SitaramVillas
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2015
- Messages
- 244
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Well if that's the case then you should also write off the muslim chronicles of killings... Would you do that?
No, I would not because Jains had a literary tradition of chronicling their history while Hindus did not have. That is the difference. So while Hindus were not writing down stuff that happened to them in North India, the Jains and the Buddhists did note down their history rather meticulously.
Well if that's the case then you should also write off the muslim chronicles of killings... Would you do that?
I don't care about Abdalis or Ghoris but Tipu did not torment his own populace but the enemy populace, Ask the Kannadigas, they will answer you....
Wow why are you not posting the complete text? He also mentioned what I previously posted... Selective quoting haan
Nope he did not. The very paragraph I quoted makes it abundantly clear that who killed were warriors and not civilians. Even the quote Sameet produces earlier does not talk of women or children being killed.
So if you want to count that in, then you should also count hindu court chronicles.... As simple as that
And speaking of your second point, Well if that is what you say then show me the links to prove that as I can prove otherwise...
There was no Hindu court chronicles. As stated it is a legend and one that is mostly floated by the Marxist.