Contrarian
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 11,571
- Reaction score
- 4
True. They are unfounded.Current Pakistani claims are unfounded while if India literally diverts the flow on design it would make Pakistani claims legitimate. Most Pakistanis dislike India regardless of the water issue if Pakistani government listen to the citizens there would be a war every other year lol.
But the Pakistani public is still convinced that India is stealing their waters. So if then they can not force Pakistani Govt to take any action, what would change when India actually starts doing it.
Again, bear in mind, that even when India starts to channel some of the river waters to other rivers, the river flow in Pakistan would not be majorly affected. It would make a minor difference at best.
What would prevent Pakistani Govt from first posturing, then going back to their public claiming that India has accepted their terms and has promised/treatised to ensure proper water supply in the rivers that flow to Pakistan? Show it as yet another positive outcome for Pakistan and its military forces ability in coercing India, to the domestic audience?
Because I think that is the logical outcome.
You are assuming that because India would link the rivers, it would mean a major change in the river water volume of rivers that flow onwards to Pakistan. That is not the case.