OK, so it boils down to this.
(1) Pakistan has to take counter-measures. What are they? You don't know, but there must be some, otherwise Pakistan would lose, and THAT could never happen, right?
Have you any specific information about why it would be a one-sided slaughter? Actually, there is reason to believe that there might well be a one-sided slaughter, but perhaps we are thinking of different sides.
(2) Are you sure you know anything about the topic being discussed? About the Kargil hostilities? Just to refresh our memory, when your soldiers occupied the mountain-tops, which Indians did they chase away? When?
(3) What support? Pakistan denied any involvement from the beginning, so it is mysterious that there is now supposed to have been support. What support was the Pakistan Army giving the infiltrators? Anything you want to remind us about?
(4) I have reason to believe that you are right. And there is good reason, therefore, to reduce your forces to 110,000 soldiers in the PA, in order to match the handful of soldiers in the whole Indian Army in a ratio of 10:1.
LOL.
Needs to be protected as carefully as any other rare species.
What a nasty thing to say! Don't you know that the umpires and referees are thoroughly biased?