I S I
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2015
- Messages
- 9,673
- Reaction score
- -32
- Country
- Location
BC insaan, i was talking about 1971 war.Nuke to humare pass bhi hai, hum bhi koi halwa le kar nhi bethe.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BC insaan, i was talking about 1971 war.Nuke to humare pass bhi hai, hum bhi koi halwa le kar nhi bethe.
You give me exact date of invading IndiaPlease give me exact date when will Shri Narinder Nath Modi Ji will destroy Pakistan
mighty of brave IA?? my foot
taking advantage of civil war using terrorists and having 50:1 after getting F^&ked in anus by PA in 65 what a brave army just try to remember how many brave monkeys lost their life in last stand off i.e 2002
Lol running away from question just like typical bhartees btw we never intended to invade India its just a group of over malnourished saffronis who always keep talking about destroying PakistanYou give me exact date of invading India
Lol running away from question just like typical bhartees btw we never intended to invade India its just a group of over malnourished saffronis who always keep talking about destroying Pakistan
it is with us.. and it universal truth.. what ever you thinkHalf of Kashmir was stolen from the then King Hari Singh. Not from India. Which came as a blessing to India and now Kashmir will always be part of India. Legally.
yaar pale wo buliding tu free kerwaha loo... first get your building empty... then talk to me...okyit is with us.. and it universal truth.. what ever you think
to make you happy.. now ready for other part too lol
Keep it up. Very sound intelligentLol running away from question just like typical bhartees btw we never intended to invade India its just a group of over malnourished saffronis who always keep talking about destroying Pakistan
One quotes 71 war because that was the last war India went into, pakistan may not be the same pakistan of 71, and no way is India the same sanctioned, economically weakened, isolated India of 71. So the results may not be any different from 71 as the balance of power is even steeper.
Whatever turns you guys on keep dreaming. Pakistan is here to stay and India can not do a THING about it. It has tried and failed.What makes you so sure that pakistan will remain intact...nukes?, nukes did not help USSR from disintegrating, and pakistan is no USSR.
India thinks twice before reciprocating? This is laughable. Every one knows, India has been the biggest sponsor of terrorism in the world and has got every country beaten to punch in this area. Heck, over the course of the last half century, India has sponsored and perpetrated terrorism and aggression against all its neighbors; creating terrorist groups, destabilizing and blockading neighbors to do its strategic bidding and sponsoring subversion, sabotage and terrorism in various parts of Pakistan thus killing innocent civilians. The worst form of state terrorism, a war crime, that India has continued to perpetrate to destabilize its neighbors. All of your propaganda is principally to deflect global attention from the Indian terrorism. Get off this litany of falsehoods about Pakistan and a travesty of facts and history.The reason why India thinks twice to reciprocate pakistani terrorism and proxy games is because pakistan is a destitute nation that has nukes and terrorists in abundance...its the north Korea of south Asia.
Don't you worry about Pakistan's sugar daddies. The only thing that is keeping India in check is the Indian fear of massive retaliation by Pakistan, if that's not the case, then try your luck and bring it on. Chinese will come later.Having sugar daddies and thinking that the sugar daddies will come to its rescue every time is not going to save it. The only thing that's keeping it intact is
India's restraint and the assumption that the chinese will jump into the mix.
though that was not the original point of the poster...as far as surgical strikes goes then one of us is going to be dead wrong...only time will clarify...so no point in talking about it...no??Just meant to show that Cros borders attacks and its history sets a very bad precedent regarding the infamous encounter
Fair enough....so you agree that extended history say's otherwise...now lets talk about recent history...Not really, at least not in the recent history.
Who fed you all this?? Do you guys even question once?? care to explain if it was India who went crying to Uncle Sam then what was Nawaz doing there uninvited during their independence day?? So as per you Vajpayee cried on phone and Nawaz went there to personally take medals??In kargil, you went crying to uncle clinton,
in 2001 parliament attacks you wasted billions and went back disheartened, after mumbai there were empty threats again, after pathankot there was still nothing but empty whining and now your claiming to have conducted these fairy tale sirjeekal strikes that have been thoroughly debunked and proven as totally fake and has turned you into a laughing stock in the world. So no, history does not contradict his statement, it advertising confirms it.
But disclaimer here, I'm talking about the ACTUAL history, not bollywood version of history. Yes, I agree that in the bollywood version, even CHINA is scared of india.
Uhm, actually no, last time YE hua tha
Fair enough....so you agree that extended history say's otherwise...now lets talk about recent history...
Well if you want to talk extended history then recall that we ruled you for a 1000 years and also broke you into multiple countries during the partition.
Who fed you all this?? Do you guys even question once?? care to explain if it was India who went crying to Uncle Sam then what was Nawaz doing there uninvited during their independence day?? So as per you Vajpayee cried on phone and Nawaz went there to personally take medals??
nawaz's cowering in front of the u.s. is well known on account of his looted wealth hiding there. Of course he would go running after vajpayee complained to uncle clinton since uncle clinton knows exactly how to use nawaz's ill gotten wealth against him. Remember that musharraf said that he planned kargil on nawaz's orders but nawaz miscalculated clinton's intervention big time.
This is actually the whole problem...Pakistan mind unfortunately don't get it...It is a simple rule - To start a conflict you need to cover all aspects...Geo-politics is one of them...Now look at your history...your planners are all brawn and no brain...India has come a long way...No doubt 2001 parliament attack was a set back...because we learned that mobilization took awful lot of time and lost any possible objective...what we did?? we improvised...however we never let the diplomatic offensive off...It will take a whole page if i start writing diplomatic victories here...so will refrain...but will conclude that Pakistan used to be a counterweight to India in SAARC and right now looking at regional isolation literally...Now as far as surgical strikes is concerned then we both have a very different version...so no point in discussing...
Understand that saarc has next to significance, it's a tea time club and nothing more. So much for isolation that you got the mayor of two roads in kabul, bhutan and bd to support your claim that what is happening on kashmir is not human rights violations by an occupying force but a terrorism issue. Most of the real world is calling it grave human rights catastrophe which is exactly Pakistan's claim. You must have a very strange definition of isolation.
The above rant defy's intellect so i will leave it there...
Hey, it's from your media.
Rational....though that was not the original point of the poster...as far as surgical strikes goes then one of us is going to be dead wrong...only time will clarify...so no point in talking about it...no??
Yes and the other side has been by staging fake encountersthough that was not the original point of the poster...as far as surgical strikes goes then one of us is going to be dead wrong...only time will clarify...so no point in talking about it...no??
India is a country accountable to Parliament where things are not hidden.