What's new

Indian Americans more successful than other immigrant groups in the US

.
read post 19 by the op himself? and you blaming us for ruin it?
Agreed. he shouldn't have. It was completely wrong.

Having said that I have seen that poster today and one of Chinese member, Anarchy 99 is copy pasting same posts offensive to Indians. Posters like him also get into indians nerves and when entire PDF is bombarding you with cheap banters, from Bangladeshis, Pakistanis to Chinese etc., one just loose its mind.

Even I could have gone against Chinese considering his posts.

Also look at another Pakistani's comment who is typing in bold, making worse remarks than what this guy did.

I completely agree with your justification but you can have avoided just like I avoided that Pakistani.

I have one question and answer me honestly. One Indian made you angry, think when posters from different countries say worst thing about you, your religion, your country's poor state of health and topics like toilets, malnutrition, using banned topics. Would you have not gone berserk ?
 
.
You walk into fortune 50 company and see hardly any chinese. well other than across the street at some restaurant. On the other hand you see many Indians in fortune 50 up the management ladder ( besides software geeks)

OH really ? dont you know one of the co founder of yahoo is chinese, one of the co founder of you tube is also chinese:rofl:
 
.
You walk into fortune 50 company and see hardly any chinese. well other than across the street at some restaurant. On the other hand you see many Indians in fortune 50 up the management ladder ( besides software geeks)

LOOK this trait of being near bottom of the immigrant population by the Chinese is replicated worldwide, I bet. it's no US phenom, although your chances of best being successful is in the US.

Yes, it is rare to find a Chinese heading MNCs, but plenty of Indians head international firms including Anshu Jain, the CEO of Deutsche Bank AG :lol:
 
.
You walk into fortune 50 company and see hardly any chinese. well other than across the street at some restaurant. On the other hand you see many Indians in fortune 50 up the management ladder ( besides software geeks)

LOOK this trait of being near bottom of the immigrant population by the Chinese is replicated worldwide, I bet. it's no US phenom, although your chances of best being successful is in the US.

Hey DN, i'm with you on this one, Indians in US are simply "super" may i have the honor to add more to your greatness, don't forget to thank me:lol:
36% Indian-American Scientists at NASA - Democratic Underground
 
. .
Because interpretations are interpretations and are not facts. It is like saying China is successful because American consumers buy Chinese goods :lol:

Sure, but just to dismiss my interpretation as ignorance is also not a fact by itself. You as well as Jayatl failed to explain why Koreans, Japanese as well as Western Europeans don't do so well in the US as an immigration group.
 
.
Also look at another Pakistani's comment who is typing in bold, making worse remarks than what this guy did.

That 'Pakistani' sounds like a false flagger, and an amateur one at that. Sounds like someone wanted to spice up this thread and give it life.
 
.
Yes, it is rare to find a Chinese heading MNCs, but plenty of Indians head international firms including Anshu Jain, the CEO of Deutsche Bank AG :lol:

It's because China has plenty of top 500 companies to work for while Indians have to work for foreign companies?

BTW, Deutsche Bank is heading downwards and Ackermann called Anshu Jain a loser.
 
.
That 'Pakistani' sounds like a false flagger, and an amateur one at that. Sounds like someone wanted to spice up this thread and give it life.
Pointing out how few people get into people's nerve and the same old dirty game starts :enjoy:
 
.
what's the lunch special today?

Here you go DN:lol:
lZYj5.png
 
.
Götterdämmerung;3454820 said:
Sure, but just to dismiss my interpretation as ignorance is also not a fact by itself. You as well as Jayatl failed to explain why Koreans, Japanese as well as Western Europeans don't do so well in the US as an immigration group.

Let me give two more interpretation of the table

1) Chinese are not able to compete with Indians in US and hence returning back to their China (A different way of looking at your own interpretation)

2) Chinese lack essential skills to be successful hence are not able to grow to high paying positions and remain at the bottom of the ladder.

So which is true ?

Fact is Indians are the highest earning diaspora in US, and that is what matters. With money comes influence, and they are one of the reasons for close Indo US ties.
 
.
Götterdämmerung;3454820 said:
Sure, but just to dismiss my interpretation as ignorance is also not a fact by itself. You as well as Jayatl failed to explain why Koreans, Japanese as well as Western Europeans don't do so well in the US as an immigration group.

Don't know about others. I told you why Chinese fail . Just like when you claim yourself to be a journalist because you post on forums and have a blog.

I bet you guys are at the bottom of ladder in Germany too- not unique to the US . This study is about settled immigrant population not about folks on a work or student visa.

and 300 million Chinese doing well out 1.6 bil when you are 2nd highest in GDP is not some laurel you can hang your hat on.
 
. .
Let me give two more interpretation of the table

1) Chinese are not able to compete with Indians in US and hence returning back to their China (A different way of looking at your own interpretation)

2) Chinese lack essential skills to be successful hence are not able to grow to high paying positions and remain at the bottom of the ladder.

So which is true ?

Fact is Indians are the highest earning diaspora in US, and that is what matters. With money comes influence, and they are one of the reasons for close Indo US ties.

Both, as top profession( restaurant work)of their immigrant class is indicative and supports your theory above. Factual and quite brilliant analysis I may add :lol:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom