What's new

Iran reportedly seizes UAE ship days after alleged attack on Saudi oil infrastructure

You can do million of such acts,all of them combine won't belittle Qadisiyyah.
P.S:-Your conversion to Islam+under swords to shiasim in this also.
@Rafi @Kaka420 I hope you don't agree with Persians on this.
Qarmatians, led by an Iranian leader, who claimed royal sassanid descent, even kidnapped/stole the black stone and destroyed Mecca and looted Kaaba, filled the well of zamzam with death bodies, and ababil birds did not appear (Allah supported their struggle against abbasids?).
Not that I support these deeds, but bakistani (ex-hindu) brothers should concentrate on kashmir and should not support the jews against Iran. I've other stories also, but not going to waste my time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qarmatians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Tahir_al-Jannabi

@waz put a hold on ex-hindu's supporting jewish attacks against Yemen, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq.

You might be banned on this forum..

Haven't you seen how shamelessly the posts glorifying the cowardly killing of Umar Radi Allah Ta'ala Anhu go unnoticed?

See this:
Some glorify umayads, abbasids who beheaded familymembers of prophet Mohammad, so these discussions do not help. Some don't agree with umars behaviour towards Fatemeh Zahra for example. So you should respect different views, we don't live in umayad/isis era to impose a certain point of view upon others.

95% of modern Irania converted to shiasm forcefully by Turk rulers in 17th century.
Persians were already part of the proto-shia movement which rised up against umayads in todays Iraq, many shia dynasties in Iran shortly after Islam (buyids for example who killed abbasid caliphs). Also Safavids were earlier than 17th century.
 
.
shiism in Iran date several hundred years before Safavid if you want to knew. and it was not under sword we destroyed Ummayed and we made Abbasid a vassal of ourselves and then made Mongol commander kill last Abbasid caliph and caliphate once for all .
wonder which was harsher
Shiasim was shoved down into Persian throats by Safavidd,that's well known fact.
Mongols:lol:
Same Mongols who sacked Iran:haha:

but bakistani (ex-hindu) brothers should concentrate on kashmir and should not support the jews against Iran.
Same goes for Persian(ex-majosis)stop meddling in affairs of Arabs.
Some don't agree with umars behaviour towards Fatemeh Zahra for example.
Fairy tails.
Qarmatians, led by an Iranian leader, who claimed royal sassanid descent, even kidnapped/stole the black stone and destroyed Mecca and looted Kaaba, filled the well of zamzam with death bodies, and ababil birds did not appear (Allah supported their struggle against abbasids?).
Not that I support these deeds, but bakistani (ex-hindu) brothers should concentrate on kashmir and should not support the jews against Iran. I've other stories also, but not going to waste my time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qarmatians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Tahir_al-Jannabi
Still they were all Muslims who spoke and wrote Persian in style directed by Arabs.
Not many nations have ended up like Persia.
 
.
Shiasim was shoved down into Persian throats by Safavidd,that's well known fact.
Mongols:lol:
I ask you who was Mongol vizier at the time of Bagdad attack and what was his role in killing last abbaside caliph ?

By the way let ask you something. If you are capable of answering a simple question without insulting and name calling .
Safavids never ruled Iraq or Kuwait or Bahrain or KSA persian gulf coast ,how you explain the percentage of Shia there.
More importantly it was shah Ishmael the first ruler of Safavids who cared about Shia and Sunni the rest didn't gave a damn about it . at his time we lost north western iran to ottoman empire and we didn't take it back until his grandson ,shah Abbas the great . can you explan to me how those areas are the bastion of shiism ?

Same goes for Persian(ex-majosis)stop meddling in affairs of Arabs.
When Arabs ,ex Idollers stop meddling in matters of Iranic nations.

Still they were all Muslims who spoke and wrote Persian in style directed by Arabs.
Not many nations have ended up like Persia.
I wonder turkey using cyrilic alphabet means the end of Turkish nation.
 
.
I ask you who was Mongol vizier at the time of Bagdad attack and what was his role in killing last abbaside caliph ?
I don't know about any Vizir but none of his commanders were persian,all were Mongols.He went to Baghdad after destroying Iran.
By the way let ask you something. If you are capable of answering a simple question without insulting and name calling .
Safavids never ruled Iraq or Kuwait or Bahrain or KSA persian gulf coast ,how you explain the percentage of Shia there.
These are all Arabs who trace their conversion back to start of secterian Fitnas,including Zahdis of Yemen,who are now dwindling citing they fact spread of Twelver shiaism.
When Arabs ,ex Idollers stop meddling in matters of Iranic nations.
There is only one Iran,tell me about other so called Iranic nations where Arabs are meddling.
 
.
I don't know about any Vizir but none of his commanders were persian,all were Mongols.He went to Baghdad after destroying Iran.


These are all Arabs who trace their conversion back to start of secterian Fitnas,including Zahdis of Yemen,who are now dwindling citing they fact spread of Twelver shiaism.

There is only one Iran,tell me about other so called Iranic nations where Arabs are meddling.
Not iran but iranic nation and go search it.
And didn't knew Iraqi , Kuwaiti and Bahraini are zaydi not dweller Shia.
The answer is those countries were Shia majority to begin with.
You can't change the religion of people in one night with the help of sword.
 
. . . .
Other then Iran,no place is bastion of Shiaism.
You seems don't want answer my question.
I said explain high presence of shiism in those countries around Persian Gulf .
And asked you how you explain Azerbaijan and zanjan be the bastion of shiism we lost those two province to ottoman empire at the time of shah ismael and he could not made its conversion campain in those two province .

Also if you are talking about iranic nations I said if Arabs stop meddling in those nation we stop our activities in Arab nations.
 
.
You seems don't want answer my question.
I said explain high presence of shiism in those countries around Persian Gulf .
And asked you how you explain Azerbaijan and zanjan be the bastion of shiism we lost those two province to ottoman empire at the time of shah ismael and he could not made its conversion campain in those two province .

Also if you are talking about iranic nations I said if Arabs stop meddling in those nation we stop our activities in Arab nations.
There is no meddling. Iran is supporting its allies and preventing hostile groups from becoming a threat against Iran. Win-win situation.
 
. .
Lol I was just going through this thread and found out most of the posts have been deleted by the mods but some pro arab posts are still here. @925boy you were jumping here and there and reporting to @waz I think - Lol guess what, your post deleted as well in which you quoted me, actually I came back to the thread to reply to you.

@Hack-Hook including yours I believe. :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Man I was trying my best to be polite and I believe I replied in a very polite manner but even my posts were deleted from this thread. Allahu Akbar.

@Irfan Baloch @Arsalan @WebMaster yaar koi saadi gareeban di wi sunan aaala hai ethey k koi naaa? aseee gareeb mud kidayein hor moo kariye :D

And I must say, Inna lillahi wa inna ilayhi raji'un.
 
.
I don't know about any Vizir but none of his commanders were persian,all were Mongols.He went to Baghdad after destroying Iran.


These are all Arabs who trace their conversion back to start of secterian Fitnas,including Zahdis of Yemen,who are now dwindling citing they fact spread of Twelver shiaism.

There is only one Iran,tell me about other so called Iranic nations where Arabs are meddling.
Do you think Sunnis would sit ideal and submit to minority Shia while they had backing of ottoman empire .... Both Selim and Soleiman Qanouni could enter centeral Iran but they couldn't hold it because majority of the Iranian were shiia ...in Soleiman Qanouni era , he had 150,000 solders and Sheybani Uzbek with their army also attacked Iran from north east with massive army , but they couldn't hold anything ....

Shah tahmasp was forced to divide his army and send majority of his army to confront Uzbeks while he tried to stop Soleiman Qanouni with only 7000 troops with doubios loyalty ....
 
.
@Hack-Hook
You're a disgrace.
If other Iranians are like you, then I gotta say I'll lose any respect I had for you people.
You dare to call the martyrdom of one of the Prophet's(Peace be upon him) most favorite companion an act of revenge?!
You & Shapur Zol Aktaf should be permanently banned.You're no better than that misguided Arab supremacist Saif Al Arab.In fact, you might be worse.
I pray Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala guides you to the right path & you repent & revert.

I don't know about any Vizir but none of his commanders were persian,all were Mongols.He went to Baghdad after destroying Iran.


These are all Arabs who trace their conversion back to start of secterian Fitnas,including Zahdis of Yemen,who are now dwindling citing they fact spread of Twelver shiaism.

There is only one Iran,tell me about other so called Iranic nations where Arabs are meddling.
I think I read about this vizier.He conspired with Mongols & convinced the Caliph to open the gates AFAIK.
 
.
I think I read about this vizier.He conspired with Mongols & convinced the Caliph to open the gates AFAIK.
There may have been many but fate of Khalifa was sealed,citing the fact that he wasn't having any Army in hand.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom