SIPRA
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2019
- Messages
- 13,549
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Yes. The title is very inappropriate. But the posts of this thread may be merged with some other related thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
big claims chest thumping and all farsibans could manage was hit 2 empty tents! it looks like farsi Mullahs begged usa to allow and launch missiles on their empty tents to save their a** in public!!
so usa can kill all their generals and all iran will do is shout and launch duds?
Not Quite
30 years you can’t take back Kashmir, but now you are talking about how you can challenge the US the lone superpower in war?
Your planes are US made and Chinese copy of US fighters. You have no real navy. Your missile industry cannot directly challenge the US. You suffer from some of the same problems as Iran.
So unless you planning to fire a nuke and get turned into glass, I am curious how Pakistan would challenge the US in war?
If US sanctions Pakistan from receiving any oil and gas like they did to Japan prior to Pearl Harbor how will you survive? You will then need Iran to break sanctions and smuggle oil into your country.
Pakistan is not energy independent and it’s exports are largely textile based that can be replaced by many other neighboring countries. US can crush Pakistan economy without ever having to go to war.
You are missing the point. Pak doesn't challenge US nor it gives threat to US. This is Iran where the whole leadership is giving threat to US i.e. breaking the leg of US, will punish US but in the end the whole world saw such a pathetic attack on US bases where there was no causality.
What was the point of such a extreme rhetoric if the whole leadership had to go for face saving afterwards.
why american didn't respond?You are missing the point. Pak doesn't challenge US nor it gives threat to US. This is Iran where the whole leadership is giving threat to US i.e. breaking the leg of US, will punish US but in the end the whole world saw such a pathetic attack on US bases where there was no causality.
What was the point of such a extreme rhetoric if the whole leadership had to go for face saving afterwards.
why american didn't respond?
trump didn't talk about casualty he said if you hit we would hit ..Because there was No causality. Its simple.
But it is a slap in a face anyway and US steps back...what a shame.Because there was No causality. Its simple.
trump didn't talk about casualty he said if you hit we would hit ..
View attachment 598973
View attachment 598974
View attachment 598975
But it is a slap in a face anyway and US steps back...what a shame.
no I talked about american president comments & threats .. so again why american didn't respond?You talk about breaking the leg of US, punishing US severely, making ME graveyard of US soldiers and what else. Then you came with such a pathetic attack where few bricks and couple of garages are broken with not a single US military causality. Next time throw a stone on US bases and claim your victory if US doesn't respond back.
Its not a slap on US as US didn't lose anything. It is Iran who lost its top general. Then 52 mourners died for him. Then 176 more died when plane was shot down. We saw 4-5 days of continuous mourning on TV and then Iran fired few missile on US bases and destroyed couple of garages and some bricks and claiming this as victory.
Because there was No causality. Its simple.