghanistan, assuming that the missiles have the pin point accuracy and the 100-meter destruction radius, we need about 100-150 short-range ballistic missiles such as the Qiam.
Iraq said the same thing when fighting rice farmers in Vietnam prior to Gulf War 1 conflict. Mother of all battles. The U.S. is capable of dealing with such defenses. Its no different when you see them testing missiles and bombs against hardened bunkers and caves. You saw similar tests when Syria's airbases were bombed with hardened bunkers that look similar. Why not in the mountains?
Assuming all the missiles were able to accurately hit and avoid defenses.
Runways can be repaired not to mention you have highways that can be used as runways. So in other words you have to bomb more.
Yeah and if you notice the missiles and bombs have the capability to punch through very deep in the mountains. You are still not aware of U.S. capabilities. Even now. I mean even now you didn't mention the newer bombs because you yourself are not aware of it. All you mentioned was the GBU-28 from the Gulf War.
Yeah and if you notice the missiles and bombs have the capability to punch through very deep in the mountains. You are still not aware of U.S. capabilities. Even now. I mean even now you didn't mention the newer bombs because you yourself are not aware of it. All you mentioned was the GBU-28 from the Gulf War.