Abii
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,690
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
now u r going to make behrain the puppet of iran???
Come back when you have something intelligent to say kid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
now u r going to make behrain the puppet of iran???
AM
On the Army thread about 2 Div. to Saudi and on the Foreign Policy of Dignity Thread, it's repeated over and over that it's in the interests oif the Wahabi princes and their US benefactors to take this whole thing sectarian
Lets be clear about a couple of things:
FIrst who is the Enemy or the bad guy in this play?? There is much instability in the properties of the Wahabi princes, but whose fault is it that there is such instability?? The US and her vassal Princes blame Iran ---- Are people demanding equality before the law the enemy of Pakistan? Are they the enemy of Muslims??
Whose interest are served by turning what is essentially a struggle for civil liberties into a sectarian struggle????
Can't this instability be resolved by having these US supported princes come into the reality that people refuse to accept second class status based on sectarian considerations??
There is a thread "Why Islam in Pakistan turned violent" or something to that effect -- and it was suggested that it is because we refuse to accept pluralism, AM has pointed to this, should we not reflect on this.
On another point - about assistance active or not -- China does more than 40 Billion in trade with India, does that mean that China supports the suppression of Muslims in captive Kashmir??, Obviously not, it's not a well thought out position.
Look, the people, whether they are from Mars or Muslims or whatever, cannot be the enemy, regardless of sectarian considerations
Yes - unilaterally making a decision as a nation to support one side or the other does not inherently mean that the decision is an objective and unbiased one. The proper way to do this would be through the UN as has been the case with Libya.
I mean, if you are going to argue that Iran can unilaterally make a decision to support a particular group in Bahrain, then what about other nations unilaterally doing the same in Sistan-Baluchistan?
At the end of the day the responsibility for what happens is that of the rulers of those States. Pakistanis are merely being recruited for particular jobs in those states - Pakistan is not making the decision to fire on protesters or attack them.
, shias here come to defend the iran illegally and thats my concern..
@ Abii
my friend we are not anti-Iran. We respect Iran for its history and religious places.
Second thing, we are not against Shias. After Iran, Pakistan has largest number of Shia.
Similarily, Ahmedinijad is very popular in Pakistan.
The differences of Governments should not be differences of public.
@ Abii
We are not party in Bahrain game. Saudi Arabia and iran are interfering in Bahrain. So, you should first protest to Bahrain.
Any do you have any knowledge about the role played by the Arab Wahabbis in supporting extremists and terrorists such as the TTP/AQ both financially and through manpower? That role is far more significant and far deadlier for Pakistan than anything Iran is doing or has done.
BTW, on that note, for those arguing that Pakistan is on the wrong side of history in supporting the Arab regimes against the 'Arab people', let me point out that these are the same 'Arab people' who discriminate against Pakistanis (most South Asians actually) and look at them as inferior humans. These are the same 'Arab people' who exploit and humiliate our laborers and workers who sweat and toil in the desert heat for them.
Should we really care if these same 'Arab people' get angry at Pakistan now?
Pakistan has a history of military cooperation with the Arabs and seconding its forces to Arab military arms. This goes back to the Arab-Israeli wars and the need for the Arabs to access well trained military personnel for both training and filling in the gaps, since their own militaries were weak, poorly trained and undeveloped.of course Pakistan isn't.
As I said, your people are being used as cannon fodder and your leaders are allowing it. As an Iranian, I can never serve another army because if I do, I will be in trouble in Iran. This is the same in many countries but with you guys it seems normal lol
I am not against the people achieving a representative government, but I am questioning the criticism of Pakistan here, when the decision to take forceful action against the protestors is that of the Arab governments. Bahrain and Saudi Arabia are not the size of Egypt, Libya and Tunisia - the numbers you are looking at (in terms of protesters that need to be controlled) are almost miniscule in comparison. Like it or not, they can be controlled through force.At the end of the day the majority are shia and most of the Sunni are also asking for freedom. Add 2+2. The puppet govt of Bahrain is falling.
At the end of the day the responsibility for what happens is that of the rulers of those States. Pakistanis are merely being recruited for particular jobs in those states - Pakistan is not making the decision to fire on protesters or attack them.
Iranians, Arabs (their regimes and supporting classes) and the Pakistani political and fundo elite - there is nothing to like or support in any of them.I support Iran for its stance about the Palestinian struggle and its support for Hizbullah but I also condemn its brutalisation of reformists. Sadly when it comes to Arab regimes I don’t find anything to appreciate do you think that makes me a shia now? lol