What's new

Iran leadership is coward and liar

Status
Not open for further replies.
A nato puppet who can't drink a glass of water without asking daddy USA is calling Iran cowards.
Well that's what the world thinks and rightly so, Iranian leaders are cowards. I don't remember an attack on NATO members that wasn't followed by retaliation.
 
.
After all their words is that all the 'revenge' they can get? A fake and staged missile strike with only 4 missiles on target, without proper payload and alerting the Americans so that there would be no US casualties? It's a farce, an insult to the Iranian people. It means the leadership of the regime are very weak, they fear any US action. So the message to the world from Iran is that Americans can do all they want, even killing Khamenei wouldn't cause war nor a real retaliation. Even the dead poor Taleban armed with only AK47 kill more American soldiers.

they are men with balanced head .

Well that's what the world thinks and rightly so, Iranian leaders are cowards. I don't remember an attack on NATO members that wasn't followed by retaliation.

retaliation can follow on later .
 
.
So ZERO casualties, alerting Americans is now called a retaliation. That's a new definition on the dictionary. But only idiots believe it. Trump is chanting with joy, he wouldn't be that happy with a real retaliation
Zero casualties has not confirmed by Iran yet furthermore Iranian commander Hajizade has said that the at least 9 c-17 sorties took place from Ain Al Assad to evacuate the wounded to Jordan, isreal and the fact that they have intell and doc on it .... I am waiting for more details ...
Beside all of it it was clear that Iran was gonna attack, ameican have developed early warning systems & satellites to monitor everywhere surly they knew Iran was preparing & moving missiles that's why they evacuated Taji base ... so it was expected by everyone and they prepared themselves the only thing that mattered was its timing...we didn't alert american but it was just a verbal message to Iraqi PM in order to respect their sovereignty.
Trump is not chanting with joy, he is under Qs by congress and media to release its proofs and House voteed to limit Trump's war powers ... Iraq passed the law and asked for them to leave ...
american base has attacked for the first time since ww2 and american president response was proposing talk and peace to Iran ... so if you think he is happy now then have fun 'cause he tweeted any attacks on american :

If Iran attacks an American Base, or any American, we will be sending some of that brand new beautiful equipment their way...and without hesitation!
or
They attacked us, & we hit back. If they attack again, which I would strongly advise them not to do, we will hit them harder than they have ever been hit before!

it's 2 days .. I think instead of lecturing Iran on definitions of "alerting" or "retaliation" on the dictionary you gotta lecture Trump on hesitation, attack, Base, hit, harder and so on ....
 
.
Well that's what the world thinks and rightly so, Iranian leaders are cowards. I don't remember an attack on NATO members that wasn't followed by retaliation.
NATO as if NATO are independent countries. They're bunch of Euro+T lapdogs of USA who are threatened with sanctions for trying to import Russian GAS (Northstream 2 project). Go play somewhere else kid.
 
.
We can say we're an old country, the name of Iran is at least 1800 years old, actually longer (from parthian era). We existed as a country and because of our long history it was natural that once a while we would be occupied, as any other empire in the world. We survived and still exist.

Rajputs and british? o_O

However many countries did not exist, they are not older than 75 years for example. A grandpa could be older than these fake new identities, many times created based on ethnicity or religion. If that's not the case, you'll recognize them from straight borders, drawn by foreign powers. Sometimes both of these elements together formed a new fake country.


A nato puppet who can't drink a glass of water without asking daddy USA is calling Iran cowards.

@waz
Please ban these trolls.


very true .
 
.
Zero casualties has not confirmed by Iran yet furthermore Iranian commander Hajizade has said that the at least 9 c-17 sorties took place from Ain Al Assad to evacuate the wounded to Jordan, isreal and the fact that they have intell and doc on it .... I am waiting for more details ...
Beside all of it it was clear that Iran was gonna attack, ameican have developed early warning systems & satellites to monitor everywhere surly they knew Iran was preparing & moving missiles that's why they evacuated Taji base ... so it was expected by everyone and they prepared themselves the only thing that mattered was its timing...we didn't alert american but it was just a verbal message to Iraqi PM in order to respect their sovereignty.
Trump is not chanting with joy, he is under Qs by congress and media to release its proofs and House voteed to limit Trump's war powers ... Iraq passed the law and asked for them to leave ...
american base has attacked for the first time since ww2 and american president response was proposing talk and peace to Iran ... so if you think he is happy now then have fun 'cause he tweeted any attacks on american :

If Iran attacks an American Base, or any American, we will be sending some of that brand new beautiful equipment their way...and without hesitation!
or
They attacked us, & we hit back. If they attack again, which I would strongly advise them not to do, we will hit them harder than they have ever been hit before!

it's 2 days .. I think instead of lecturing Iran on definitions of "alerting" or "retaliation" on the dictionary you gotta lecture Trump on hesitation, attack, Base, hit, harder and so on ....
And you think someone believes these lame excuse by the regime? Nobody believes it, even the most idiotic person in the world understands Iran ran away. Zero casualties is the new world record of US victory.
 
.
A fake and staged missile strike with only 4 missiles on target, without proper payload and alerting the Americans so that there would be no US casualties? It's a farce, an insult to the Iranian people.

We don't know if there were any casualties. US has lied before about casualties, in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

Afghan villagers went to US forces to ask them to stop dumping dead soldiers in their rivers as it was tarnishing the fish and water.

Truth will come in time.
 
.
After all their words is that all the 'revenge' they can get? A fake and staged missile strike with only 4 missiles on target, without proper payload and alerting the Americans so that there would be no US casualties? It's a farce, an insult to the Iranian people. It means the leadership of the regime are very weak, they fear any US action. So the message to the world from Iran is that Americans can do all they want, even killing Khamenei wouldn't cause war nor a real retaliation. Even the dead poor Taleban armed with only AK47 kill more American soldiers.
Not really they made deal with the Americans to kill soleimani and trump let them stage a fake revenge to save face infront of their people
 
.
We don't know if there were any casualties. US has lied before about casualties, in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

Afghan villagers went to US forces to ask them to stop dumping dead soldiers in their rivers as it was tarnishing the fish and water.

Truth will come in time.
USA never lie about casualties, only about exact numbers. If there were casualties the media would find out immediately. The satellite images are another proof there were no casualties, the level of destruction is minimal. Plus Iranians alerted the Americans so it's all coherent with zero casualties.

Not really they made deal with the Americans to kill soleimani and trump let them stage a fake revenge to save face infront of their people
Possible, this would also be an insult to the Iranian people
 
.
USA never lie about casualties, only about exact numbers. If there were casualties the media would find out immediately. The satellite images are another proof there were no casualties, the level of destruction is minimal. Plus Iranians alerted the Americans so it's all coherent with zero casualties.


Possible, this would also be an insult to the Iranian people

You don't know the US war machine then. They are professional liars.

Fighting a 19 year losing war against sheep herders and farmers in Afghanistan and suffering heavy losses. Until last year, you all thought they were winning.
 
.
You don't know the US war machine then. They are professional liars.

Fighting a 19 year losing war against sheep herders and farmers in Afghanistan and suffering heavy losses. Until last year, you all thought they were winning.
So is Soleimani alive? The US war machine is functional. The casualties in Afghanistan have been known since 2001.
 
.
Iranian are cowards through out their history from Alexander to mongols.from Turks to Arabs.from Rajputs to British. Every one ruled them

Behave.

You can call the Iranians many things, but coward is not one of them. They are on the other end of that spectrum, almost to a fault.

So is Soleimani alive? The US war machine is functional. The casualties in Afghanistan have been known since 2001.

You have poor English comprehension. Indian perhaps?

The list of PDF trolls is growing by the minute, now we got this Italian Silent Fighter guy who taken the full-time job of creating and ruining every Iranian thread.

@waz @Serpentine

Please keep an eye on these new threads popping up, nothing but Iran bashing.

Silent Fighter is a new member who has taken upon himself to woefully bash Iran and Iranians for no good reason.

Please take care of these useless messages.

Probably another troll who was banned before, doubt he is Italian.
 
. .
Soleimani was a general and a politician. So a proportional revenge is to assassinate one US general and one US ambassador to a ME country
 
.
Soleimani was a general and a politician. So a proportional revenge is to assassinate one US general and one US ambassador to a ME country
No because Trump would retaliate. So if Iran 'doesn't want war' then it's always the same thing. Iran's chance of retaliation was to hit US bases with real damage. They backed down so they will back down again and again.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom