Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
canals r not used to interlink rivers?? U got to be kidding me. The rivers which u had stopped under indus water treaty were interlinker by existing rivers through barrages and canals in order to keep them running. Barrages may not be used directly for interlinkages but they do play a critical role in storing waters so that they can be shifted through canals from one place to another.Barrages are used to control the amount of water passing through the structure amd canals are also not used for interlinkin rivers.
The first link you gave is totally out of context.
Second link talks about list of barrages and dams.
Third link talks about barrages on Indus river.
Canal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediacanals r not used to interlink rivers?? U got to be kidding me. The rivers which u had stopped under indus water treaty were interlinker by existing rivers through barrages and canals in order to keep them running. Barrages may not be used directly for interlinkages but they do play a critical role in storing waters so that they can be shifted through canals from one place to another.
wikipedia?
Because excess water during rainy season will be needed to store in reservoirs which will then be circulated across river system during draught using high capacity pumps. Yes we are not talking about draining the river dry and we are also not talking about a drop of water during summer when we already face water crunch.
You are making it sound so simple and harmless, however sundarbon is infinite times more important than some canals.
What difference would it make.I know what he meant, the end result would be the same diverting those rivers to go into India would directly affect the flow into Pakistan and Pakistan would have no choice but to go to war because it would be dead anyway.
What difference would it make.
Its not as if we are not used to fighting Pakistan each decade in which thousands die. At least in this case, millions of Indians would benefit.
And for Indians, the life of an Indian is worth more than a Pakistani. Im sure its vice versa for Pakistanis but the ball is in India's court.
Sorry, but thats just hyperbole.Before Indians could get to see any benefits a war would break out, a war Pakistan cannot win which means it would just hope both lose you can guess the end result.
Ofcourse. You are right.@Contrarian
Dont worry hindus are not good enough to take panga with us. Any linking with our rivers mean end of Bharotis ganga filthy people.
Sorry, but thats just hyperbole.
You are free to it, but the results on the ground would be otherwise.
Pakistan would stand down after losses with something or the other as a face saving measure. The usual.
Again, I doubt it.Fights over land is different than a fight over water. Pakistan's existence is not in jeopardy if it never gets kashmir but diverting the rivers is a whole different matter. There are definitively red lines where those fancy weapons will finally be forced to come into play.
Again, I doubt it.
I think the regular will happen.
Pakistani public is absolutely convinced that India is stealing waters, yet there has been absolutely no reaction.
What makes you think it will be any different when river interlinking projects are completed? Its not as if any of the rivers will be run dry(including the ones that flow to Pakistan), a minimum level will be maintained in each river for ecological reasons as well as for human consumption.
So why would Pakistan complain more than the usual?
so you are saying all the water are for pakistan and should not take any drop of it?Current Pakistani claims are unfounded while if India literally diverts the flow on design it would make Pakistani claims legitimate. Most Pakistanis dislike India regardless of the water issue if Pakistani government listen to the citizens there would be a war every other year lol.
The usual will be your *** getting spanked, midget from ganga filth.