What's new

Indian double standard on Kashmir issue. From Kashmir to Junagarh

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The ruler of Junagarh State signed instrument of accession to Pakistan. The state was taken over by India on religious majority grounds as it's population was pro-India. Compare this to Kashmir and you will see double standard at it's fullest.
 
The ruler of Junagarh State signed instrument of accession to Pakistan. The state was taken over by India on religious majority grounds as it's population was pro-India. Compare this to Kashmir and you will see double standard at it's fullest.

What has happened has happened, move on. You cannot change history.
 
History set the precedent.

If I were the PM of India in 1947, I would have allowed Junagarh's accession to Pakistan because that is how all 500 odd princely domain have acceded either to Pakistan or India. Now time passed...as I said move on.

Yup , but its Kashmir

But why this obsession with a tiny patch of land called Kashmir? You lost BD, you forgone development, you build many bombs and given unbridled power to your military that your have become a security state, you created environment for many terror group to inflict thousand cuts on India. now the same snake is biting you. May I ask is it a Muslims thingy just because majority of Kashmiris are Muslims?
 
The ruler of Junagarh State signed instrument of accession to Pakistan. The state was taken over by India on religious majority grounds as it's population was pro-India. Compare this to Kashmir and you will see double standard at it's fullest.
All nations have double standards,you had Baluchistan ,we have kashmir ,,chill move on dont be stuck in the past.
 
The ruler of Junagarh State signed instrument of accession to Pakistan. The state was taken over by India on religious majority grounds as it's population was pro-India. Compare this to Kashmir and you will see double standard at it's fullest.
Let me be honest with you. In this world only rule that applies is jiski lathi uski bhains. No one cares about what is right or wrong as long as you have the might. USA and USSR had committed a lot of atrocities but nobody could do anything about it. If Pakistan were stronger than India they would have waged a war and occupied remaining part as well. Thank gods for the Nukes as now neither side dares to make an advancement.
 
Yes Bangladesh was a lesson for Pakistan

Decade of Indian "involvment" in Pakistan bore fruit in the form of Bangladesh. Not due to Pakistan.

In these days India is very active all over Pakistan, same policy, in Balochistan, Karachi, Sindh, KP, There are indian agents everywhere which dance to indian music.

Let me be honest with you. In this world only rule that applies is jiski lathi uski bhains. No one cares about what is right or wrong as long as you have the might. USA and USSR had committed a lot of atrocities but nobody could do anything about it. If Pakistan were stronger than India they would have waged a war and occupied remaining part as well. Thank gods for the Nukes as now neither side dares to make an advancement.


You are right, this is the principle in this zalim dunya..
 
Last edited:
Decade of Indian "involvment" in Pakistan bore fruit in the form of Bangladesh. Not due to Pakistan.

In these days India is very active all over Pakistan, same policy, in Balochistan, Karachi, Sindh, KP, There are indian agents everywhere which dance to indian music.
Are We Allies or what ???
 
Back
Top Bottom