What's new

Iran to UAE : We will crush any act of agression

UAE has nice advanced jets.. they're F-16's are absolutely ruthless. With future Eurofighter or Rafale coming soon.
Iran needs to increase they're air power. UAE has advantage there.. but besides that iran wins in practically every case.
 
.
Even US cant take on Iran, what makes you think a few men in deserts can do against the Persians ?
Come on sir, don't go too far... I like Iran but US could come from both Iraq and Afghanistan, Israel can come from Azerbijan in the North and US base in Saudi from South... Iran is strong country but you are going too far.
 
. . .
Come on,why calling for war? Is one or two island worth millions of man lost and billions wasted?

It is very apparent that Iran has issued a military threat against us didn't it?? Did it not call UAE "Puny and insignificant" in international arena something that it should apologize publicly for?? At least giving the fact that the UAE is the biggest Iranian trading partner and its life line from sanctions??

Just look at these figures to know what I mean:
ec7e681b0b.jpg

800px-Iran_oil_exports_1385_en.jpg
 
. .

+


+


+


+


+


+


So as an advice. Underestimating all of the above is not a very smart thing to do.

What is the combined manpower and number of equipment of all of the GCC and Arab countries that are likely GCC members?

So as an advice. Underestimating all of the above is not a very smart thing to do.
Indeed, underestimating your adversary is the costliest error one can make.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
It is very apparent that Iran has issued a military threat against us didn't it?? Did it not call UAE "Puny and insignificant" in international arena something that it should apologize publicly for?? At least giving the fact that the UAE is the biggest Iranian trading partner and its life line from sanctions??

Yes, that is why I made the 3 posts in this topic before. I do recognise it is Iran who issued the threat for "aggression".

But does geo-politics run on emotions? If it did, the world would already be up in smoke.

Decisions made by military professionals take into account not "who said what" but "how many people will die? how much infrastructure will be damaged? How much will we gain?"

Answer these questions?

how many people will die? Eventually whole GCC will be involved. Dead count will be in millions

how much infrastructure will be damaged? Entire UAE would be destroyed by Iranian missiles. Same goes forIranian cities if GCC gets involved.

How much will we gain? 3 island?

So, are you prepared to sacrifice million men, billion worth of infrastructure for 3 islands?

^ This is how military professionals think.
 
.
Yes, that is why I made the 3 posts in this topic before. I do recognise it is Iran who issued the threat for "aggression".

But does geo-politics run on emotions? If it did, the world would already be up in smoke.

Decisions made by military professionals take into account not "who said what" but "how many people will die? how much infrastructure will be damaged? How much will we gain?"

Answer these questions?

how many people will die? Eventually whole GCC will be involved. Dead count will be in millions

how much infrastructure will be damaged? Entire UAE would be destroyed by Iranian missiles. Same goes forIranian cities if GCC gets involved.

How much will we gain? 3 island?

I always say only an idiot will go out looking for war any war. And as I stated before today we build our countries and war devastate economies however as you can see here clearly we ARE under threat from Iran unlike many of you who keeps asserting otherwise. We have a border dispute with Iran that we have state time and again that we would like to resolve peacefully however Iran due to arrogance refuse to do that. And remember we will NEVER be the ones to fire the first bullet however we WILL defend ourselves if attacked.

What is the combined manpower and number of equipment of all of the GCC and Arab countries that are likely GCC members?


Indeed, underestimating your adversary is the costliest error.

Check this thread out:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/milita...146090-gcc-military-videos-images-thread.html
I have put up numbers there somewhere it took me a couple of hours to put them all together.
Post #67
 
.
I always say only an idiot will go out looking for war any war. And as I stated before today we build our countries and war devastate economies however as you can see here clearly we ARE under threat from Iran unlike many of you who keeps asserting otherwise. We have a border dispute with Iran that we have state time and again that we would like to resolve peacefully however Iran due to arrogance refuse to do that. And remember we will NEVER be the ones to fire the first bullet however we WILL defend ourselves if attacked.

How do you expect to not be the one to fire first bullet? Only way you can gain the island is militarily.

As I said, even though you may be emotional here, generals and higher-ups don't think this way. Every decision is taken after much calculation and feasibility study. If they thought like that, the whole middle east would be up in flames by now. Here we have people posting big videos boasting their military. Things dont work like that in real life.
 
.
Yes, that is why I made the 3 posts in this topic before. I do recognise it is Iran who issued the threat for "aggression".

But does geo-politics run on emotions? If it did, the world would already be up in smoke.

Decisions made by military professionals take into account not "who said what" but "how many people will die? how much infrastructure will be damaged? How much will we gain?"

Answer these questions?

how many people will die? Eventually whole GCC will be involved. Dead count will be in millions

how much infrastructure will be damaged? Entire UAE would be destroyed by Iranian missiles. Same goes forIranian cities if GCC gets involved.

How much will we gain? 3 island?

So, are you prepared to sacrifice million men, billion worth of infrastructure for 3 islands?

^ This is how military professionals think.

Right on target!!

It should be noted that in WW2 the combined death toll of all of the participants was 48,231,700.

Europe (the most technologically advanced continent at the time) lay in ruins and Europeans had to import labor from foreign third world countries because their own working age population was devastated and in case of Germany it was almost completely wiped out.

Weapons in use today are far more deadlier and can wreak more havoc.

All those billions spent on Universities, hospitals, research centers, laboratories, industrial complexes, airports, shipping ports, and so much more will be laid to ruins.

Is it worth sacrificing all of this including the future of ones nation and that too over petty issues like these?
 
.
:cheesy::tup:

We have to take our revenge...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Right on target!!

It should be noted that in WW2 the combined death toll of all of the participants was 48,231,700.

Weapons in use today are far more deadlier and can wreak more havoc.

All those billions spent on Universities, hospitals, research centers, laboratories, industrial complexes, airports, shipping ports, and so much more will be laid to ruins.

Is it worth sacrificing all of this including the future of ones nation and that too over petty issues like these?

Exactly man. I do recognise that it is Iran who is showing an aggressive stance, but here we have people posting big videos of how "powerful"their military. They should remember one quote:

"If your enemy is in range, remember you are too"

Things don't work like this in real life. If it did, whole ME and whole world would be up in flames. In reality, every step is taken after much calculation "How much I will gain? How many people will die? How much infrastructure will be damaged?"
 
.
To be honest guys sadly we Muslims are living in a time that as a community we are pawns.

Lets face it we have had Pax America for the last 20 years or so. The next power on the horizon would appear to be China. They say that when one empire dips and another empire rises there is always strife. In fact in passing of the baton there has always been a war. the question is can America and China change the baton peacefully??

If they can not our numbers and infrastructure will be decimated. They aint gonna fight in China or American mainland. The war will be well over before that
 
.
Exactly man. I do recognise that it is Iran who is showing an aggressive stance, but here we have people posting big videos of how "powerful"their military. They should remember one quote:

"If your enemy is in range, remember you are too"

Things don't work like this in real life. If it did, whole ME and whole world would be up in flames. In reality, every step is taken after much calculation "How much I will gain? How many people will die? How much infrastructure will be damaged?"

You are right GCC countries have invested too much in their countries and people to see it go away in a threat of war like that. As I said we do NOT want war. However saying "Those puny insignificant Arabs" and underestimating us is not healthy for Iran. We rule the air and land if God forbid a battle would arise, however Iranian missiles which will target cities and infrastructure as main targets is too high a price to pay, again I really do hope UAE will solve its border dispute with Iran peacefully because at the end of the day we are neighbors and will remain so for the next 1000 years provided judgement day won't come so it is better to clear misunderstandings now better than later.

To be honest guys sadly we Muslims are living in a time that as a community we are pawns.

Lets face it we have had Pax America for the last 20 years or so. The next power on the horizon would appear to be China. They say that when one empire dips and another empire rises there is always strife. In fact in passing of the baton there has always been a war. the question is can America and China change the baton peacefully??

If they can not our numbers and infrastructure will be decimated. They aint gonna fight in China or American mainland. The war will be well over before that

Just like how Axis and Allies took their fight to north Africa and destroyed it in WW2 with them. Better to remain neutral in the whole thing. The swiss is a good example.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom