kṣamā
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,145
- Reaction score
- -23
- Country
- Location
Saary sir ji, but he seemed to have resemblance to a close associate.Dont Ask Such Info.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Saary sir ji, but he seemed to have resemblance to a close associate.Dont Ask Such Info.
Most Aircraft's DO GO for the most powerful engine available. Everything else is a compromise.
You can't fabricate nuclear fuel and can fabricate a miniaturized reactor, *all by yourselves*.......... in just one go, that too by not going through the learning curve of designing a totally indigenous world-class diesel-electric submarine......... who are you kidding? Give the credit to Russian design bureau, where it's due, which in this case points to the whole damn submarine.
Most of your *break throughs* are like a transparent glass, from Agni to K series, the whole world can see through them, other than Indian awam, and that too, some highly educated Indian awam. Don't you guys stop at some point and think, why, how, wtf sometimes - or you're fed "indigenous" koolaid from your pre-school days?
K thanks for confirming you are an idiot. No consideration for MTBO, sfc, endurance and numerous other factors that come into play in engine selection. Nope just ignore everything else, go for power!!!
And you basically claim the Arihant, an SSBN to be a 37 knot sprinter.....laughable.
Done talking to you, probably a teenager who thinks numbers on wikipedia is the be all, end all.
Its obvious you are bitter that not one sensible person would believe a 47,000 hp shaft output on a 6000 ton submarine that is a SSBN....that too from a 83 MW reactor....for multiple reasons.
You won't wait and see ( because you know reality is going to bite you in the *** pretty badly)....so you decide to run in your circular logic ad infinitum with 0 technical background to back it up.
But hey if its enjoyable for you, keep on going....and see how many people actually genuinely believe anything you say. Start a twit circus. Has anyone actually supported your claims here?
Maybe you are a daily bhaskar fan or something.
INS Arihant: All you want to know about India’s first nuclear-powered submarine - daily.bhaskar.com
With such quality reporting like:
How does a nuclear submarine works?
and this shoddy copy and paste job:
Length: 111 m (364 ft)[1]
Beam: 15 m (49 ft)[1]
Draft: 11 m (36 ft)[1]
Propulsion: PWR using 40% enriched uranium fuel (80 MWe );[1] one turbine (47,000 hp/70 MW); one shaft; one 7-bladed, high-skew propeller (estimated)
with [1] as a source they simply forgot to mention when they copied it from wikipedia. Comedy.
Right, they totally designed the whole sub for India, and it's own SLBMs. At the same time it can't even pass through a cruise missile beyond 290km. Save that butt hurt for some where else.
Only thing the defense world sees through is your Chinese drones, N Korean missiles, "JV" jets and tanks, etc
Dada,perhaps one day in the future we'll see our own "Typhoon class" version in the I.N. service.Just imagine a fleet of 5 Typhoon class sub patrolling the length and breadth of the Indian OceanIndia always wanted a larger Submarine, the only constraint was the power of the reactor. I see that constraint being removed, and there's no holding back going for a relatively larger submarine.
As per all reports Arihant continues to be a 83.5 MW powered Submarine with a 70 MW steam turbine. You can continue to go around in circles claiming all sort of "expertise" and cherry picking to suite you argument. There are plenty of sensible people who believe a 35 MW output for Arihant and all of them have reported it and that is how that figure exist on the internet.
Dada,perhaps one day in the future we'll see our own "Typhoon class" version in the I.N. service.Just imagine a fleet of 5 Typhoon class sub patrolling the length and breadth of the Indian Ocean
Considering that all major SSN and SSBNs which are twice your arihant's tonnage require much less than 35MW shaft power, your assertion that 35MW powers the SSBN is simply laughable.
Also, no current SSBN in the world ( US/USSR with more than 40 years of history in operating nuclear subs) has speeds anywhere near to 30 knots and neither did they feel the need of it but somehow india which is taking baby steps in designing a nuke reactor felt it prudent to design a reactor having ability to propel the SSBN at speeds of 35 knots+ just in case ??
Man you are one incorrigible idiot !
By all sources IAC 2 has been reported to be a Nuk powered AC. It means it would mostly have emals and reacter power research for more than 100MW is on
Arihant 2 shall have 125 MW reactor which is either complete or in advance stage of completion. So 100 MW is absolutely not a problem at all.
Rise of India’s Nuclear Submarine fleet-Aridaman by Year end, 50% Powerful reactor under constructi
Look at the thread.
Arihant 2 shall have 125MW (50% more powerful) reactor.
BARC has started working on New high powered Pressurized water reactors (PWRs) according to BARC Scientist new reactor will be 50% more powerful than 83 MW reactor used on Arihant. BARC want to use it on larger SSBN which will be follow-up on Arihant class and which will require more power since it will bigger platform. Navy also wants bigger PWR for New SSN class of submarines which according to navy requirements will see 100% jump in additional power requirements compared to one used in Arihant class. BARC still not clarified which Pressurized water reactors (PWRs) are in development or different Parallel development are been carried out of PWR for SSBN and SSN.
Source: Rise of India’s Nuclear Submarine fleet-Aridaman by Year end, 50% Powerful reactor under constructi
I still dont understand wwhy are you folks bickering about? If anyone has any issues then why not produce a scientific literature to back their claim? Firstly no arihant can't go 44knots as someone above pointed out, it is absolutely wrong
Secondly pdf link or any other blog link doesn't constitute what is known as credible literature. I mean that guy sudesh chari hasn't attached any links in support of his claims