Indian woman is stripped naked and has her eyes gouged out before being beaten to death and incinera

[Daghalodi]

Unlike islam, hinduism is not in denial.

The age of marriage for hindus have consistently risen based on social, political and cultural relevance.

Manusmriti is for the Satya yuga which is more than 15,000 years old. Mahabharata was for an age more than 5000 years old.

Gautama smriti is for an age more than 6000 years old.

Hindu smiriti change with time, unlike the child marriages in islam.

Just a few centuries back 33-year-old King John of England married 12-year-old Isabella of Angoulême.

But unlike the islamic and christian "laws", a hindu is not allowed to consume the marriage by law.

BTW the age of Aisha was six and the marriage was consummated when she was 9.

Will someone please ban this maderchod before we start posting how hindu gods have been raping each other?

 

[wiseone2]

You may have rejected certain laws, but hundred of millions still follow them.
A lot many child marriages do take place in India?
Please do provide examples in Islam were we are still following the 7th Century Laws which are in human now?

We have moved away from child marriage as a society
to the degree it is followed it is dictated by economics and illiteracy
the most important thing is that it is declining
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_India

As a religion polygamy is not banned in Islam. any guess as to when you will get around to ban it ?

 

[Gadkari]

We have moved away from child marriage as a society
to the degree it is followed it is dictated by economics and illiteracy
the most important thing is that it is declining
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_India

As a religion polygamy is not banned in Islam. any guess as to when you will get around to ban it ?

In case you are confused, these girls are their WIVES, not their daughters. This is Islamic Turkey.

 

[Sully3]

shining India

share this news on all social media platforms especially with you western friends so that Indias true face is exposed.

 

[Daghalodi]

In case you are confused, these girls are their WIVES, not their daughters. This is Islamic Turkey.

Please share a link to the pics you have posted

Meanwhile the story you are speaking of shri ram (which is the incarnation of Lord Vishnu) and devi seeta is related to

Shiva Purana, Rudra Samhita 2, Yudha Khanda 5, Ch 23.38-45 ”On seeing her husband, Vrnda too was delighted. She forgot her sorrow. She considered everything a dream. Delighted in the heart and with all the dormant passions kindled up, she sported with himfor many days in the middle of that forest. Once at the end of the sexual intercourse she realised that it was Visnu. Vrnda rebuked him angrily and spoke thus. Vrnda said:—Fie on this misdeed of Visnu in outraging the modesty of another man’s wife. I have now realised you as the wielder of illusion, appearing in the guise of an ascetic. Sanatkumara said:—O Vyasa, saying thus in great anger she showed her brilliant powers as a staunch chaste lady by cursing Visnu. “O base foe of the Daityas, defiler of other people’s virtue, O wicked one, take this curse from me, greater in force than all persons. The two persons whom you made to appear in front of me shall become Raksasas and abduct your wife. You will be distressed on account of separation from your wife roaming about with Sesa ‘lord of snakes’ who posed as your disciple here. You will seek the help of monkeys in the forest.”


This story is also supported by Skanda Purana II.iv.21-10-24, Shiva Purana, Rudra Samhita 2, Yudha Khanda 5, Ch 41 verses 1-35, Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Prakriti Khanda 21.18-31 and also mentioned in Devi Bhagavatam 9.24.14-22 with a slight variation

 

[wiseone2]

In case you are confused, these girls are their WIVES, not their daughters. This is Islamic Turkey.

I have a hard time believing Turkey is at this stage

shining India

share this news on all social media platforms especially with you western friends so that Indias true face is exposed.

we have a better image than land of the pure will ever have because that is reality

Get used to it

 

[Gadkari]

Please share a link to the pics you have posted

Meanwhile the story you are speaking of shri ram (which is the incarnation of Lord Vishnu) and devi seeta is related to

Shiva Purana, Rudra Samhita 2, Yudha Khanda 5, Ch 23.38-45 ”On seeing her husband, Vrnda too was delighted. She forgot her sorrow. She considered everything a dream. Delighted in the heart and with all the dormant passions kindled up, she sported with himfor many days in the middle of that forest. Once at the end of the sexual intercourse she realised that it was Visnu. Vrnda rebuked him angrily and spoke thus. Vrnda said:—Fie on this misdeed of Visnu in outraging the modesty of another man’s wife. I have now realised you as the wielder of illusion, appearing in the guise of an ascetic. Sanatkumara said:—O Vyasa, saying thus in great anger she showed her brilliant powers as a staunch chaste lady by cursing Visnu. “O base foe of the Daityas, defiler of other people’s virtue, O wicked one, take this curse from me, greater in force than all persons. The two persons whom you made to appear in front of me shall become Raksasas and abduct your wife. You will be distressed on account of separation from your wife roaming about with Sesa ‘lord of snakes’ who posed as your disciple here. You will seek the help of monkeys in the forest.”


This story is also supported by Skanda Purana II.iv.21-10-24, Shiva Purana, Rudra Samhita 2, Yudha Khanda 5, Ch 41 verses 1-35, Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Prakriti Khanda 21.18-31 and also mentioned in Devi Bhagavatam 9.24.14-22 with a slight variation

Why don't you provide the link to your claims before seeking proof from others ? Where is the link to your claims about Shiva puran ?

https://theinternationalreporter.or...-party-aims-to-pardon-3000-statutory-rapists/

 

[Jlaw]

Imagine what they will do to white women in 2030 when whites will be slaves of Indians

 

[Gadkari]

I have a hard time believing Turkey is at this stage

That is your problem. But Denial is not a river in egypt.

https://theinternationalreporter.or...-party-aims-to-pardon-3000-statutory-rapists/

 

[wiseone2]

That is your problem. But Denial is not a river in egypt.

https://theinternationalreporter.or...-party-aims-to-pardon-3000-statutory-rapists/

under Erdogan they are going back to the Ottoman era

 

[Soulspeek]

I would humbly request you to read actual Valmiki Ramayana Sarga 118 before commenting that Sita maiya was not ridiculed. She did not chose fire for enjoyment. There was no way left fir her after Shri Ram, her own husband, said such words to her.

Dont go by interpretation by katha-vachaks. Go by the actual text written in 118. In further sarga, it is clarified that it was all plan of Shri Ram to prove chastity of Sita Maiya in front of the world. (If this was the case, Lord Ram would not have again left Sita after reaching Ayodhya.) This proves that the seed of doubts which were planted in Lanka had taken deep roots by the time they reached Ayodhya.

I am not ridiculing anyone. It was just an observation of a person. Your opinion can be different from mine and there is noting wrong about it. Human being as a whole is opinionated.

The problem is not the intention of Lord Ram. The problem is that the onus of proving her chastity always fell on Sita Maiya. Till date women are expected to remain virtuous while proving her purity time and again while men are free of any such boundation. Its a comment on the Society of that time and present time.

I haven't read valmiki ramayana or any other text. I know ramayana as my grandmother told me. And I bet you most of Hindus know their religion as their grandparents told them. It is beauty of Hinduism it is not spread by any books but from parents to their children. And may there be any reason but Shree Ram gave choice to Devi Sita either enter pyre or he will not accept her. This is forcing Devi Sita to enter pyre.
We may have differences but I follow my religion rationally.

 

[navtrek]

its very sad that such stupidity still exists on this subcontinent. horrific incident

yup i totally agree. people here still have very primitive beliefs.

 

[Gadkari]

I would humbly request you to read actual Valmiki Ramayana Sarga 118 before commenting that Sita maiya was not ridiculed. She did not chose fire for enjoyment. There was no way left fir her after Shri Ram, her own husband, said such words to her.

Dont go by interpretation by katha-vachaks. Go by the actual text written in 118. In further sarga, it is clarified that it was all plan of Shri Ram to prove chastity of Sita Maiya in front of the world. (If this was the case, Lord Ram would not have again left Sita after reaching Ayodhya.) This proves that the seed of doubts which were planted in Lanka had taken deep roots by the time they reached Ayodhya.

I am not ridiculing anyone. It was just an observation of a person. Your opinion can be different from mine and there is noting wrong about it. Human being as a whole is opinionated.

The problem is not the intention of Lord Ram. The problem is that the onus of proving her chastity always fell on Sita Maiya. Till date women are expected to remain virtuous while proving her purity time and again while men are free of any such boundation. Its a comment on the Society of that time and present time.

Why don't you stick to the bible rather than pretend to be a critique of something your barely understand ?

If you divorce your wife, is she going to jump into a fire and burn herself ? Why such double standards for Devi Sita ?

Hinduism is not bound by christian morality so there is no bar on a women remarrying or even taking multiple husbands.

The addition to Rama leaving Sita after reaching Ayodhya is not part of the original Valmiki Ramayan.

I hate to educate bigots like you, so why don't you stick to the bible ? seriously.

Next time you feel the urge to "educate" Hindus about "Hinduism", DON'T. Recognize the bigot in you and take a deep breath and stop pretending to be a Psudo hindu.

 

[AndrewJin]

Such a backward feudal country

 

[Soulspeek]

This is what happens when you try to hold a sane discussion with a dumbass religious fanatic. Their egos get all fired up. Never try to bring up bible christian thing to me. I don't get offended by such things. When I see bad in Christianity, I duly admit it. I am not a religious fundoo.

I take out the best from all religions and try to implement in my life. Origin of that knowledge does not matter to me. I am kinda peer-fakeer mentality. I dont get insulted by religious taunts. Infact I expect it from all padris, molvis, bhakts of the world.

Why don't you stick to the bible rather than pretend to be a critique of something your barely understand ?

If you divorce your wife, is she going to jump into a fire and burn herself ? Why such double standards for Devi Sita ?

Hinduism is not bound by christian morality so there is no bar on a women remarrying or even taking multiple husbands.

The addition to Rama leaving Sita after reaching Ayodhya is not part of the original Valmiki Ramayan.

I hate to educate bigots like you, so why don't you stick to the bible ? seriously.

Next time you feel the urge to "educate" Hindus about "Hinduism", DON'T. Recognize the bigot in you and take a deep breath and stop pretending to be a Psudo hindu.