95% of modern Irania converted to shiasm forcefully by Turk rulers in 17th century.
one may say they were equally Kurd
by the way I'm very interested to knew from were that 95% come from
Completely agreed with you. But the problem is that Mullahs of Iran are stoking Persian nationalism as large sections of Iranian populace don't have that much religious views. Hence the rivalry right now with KSA is very much a Persian vs Arab thing.
Also Persians still haven't forgotten the Battle of Qadisiyyah. They strongly believe that Arabs defeated them and they don't see that fight as Muslims vs Kafir thing.
we revenged that in
Battle of Rayy and many more battles funny thing is you never see Iranian think about it but non Iranian left an right say Iranian never forget that and want revenge for it .
if t is revenge we take revenge 10 fold.
You can do million of such acts,all of them combine won't belittle Qadisiyyah.
P.S:-Your conversion to Islam+under swords to shiasim in this also.
@Rafi @Kaka420 I hope you don't agree with Persians on this.
shiism in Iran date several hundred years before Safavid if you want to knew. and it was not under sword we destroyed Ummayed and we made Abbasid a vassal of ourselves and then made Mongol commander kill last Abbasid caliph and caliphate once for all .
wonder which was harsher
The one who martyred Hazrat Umar Ibn e Khattab Radi Allah Ta'ala Anhu
the translation is wrong and there is no Saint in the actual writing
the one who sneaky killed Hz. Omar ra. while he was praying... they build a shrine for abu lulu and some made tawwaf
as far as stories go he was only armed with a knife and he was just a mill builder not a warrior and he managed to kill second caliph and when he was surrounded with 15 of the his companions he managed to kill half of them and injure several others and escape to central Iran and live the rest of his live . now tell me if its not showing divine intervention how he managed to do that . and by the way nobody made Tawaf there they go and say a Fatiha ,thee is lots of difference .
Lakh di lanat in bheghairaton par ...
نفرین بر بی شرمانه و بی دینشان
well I say Laa'nat on the persons who added (peace be upon) after the name of the killer of the grandson of the holy prophet after the name of the guy who orders to burn Kaaba .
You might be banned on this forum..
Haven't you seen how shamelessly the posts glorifying the cowardly killing of Umar Radi Allah Ta'ala Anhu go unnoticed?
See this:
that's not glorifying anything that is simple fact , that is cold and old fashioned fact.
But the dog will go directly into hellfire and they will be there with him
not you and not me will decide who go to hell and the one who will decide it yet to share that power with anybody else
This is nothing.. If I show you the pages of their books published in Iran......... you might kill someone....
I suggest drink some cold water instead of killing somebody for it
and you guys complaining of Indian for lynching the people who kill cows.
I don't care who this abu lula is and why he did what he did and why some ppl call him a saint or what the hell ever, even his name is strange to me lol (Abu Lula or Lulu lol) - What I fail to understand is what the hell was he doing in Madina?
Everyone is jumping here and there after hearing the name of Nahavandi yet no one asks what he was doing in Medina.
According to Sunni traditions Nahavandi was a non-muslim, according to Al-Tabari - Nahavandi was a christian, according to Amr ibn Maymun - Nahavandi was a non arab-infidel, according to Sahih al-Bukhari - Umar also describes Nahavandi as a non-Muslim "All the Praises are for Allah Who has not caused me to die at the hand of a man who claims himself to be a Muslim."
Yet no one asks what the hell was a Non-Muslim doing in Medina, forget Madina, he was hiding in Masjid ul Nabawi when he killed Umar ibn Khattab. Why was he allowed in Madina?
the question is why he were forced to go to Medina and why he was not given what was his by right because he was not Muslim ?
and as your story is saying second Caliph knew him ,what was their relation. and what made him so angry so he go and kill Second Caliph and several of his companion . and an interesting question is how he managed to escape thousands of kilometer away after the assassination ? after all he did it in day light and he was only armed with a knife and there was at least hundreds of devout Muslim in Masjid al-Nabi at the time and thousands of thousands between him and gate of Medina
also don't forget at the time Iran was still at war with Arabs , is it strange for an Iranian killing the ruler of the nation who attacked Iran ?
