What's new

Iranian economy on the verge of collapse

You're the clueless fool with the low i.q here indian. I'm a fan of National Socialism and i'm proud, i don't think i need to tattoo it on my forehead like some Zionist owned hollywood pop-culture influenced skinheads do.

This clueless fool, will be one of those people gassed like an animal and thrown in the pits just cuz he is a Pakistani. Thats what he doesnt understand. National socialism my ***. Hitler was a fuckin moron. There was a psycho analytic report put out back in the 1940s about Hitler, by some American psychologists in a bid to understand why Hitler did whatever he did. They concluded that he was a faggot, and he suffered from obsessive compulsion to a very unreasonable degree.

Plus, he was a very bad military tactician too, I mean only a moron would start war on two fronts with the whole world.

So in short, Hitler was an idiot with very low IQ, and if someone is following him, we dont need to say much more than that.

Now am not talking about the Jews here AT ALL. I am not talking about Muslims nor am I talking about the US or what it did in the last 6 decades. I am solely talking about National Socialism and Hitler. Its shitty politics, a shitty way to govern a society. And its ultra conservative which makes it even worse. Only a inbred moron would buy into such ideologies.
 
.
As Iran’s Currency Keeps Tumbling, Anxiety Is Rising http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/05/w...umbling-anxiety-is-rising.html?_r=1&ref=world


jp-iran-articleLarge.jpg

TEHRAN — For months, since the imposition of harsh, American-led sanctions over Iran’s nuclear program, the country’s leaders have sworn they would never succumb to Western pressures, and they scoffed at the idea that the measures were having any serious impact. But after a week in which the Iranian currency, the rial, fell by a shocking 40 percent and protests began to rumble through the capital, no one is making light of the mounting costs of confrontation.


In the Iranian capital, all anyone can talk about is the rial, and how lives have been turned upside down in one terrible week. Every elevator ride, office visit or quick run to the supermarket brings new gossip about the currency’s drop and a swirl of speculation about who is to blame.

“Better buy now,” one rice seller advised Abbas Sharabi, a retired factory guard, who had decided to buy 900 pounds of Iran’s most basic staple in order to feed his extended family for a year.

“As I was gathering my money, the man received a phone call,” said Mr. Sharabi, smoking cigarette after cigarette on Thursday while waiting for a bus. “When he hung up he told me prices had just gone up by 10 percent. Of course I paid. God knows how much it will cost tomorrow.”

While only a few people actually need to exchange the rial for foreign currency, its value is one of the few clear indicators of the state of the economy, and its fall has sharply raised the prices of most staples.

In Tehran, many residents spend their days calling on money changers and visiting banks, deliberating whether to sell their rials now or wait for a miracle that would restore the rates to old levels, or for even a modest rally from the panic-driven lows of the last week.

“The fluctuations are so large that nobody knows whether it is better to wait or to change now,” said Ahmad, 65, as he shared a taxi to the west Tehran neighborhood of Sadeghiyeh. “I am so fed up,” said Ahmad, a garment seller, who like others here did not want to be identified by his full name for fear of retribution from the authorities. “I want to have a normal life, but from breakfast, to lunch to dinner, everybody only nervously talks of hard currency.”

Like many residents of the capital, Ahmad had tuned in to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s news conference on Tuesday, hoping that he would offer some sort of solution.

Instead, Mr. Ahmadinejad attributed most of the rial’s weakness to currency speculators and the sanctions, saying that it is only natural that the currency should suffer when it is possible to sell oil only in small quantities and when it is hard to make international bank transfers. His opponents say he is trying to avoid blame for his own mismanagement of the economy. He even went so far as to threaten to quit.

“He has made a mess, and now he wants to leave us,” Ahmad said of the president. But a passenger in the taxi named Mostafa interrupted. “No,” he said, “most of our leaders are at fault, but they are trying to blame everything on Ahmadinejad.”

Just a day later, on Wednesday, clashes erupted when riot police officers on motorcycles dispersed sidewalk money changers near Tehran’s main bazaar. The government has accused them of deliberately manufacturing the currency crisis. At the bazaar, an important trade hub, shopkeepers closed their shutters, and hundreds of citizens joined them in a protest against the bad economy.

While life seemingly returned to normal on Thursday, the outburst of public anger exposed the deep feeling of hopelessness that has taken hold among many Iranians.

Experts are divided about whether the crisis has been caused more by Tehran’s longtime mismanagement of the country’s economy or by the American-led sanctions, which have been imposed over Iran’s refusal to halt a nuclear program that the West suspects is a cover for developing weapons. Whatever the cause, members of the once-vibrant middle class have turned into cynics, many of whom say they might be alive, but are not living.

For Maysam, the son of a man who was killed in the Iran-Iraq war, a decade of relative prosperity and technological innovations had enabled him to travel widely and had turned him into a prominent blogger and critic of the system that his father had died defending. Instead of hoping to die on a battlefield, he had planned to run his own Internet start-up company.

But those dreams have been shattered. “We can’t even think of the future, of tomorrow, the day after, or the next week,” Maysam said. Foreign trips are out of the question, as even the price of a cup of coffee in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, or Istanbul — favorite destinations for Iranians — has tripled when calculated in rials. Parents of the legions of Iranians studying abroad are calling their children back to Iran, as rents and college fees in countries like the Philippines and Malaysia have become unaffordable
 
.
The problem lies in the fact that with all their tough talk and bluster , the govt of Iran could not sustain its self against sanctions.
its not like the govt did not know this . they must have had an inkling . its ok to stand up and tell others to get lost but one should have the ability to sustain one self if needed.
IMHO the govt of Iran should have worked out things with the west and sat and had dialogues instead of thumbing their nose at the west . it would have been far more productive and the people of Iran would not have suffered.
 
.
Any further attempt by this desperate flaming homosexual indian troll jayatl and his troll account will be ignored and their low iq rants will be reported.



Iran's economy is hurting – yet sanctions are not a nuclear deterrent



Despite growing economic pain, there seems no overriding reason why Iran's leadership would change its nuclear stance



Hassan Hakimian
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 3 October 2012 07.18 EDT
Jump to comments (165)

Iran-curency-fell-to-a-ne-008.jpg

An Iranian man counts his banknotes after Iran's currency, the rial, crashed to a record low. Photograph: Abedin Taherkenareh/EPA



The recent mayhem in Iran's currency markets that has seen a staggering 17% depreciation of the rial in one day is likely to go down as Iran's version of the UK's Black Wednesday.

But as central bank authorities around the world operating under fixed exchange rates know, it is futile to try to intervene in the markets to prop up a beleaguered currency. That was the lesson Norman Lamont, the former British chancellor of the exchequer, learned in 1992.

This also seems to be the lesson Iran's central bank discovered only a week after setting up a "special exchange" to calm the currency nerves: markets responded by taking those measures as sure signs of abnormality.

The precipitous decline in the value of the national currency in recent days represents in essence a dash by Iranians from all walks of life to take shelter in the safety offered by hard currencies.

This has in turn set in motion a vicious spiral from which there may be no easy escape in the short term other than measures such as restricting imports, rationing basic commodities and reintroducing the multiple exchange rate system that Iranians came to know in the harsh decade of the 1980s during the war with Iraq.

Market sentiments and psychological factors no doubt play a big part in situations like this. The main drivers, however, have deeper roots and are compounded by both domestic and external factors.

Iran's economy is vulnerable on two fronts. Over-reliance on oil exports, which account for 80% of her foreign currency revenues, is compounded by a high degree of import dependence for major items, both for feeding the population and for keeping industrial units afloat. The rial's recent freefall reflects mainly negative market sentiments and an expectation that the Iranian government will continue to experience severe difficulties in selling oil in international markets as the sanctions' noose tightens.

The level of Iran's foreign currency reserves, though not known exactly, is respectable, at least on paper, by regional standards. According to Opec, the value of Iran's petroleum exports in 2011 exceeded $114bn, which indicates a comfortable imports cover of over a year. This is much better than for "Arab spring" countries such as Egypt and Tunisia. The problem, however, is the markets' glum prognosis of where sanctions are taking Iran's economy in the medium term.

Such structural factors are compounded by poor policies and mismanagement at home. With an administration criticised by friends and foes alike for lack of transparency, official Iranian data are often received with derision both inside and outside Iran.

Analysis of Iran's economic policy is also complicated by intense factional politics and an intricate labyrinth of decision-making, ratification and oversight. Moreover, a veneer of official probity and populist jargon sits oddly with widespread patronage, a spate of banking scandals, record non-performing loans and a highly skewed concentration of wealth. It is no wonder that both rival factions and the public at large blame the economic plight of the country squarely on president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's administration.

Structural weaknesses and poor domestic management give great comfort to proponents of unilateral economic sanctions who have been too willing to predict the Iranian economy's downfall.

Victoria Nuland, the US state department's spokeswoman, was quick to attribute the rial's recent ill fate to "the unrelenting and increasingly successful international pressure" on Iran's economy.

Earlier in the week, Israel's finance minister, Yuval Steinitz, alleged that the sanctions were pushing the Iranian economy towards collapse.

As early as in January 2011, Hillary Clinton was claiming to a student audience in the UAE that "the sanctions are working", judging by "a slowdown in Iran's nuclear progress".

The underlying logic of these extrapolations is that "if sanctions are hurting, they must be working". But this overlooks a number of important issues.

First, although Iranian sanctions are harsh, other economies have withstood harsher economic pressures in the past and there is no shortage of regimes under sanctions which have survived without changing their course – North Korea, Zimbabwe and Cuba, to name but a few.

Second, if sanctions were to be judged by their adverse impact on the population at large their "success" would be a foregone conclusion. The tightening noose has already led to shortages in essentials such as some food items and medicine precipitating panic buying. Similar sanctions against Iraq under Saddam Hussein pushed millions below the poverty line, increased infant mortality and stepped up the brain drain without altering the government's foreign policy.

Third, precisely how economic sanctions are expected to "work" is not always clear. Two main explanations seem to be on offer. First, an implicit assumption that sanctions help the economic and political cycles to converge (ie, economic hardship will bring about internal implosion); and second, that they help alter the balance of the costs and benefits associated with undesirable policies (in this case Iran's "'nuclear ambitions") by raising the former and diminishing the latter.

The problem is that the first of these "mechanisms" flies in the face of evidence: both the "Arab spring" and Iran's 1979 revolution followed periods of relative prosperity, not deprivation and hardship.

Similarly, the cost-benefit rationale overlooks the fact that ideologue regimes like Iran tend to have a high pain threshold and may be willing to take a big hit against their population without yielding in their international stance. Despite growing economic pain, there seems as yet no overriding reason why the Iranian regime might back down on its nuclear stance.

Economic sanctions – whether in Iran or elsewhere – are ultimately flawed because of the way they operate: as collective punishment they penalise the very victims of the target regimes who might use the spectre of external threat to quash internal dissent.

As with so many sanctions in recent history, the sanctions against Iran are clearly proving capable of destabilising the economy and inflicting pain on ordinary people, while the prospect of achieving their stated objective of nuclear non-proliferation in the region remains elusive.
 
.
Israel finance minister says Iran economy "on verge of collapse"



JERUSALEM | Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:05am EDT

(Reuters) - Iran's economy is edging towards collapse due to international sanctions over its controversial nuclear program, Israeli Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz said on Sunday.

Israel regards the prospect of its arch enemy developing nuclear weapons as a threat to its existence, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that, although sanctions are taking their toll, they are not yet forcing Iran to abandon work that could soon lead to a nuclear warhead.

However, Israeli officials appear increasingly ready to acknowledge the effect of recent American and European sanctions designed to restrict Iran's lifeline oil exports.

"The sanctions on Iran in the past year jumped a level," Steinitz told Israel Radio, noting that as finance minister, he follows Iran's economy.

"It is not collapsing, but it is on the verge of collapse. The loss of income from oil there is approaching $45-50 billion by the year's end," Steinitz said.

The United States, Israel's main ally, says it will not allow Tehran to produce the bomb, but sanctions should be given more time to work before force is considered.

American and Israeli commentators say a military strike to destroy Iran's nuclear plants, which Iran says are designed only to develop a nuclear generating capacity, could trigger a regional war with unforeseeable consequences.

In Israel too, some prominent political and military figures question Netanyahu's warning that Iran is so close to the threshold of nuclear capability that military action will soon be the only way to stop it.

But there has been no open split in his coalition over the issue. Steinitz praised the prime minister's speech to the U.N. General Assembly last week in which he used graphics to underscore the perceived Iranian threat.

SOARING INFLATION

An Israeli Foreign Ministry document leaked last week said sanctions had caused more damage to Iran's economy than at first thought and ordinary Iranians were suffering under soaring inflation, although this did not appear to be changing policy.

On Saturday, the Iranian currency slumped to an historic low of about 28,400 rials to the dollar, a fall of about 57 percent since June 2011, meaning a sharp rise in the price of imports.

"The Iranians are in great economic difficulties as a result of the sanctions," Steinitz said.

Parliamentary opponents of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad say sanctions are not a major cause of Iran's economic problems and accuse his government of mismanaging the economy.

"The first approach today is that authorities accept their mistakes and failures, second, that they not blame their mistakes on others, and third, that they invite all the pundits and experts to find a way to solve the problems of the economy," Iranian legislator Ezzatollah Yousefian was quoted as saying by the Mehr news agency.

Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman told Saturday's Haaretz daily that he believed Iran's Islamic theocracy would be toppled in a revolt like the one that toppled Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak last year.

"The opposition demonstrations that took place in Iran in June 2009 will come back in even greater force," he told the paper. "In my view, there's going to be an Iranian-style Tahrir revolution. The young generation are sick of being held hostage and sacrificing their future."

(Reporting by Ari Rabinovich in Jerusalem. Additional reporting by Yeganeh Torbati in Dubai; Writing by Douglas Hamilton; Editing by Kevin Liffey)
 
.
I feel desperate for the Iranian people :lol:

I dont know what is the need to alienate the whole world while your own people suffer. A nuke, even if it doesnt bring war, will bring international isolation. Ultimately after all this BS, it is the people that will suffer.
 
.
Iran's economy sags under sanctions

By Marc Burleigh (AFP) – Sep 25, 2012

TEHRAN — Iran's oil-dependent economy was showing the strain of punishing Western sanctions on Tuesday, on the eve of a speech by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to the UN General Assembly in New York.

The Iranian currency dived around four percent close to an all-time low against the dollar, while thousands of workers publicly complained of unpaid wages, importers struggled to pay for goods, inflation climbed and travel agencies bemoaned a rapidly shrinking pool of travellers able to afford to go abroad.

Government initiatives to maintain the value of the rial and the volume of oil exports have failed, with both halved from their levels of a year ago.

Iran's leaders, though, are defiant in the face of the Western pressure, vowing to never roll back its nuclear programme as demanded by the five permanent UN Security Council members plus Germany.

Ahmadinejad was expected to stress that defiance in a speech to the annual General Assembly on Wednesday.

Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has already ordered Iran to adopt an "economy of resistance," while officials have told national media to avoid reporting on the "bleak" domestic situation and instead emphasise positive economic stories.

Evidence of the difficulties still surfaced, though, driven by an EU embargo on Iranian oil and US sanctions on financial transactions involving Iran's central bank.

A prominent MP, Mohammad Reza Bahonar, was quoted at the weekend by the ISNA news agency as saying oil exports in June-July had dropped to "around 800,000 barrels per day" -- a low not seen in more than two decades, and less than half the 2.3 million barrels per day of a year ago.

Bahonar's oil export figures roughly tallied with those given by OPEC and the International Energy Agency.

But Oil Minister Rostam Qasemi was quoted by ISNA saying that overall oil production this year "will be the same as last year."

While crude exports were expected to rebound a little in September as South Korea resumed buying some Iranian oil, they were expected to continue well below recent historic levels.

Ahmadinejad early this month also admitted Iran faced "problems" selling its oil, which accounts for nearly half of budget revenues. But he insisted his country would manage. Both he and Khamenei have urged lesser economic dependence on oil sales.

-- Ordinary Iranians struggling --


Iran's government and ordinary citizens alike were struggling with the sanctions, with food costs notably soaring.

The ILNA news agency reported that a letter on behalf of 20,000 workers from across the country was sent to Labour Minister Abdolreza Sheikholeslami complaining they had not been paid and demanding an increase to their salaries of $120 to $285 a month that they said were "way below the poverty line."

Better-off Iranians were cutting back on travel because of the sharply weakened rial.

"Iranians who would have travelled abroad are more likely to go to domestic destinations like Kish or Mashhad," an employee in a small independent Tehran travel agency who gave her first name as Pantea said.

"Many Iranians who used to go on domestic trips simply can't afford it now."

Tour companies trying to fill half-empty flights in the middle of the week to Turkey have taken to trying to sell last-minute flights for as little as $60 return via mass text messages.

A lighting equipment seller in Tehran who gave his first name as Saeed said he was used to importing six shipping containers of goods from China per year, but this year he imported just one.

"I am waiting to what happens to the market and dollar situation," he said. "If these circumstances persist, I may have to close down."

Iranian officials are increasingly focusing on the problems.

"According to the statistics, there is a strong rise in unemployment, and we need to find a solution. Official statistics also show inflation is at 22 percent, which is very high, and in some areas it's even higher," parliamentary speaker Ali Larijani was quoted as saying by ISNA.

The US Treasury official tasked with deploying US sanctions, Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence David Cohen, two weeks ago gave a speech to a law school at New York University in which he said: "Put simply, Iran?s economy is struggling."

He said that was because of the sanctions -- and also "the Iranian government?s continued gross mismanagement of its domestic economy."

He said the slump in oil exports was costing Iran "up to $5 billion a month, forcing the Iranian government to cut its budget because of a lack of revenue."

Cohen said that, as long as Iran refused to negotiate curbs on its nuclear activities, "we will continue to devise new and enhanced sanctions."

Britain, France and Germany are also urging their European Union partners "to further step up the pressure" on Iran. Further sanctions targeting the Islamic republic's energy, finance, trade and transportation sectors are expected to be formally adopted on October 15.

Copyright © 2012 AFP. All rights reserved. More »
 
.
I feel desperate for the Iranian people :lol:

Why are you laughing then?

I dont know what is the need to alienate the whole world while your own people suffer. A nuke, even if it doesnt bring war, will bring international isolation. Ultimately after all this BS, it is the people that will suffer.

Who do you think suffers from sanctions in the first place? The rulers, or the ordinary people?
 
.
Iran’s economy ‘on the verge of collapse’ as currency loses 1/4 of its value in seven days

Yeganeh Torbati, Reuters | Oct 1, 2012 4:58 PM ET | Last Updated: Oct 3, 2012 9:45 AM ET
More from Reuters

un_iran.jpg


Iran’s rial plunged against the U.S. dollar in open-market trade on Monday, taking its loss in value over the past week to more than a quarter in further evidence that Western sanctions are shattering the economy.

The freefall suggests sanctions imposed over Iran’s nuclear program are undermining its ability to earn foreign exchange and that its reserves of hard currency may be running low.

The rial traded at 34,200 per dollar according to currency-tracking website Mazanex, down from about 29,720 on Sunday. It was trading at 24,600 last Monday, according to website Mesghal.

There is no clear sign that economic pain in Iran has reached levels that would prompt the government to compromise on its nuclear program, which Western nations say aims to develop an atomic bomb but which Tehran insists is peaceful.

However, the currency crisis is exposing President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to criticism from enemies in parliament.

The rial’s losses have accelerated in the past week after the government launched an “exchange centre” designed to supply dollars to importers of some basic goods at a special rate slightly cheaper than the market rate.

Instead of allaying fears about the availability of dollars, the center seems to have intensified the race for hard currency by linking the special rate to the market rate, meaning that even privileged importers will face sharply higher costs.

“The government’s initiative … brought to the surface a tremendous lack of confidence in its ability to manage the currency,” said Cliff Kupchan, a Middle East expert at the Eurasia Group, a political risk research firm. “The attempt to fix it triggered a worse crisis via market psychology.”

The exchange centre is operating and once the next phase of the plan is implemented, the price of currency will drop

The rial’s sinking value will fuel inflation, officially running at about 25 percent; economists estimate the real rate is even higher. Rising costs could worsen the job losses which Iranians say are hitting the country’s industrial sector.

On Sunday, Israeli Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz said Iran’s economy was “on the verge of collapse” and estimated the government had lost $45-50-billion in oil revenue because of the sanctions, which have slashed the country’s oil exports and largely frozen it out of the international banking system.

But that kind of language is premature, said Hassan Hakimian, of the School of Oriental and African Studies of the University of London, because Iran has stockpiled some basic goods.

“I am not aware of any shortages of basic necessities as yet,” he said. “Well before that, the government will resort to some kind of basic rationing so as to introduce a safety net.”

The United States and its allies have tightened sanctions this year, notably via a European Union embargo on Iranian oil and U.S. sanctions targeting banks that deal with Iran’s central bank.

In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said sanctions were “cutting deeper and deeper into the Iranian economy” and she urged Tehran’s leadership to change policy on its nuclear program.

The United States and other countries are seeking to intensify pressure on Tehran “so that it will understand that the international community is not going to tolerate Iran with a nuclear weapon,” she added. “They have to make a choice.”

When the exchange centre provides only 10% to 20% of the market’s demand, one cannot expect it any more to play a role in the exchange market

Some Iranian officials continued to insist on Monday that the exchange center, which is supposed to be funded by dollars earned with Iran’s oil exports, would eventually meet demand for hard currency and thus strengthen the rial.

“The exchange centre is operating and once the next phase of the plan is implemented, the price of currency will drop,” said Gholamreza Mesbahi-Moghaddam, who heads parliament’s planning and budget committee, according to the Mehr news agency.

But the rial’s accelerating slide indicates many Iranians have lost faith in authorities’ ability to support it, and are scrambling to buy hard currencies to preserve their savings.

“There is very little, effectively, the central bank and authorities can do to calm the situation because even when they take extraordinary measures to calm the market … the market interprets those additional measures as a sign of abnormality,” Hakimian said.

At the end of last year, Iran had $106 billion of official foreign reserves, enough to cover an ample 13 months of imports of goods and services in normal times, according to the International Monetary Fund.

But Nader Habibi, economist at the Crown Center for Middle East Studies at Brandeis University in the United States, estimated last month that the government now had about $50-70 billion of hard currency reserves left.

Iran does not disclose timely data on its reserves but if they have dropped steeply, the central bank may have become reluctant to run them down by supplying dollars to the market.

In a statement on Sunday, the central bank said just $181 million had been traded on the new exchange center since its launch six days earlier – a fraction of Iran’s imports of goods and services, which total around $2 billion per week in normal times.

“The president has deliberately kept the market agitated,” Elias Naderan, who sits on parliament’s economic committee, said on Sunday, according to Mehr.

“I really don’t know what Mr. Ahmadinejad is thinking. What plan does he have, what is his expectation of the system, and how does he plan to manage this disorder?”

The crisis has also prompted criticism of the central bank and authorities by private businessmen.

“When the exchange centre provides only 10% to 20% of the market’s demand, one cannot expect it any more to play a role in the exchange market,” Mohammad Nahavandian, head of Iran’s Chamber of Commerce, was quoted by Mehr as saying on Monday.
 
.
I feel desperate for the Iranian people :lol:

I dont know what is the need to alienate the whole world while your own people suffer. A nuke, even if it doesnt bring war, will bring international isolation. Ultimately after all this BS, it is the people that will suffer.

First,Iran is not making nuclear weapons.This a lie by warmongers that idiots believe it.

Second,the nuke itself is not a problem.You can see India and Israel have nuclear weapons,and they are in bed with U.S.This is what we call grand hypocrisy.
 
.
Iran is traditionally a trade-surplus nation, like China and Germany.

Which means that they have a healthy cash flow, and a large amount of currency reserves. Enough to handle a situation like this.

The bigger problem is the inflation, which is being made worse by the currency depreciation.
 
.
I feel desperate for the Iranian people :lol:

I dont know what is the need to alienate the whole world while your own people suffer. A nuke, even if it doesnt bring war, will bring international isolation. Ultimately after all this BS, it is the people that will suffer.

What is wrong with you??
It was not so long ago we faced sanctions from US for similar reasons.Stop laughing on other peoples misery.

Here is some thing that will refresh your memory.

http://cns.miis.edu/npr/pdfs/morrow64.pdf

CNN - U.S. imposes sanctions on India - May 13, 1998
 
. .
First,Iran is not making nuclear weapons.This a lie by warmongers that idiots believe it.

Second,the nuke itself is not a problem.You can see India and Israel have nuclear weapons,and they are in bed with U.S.This is what we call grand hypocrisy.

We too faced harsh economic sanctions first in 1974 and further in 1998. It was Pakistan who get away easily because of 9/11 and consequent war on terror.
 
.
Iran is traditionally a trade-surplus nation, like China and Germany.

Which means that they have a healthy cash flow, and a large amount of currency reserves. Enough to handle a situation like this.

The bigger problem is the inflation, which is being made worse by the currency depreciation.


Iran economy is dominated by state owned enterprises which is run on huge subsidy. The inflation is the result of wrong economic policy (subsidy) and sanction just played a part in it.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom