What's new

India successfully tests Nirbhay cruise missile

. . .
WHAT KIND OF WEED ARE U SMOKING?

You are comparing K-4, K-15, Agni-5, Agni-4 and Agni-3 with pakistani missiles!! go compare with trident-2 or bulava. :lol:

Guys, ignore this fun, and move ahead.

Oh come on now,the fun just started and you are telling us to move on!!That's so mean of you.:mad:
 
.
Let's argue what's wrong with your post - apart from it being offtopic:


Only part remotely on topic.

Offtopic and false: 2nd biggest.


Off topic and false: 4rth gen.


Offtopic


False: no input from any country regarding subsonic cruise missile or the real problem - turbofan.


Offtopic


Offtopic, accusations without proof and personal ranting coming after giving someone negative rating for the same.

All of this to explain how Nirbhay is a copy of tomahawk:

Your post barely touched the topic, and didn't explain how USA helped India or how Nirbhay resembles Tomahawk.

Interesting a collective attack. So amusing the answers.

population 1, China, 1,367,340,000, October 17, 2014, 19%, Official population clock. 2, India, 1,261,080,000, October 17 2014

Yet India counting is less reliable then China counting.

LCA being 4th generation? When? Not now. Planned sure.

I do not think it is an issue fro India to buy of the market. The space program was not bang a cyrogenic engine. Kaveru was not bang working. Neither is it hard to believe you just builded and engine. If it was that easy there would be a lot more nations having CM.

Whether it is off topic? Just read what you guys with Indian flag and non Indian names write.
 
.
Prahaar is a tactical BALLISTIC missile, go check DRDO, a Mobile battlefield missile support system, NOT a CRUISE Missile. It is a MBRL. Prahaar is still highly an unstable system, with very in accurate guidance system, and still hits target above 10 meters, which is sadly not good enough. Pragati is export variant of Prahaar Missile, which nobody is interested to buy ever from India. Prahaar as u rightly said, is still not deployed yet in mass regiments of Indian Artillery Army.


While am listing you Babur 1, Babur 2, NASR land based Cruise Missiles and RAAD, is Pakistan air launched Cruise Missile far ahead to anything Indians has.

All four types of Pakistani Cruise missiles, are in mass production, highly accurate, advanced electronic, and in full deployment, India has no match against it, except the Russia-indo Brahmos.

And as far as Ballistic Missile capability, Pakistan has a big, mighty answer for Ballisitc Missiles, where India cannot even play a catch up game.

Bro, believe me, SFC is not interested in Prahaar, and unstable? How you know this. BTW, Prahaar is for Artillery Regiment, and always be. BTW, where the hell I say it is a cruise missile. You have a query, I am replying it.

BTW, how you know that India have no match of Pak cruise missile, you have some inside knowledge of Indian Missile Program, please share with us.
 
.
17-nirbhaylaunchnew.jpg
10438568_651478088282853_7472355932142888360_n.jpg
 
.
'Less than' 10 meter brother,we have our own way with words.Like previously the Nirbhay's range was reported to be more than 700 kilometers.And present CEP of Prahaar NLOS BSM is with RLG INS only,wait till our IRNSS comes online,then you get the glimpse of the true potential of Indian missiles.

And besides,your Nasr is in no way a cruise missile,it's a same system like Prahaar only with one third the range and payload!!

And coming to your Babur,congrats with that.You have it deployed only because you guys started like 15 years earlier than India and still it is fitted with an engine that is generations behind the one on board the Nirbhay prototype!!Says a lot about the military industrial complexes and R&D base of the respective countries.

And for Ballistic missiles,what you say was true like 8 years ago son,the reality has totally changed and India has already snatched the pace.The gap has widened beyond any catching up, you got that correct...............only it is in our favor.

No Prahaar is not same as NASR, NASR is nuclear capable, miniaturized nuclear capability, called Battlefield Nukes for limited range....India doesnot even have the concept of miniaturized battlefield nukes missile system, with tactical capability. Small tactical missile nuke is the main capability of NASR...very hard to make.

Secondly, i was talking of target point, target range, target hit range of more than 10 m, and you start talking abt distance range of 700km and that too from a MBRL, mobile system and India developed it, on its own...LoL.

Well Pakistan has been listening for long enough these madeup Indian threats, 'wait for new missiles', 'will', 'india's a super power', 'india's economy is world fastest growing', 'Indian has new indigenous atomic missile' etc etc. Well not to discourage Indians from dreaming.....Its a good laugh for Pakistanis.
 
. .
No Prahaar is not same as NASR, NASR is nuclear capable, miniaturized nuclear capability, called Battlefield Nukes for limited range....India doesnot even have the concept of miniaturized battlefield nukes missile system, with tactical capability. Small tactical missile nuke is the main capability of NASR...very hard to make.

Secondly, i was talking of target point, target range, target hit range of more than 10 m, and you start talking abt distance range of 700km and that too from a MBRL, mobile system and India developed...LoL.

Well Pakistan has been listening for long enough these madeup Indian threats, 'wait for new missiles', 'will', 'india's a super power', 'india's economy is world fastest growing', 'Indian has new indigenous atomic missile' etc etc. Well not to discourage Indians from dreaming.....Its a good laugh for Pakistanis.

You even know about indian nuclear weapon,

what was sub-kiloton nuclear test in Pokharan-2? Isnt it was miniaturized, dont be in any kind of delusion.

What exactly Pakistan got which is so big and mighty that India can't catchup? Can you list the types and range available with both countries? Can you tell why are Indian BM not sufficient for Pakistan, and why Pakistan had to develop cruise?
How Prahar is unstable system? How NASR is a cruise missile? How accurate are Pakistani cruise missiles (CEP)?

The reason of Pak cruise missile was Indian BMD program.
 
. .
Prahaar is a tactical BALLISTIC missile, go check DRDO, a Mobile battlefield missile support system, NOT a CRUISE Missile. It is a MBRL. Prahaar is still highly an unstable system, with very in accurate guidance system, and still hits target above 10 meters, which is sadly not good enough. Pragati is export variant of Prahaar Missile, which nobody is interested to buy ever from India. Prahaar as u rightly said, is still not deployed yet in mass regiments of Indian Artillery Army.


While am listing you Babur 1, Babur 2, NASR land based Cruise Missiles and RAAD, is Pakistan air launched Cruise Missile far ahead to anything Indians has.

All four types of Pakistani Cruise missiles, are in mass production, highly accurate, advanced electronic, and in full deployment, India has no match against it, except the Russia-indo Brahmos.

And as far as Ballistic Missile capability, Pakistan has a big, mighty answer for Ballisitc Missiles, where India cannot even play a catch up game.
Why are you arguing?

Yes, Pakistan is far ahead of India in technology.

Let the Indians live in their dream world. Why waste your effort on Indians who do not know these basics yet keep pretending.
 
.
#FridayFury: India's subsonic cruise missile Nirbhay scores a Perfect 10 - News Oneindia

India on Friday added an inspiring chapter to her book on ‘Home-Grown Weapons', when its nuclear-capable, sub-sonic cruise missile Nirbhay scored a Perfect 10 during its launch from the Integrated Test Range (ITR) in Chandipur. The missile took off from the Launch Complex-3 of ITR at 10.05 am and successfully completed the mission parameters within an hour (11.02 am). Military sources confirm to OneIndia that the missile is capable of flying as low as 5 meters and can attain a maximum height of 5 km. Nirbhay gives Indian armed forces deep-strike capabilities and can be launched from land, ship and submarine. The missile is developed by Bangalore-based Aeronautical Development Establishment (ADE), with over a dozen DRDO labs joining hands in the project. During Friday's launch, Nirbhay travelled a total of 1050 kilometers and hit the designated target area with an accuracy of 5-6 meters, which is also known as CEP (Circular Error Probable). Sources say that with a seeker coming on board the missile during future launches, Nirbhay is expected to hit the target with offer an accuracy of 1-2 meters. Hyderabad-based DRDO lab Research Centre Imarat (RCI) is engaged in the development of a desi seeker. The RCI also played a key role in Nirbhay's success by providing a redundant navigation system, control actuation system and battery. "The missile navigated through all the 17 way points," a top official said. Capturing Nirbhay's outing on video was a Jaguar deep-penetrating strike aircraft of the Indian Air Force. Thrilled DRDO Chief says more variants in the offing For DRDO Chief Dr Avinash Chander, Nirbhay's second outing was critical to ward off critics, who were waiting in the wing to pounce on him, with the first attempt of the missile (March 2013) being only partially successful. "Mission successful! We have done it. It's a great day for DRDO and missile scientists in India. We are now confident of attempting smarter versions of the missile. This will add new dimensions to our armed forces' capabilities," Dr Chander told OneIndia from the Block House in ITR. A visibly joyous DRDO chief went on to add that Nirbhay demonstrated the capabilities to carry heavy payload giving confidence to its makers. "We are now ready to add more teeth to the missile. We need to integrate the terminal guidance system to make the missile more lethal. It will be then capable of homing on to specific targets," Dr Chander said. Commenting ADE for finally making the missile follow their script right from the word go and till the pre-planned end-game near the safe zone (target area), Dr Avinash said that the lab will have its hands full for the next 10 years. "As I see it, ADE is currently on a well-chartered flight-path with a number of critical projects in their kitty. Our efforts will be now to have Nirbhay indicted into the Navy within three years followed by the Army an year after that. The air force version should be out in the next six years," the top missile scientist said. Ready for crucial briefing with Defence Minister: DRDO DG A top DRDO team led by Dr K Tamilmani, Director General (Aeronautical Systems) is expected to brief Defence Minister Arun Jaitley on Saturday (Oct 18) about Nirbhay. "We will be meeting the Defence Minister with the complete mission parameters Nirbhay has achieved. Integrating the missile was a huge challenge with multiple agencies being involved. We will be briefing the minister about the benefits Nirbhay will offer to the Services," Dr Tamilmani, who oversaw ADE's progress in developing the missile on a daily basis, said. The team is also expected to brief Jaitley about the possibilities Nirbhay will offer to all three Service wings. "It has been tough days for the Nirbhay team and everyone was under tremendous pressure. We stuck to our plans and never let the focus shift. When you develop complex weapon platforms, it's unfair to call challenges as delays," Dr Tamilmani said. A perfect Diwali gift, says ADE boss According to P Srikumar, Director of Aeronautical Development Establishment (ADE), Bangalore, Nirbhay performed more than what was expected. "It's a great achievement for all of us. Nirbhay was loaded with technology challenges and today one by one we demonstrated how we overcame them. A submerged air intake, which is just a hole in the belly of the missile and deployment of folded wing into the flight configuration are two critical technological challenged we overcame in this project. Deriving inspiration from today's successful launch, we are confident of building on the foundation thereby converting Nirbhay into an excellent missile system," Srikumar said. "Most of the designers in all our partner labs are youngsters, whose confidence will grow in leaps and bounds with the successful launch of Nirbhay. We have tapped the capabilities of over a dozen DRDO labs for this project. I couldn't have asked for a better Diwali gift," the ADE director said. Dr K G Narayanan, former ADE director said that the Nirbhay's success is the logical extension of the work in the field of unmanned systems such as Lakshya and Nishant. "Though I am not fully familiar of the technology used in Nirbhay, it is a great achievement by our scientists," Dr Narayanan said. More than satisfied; exciting days ahead: RCI Director Dr G Satheesh Reddy, DRDO's ‘missile magician' and RCI Director was probably one man who knew what a successful outing for the missile could do to his entire team. "We are more than happy and more than satisfied. We have more challenges ahead and my team of young scientists will right away get on to our next mission of making Nirbhay, a smarter weapon system. We had to wait for over an year after the first launch and today every system that we developed stuck to the designated task," Dr Satheesh said. Celebrations at ADE The news of the Nirbhay's successful launch was greeted with great fanfare at the ADE campus in C V Raman Nagar. "It's a great day for India. It's a great day for DRDO and ADE. We will wait for the Nirbhay team to return and they have really slogged in the last two years. This success has come after a mild set-back we had last time and hence it is a great sense of relief for us. Nirbhay has gifted us a great sense of satisfaction," B Mahalingam, technical staff officer to ADE director, said. He said that celebrations will continue till the entire Nirbhay team lands back in Bangalore. "We are expecting everyone by mid of next week. We will celebrate this success, which I think we truly deserve," Mahalingam added. Incidentally, Nirbhay is the first missile DRDO developed in Bangalore.

Read more at: #FridayFury: India's subsonic cruise missile Nirbhay scores a Perfect 10 - News Oneindia
 
. .
Interesting a collective attack. So amusing the answers.

population 1, China, 1,367,340,000, October 17, 2014, 19%, Official population clock. 2, India, 1,261,080,000, October 17 2014

Yet India counting is less reliable then China counting.
Right, Indian counting is wrong and you know the real numbers!


LCA being 4th generation? When? Not now. Planned sure.
Check the requirements for 4rth generation. Check the configuration of LSP aircrafts.

I do not think it is an issue fro India to buy of the market. The space program was not bang a cyrogenic engine. Kaveru was not bang working. Neither is it hard to believe you just builded and engine. If it was that easy there would be a lot more nations having CM.
Right, all nations are willing to help Indian space program so that India may become a competitor to there own. And Kaveri is working, but not to the IAF required specs.

Whether it is off topic? Just read what you guys with Indian flag and non Indian names write.
And yes, your post was offtopic. You didn't clarified how Nirbhay is a copy, just your theories regarding how nothing works in India, and how international community is lined up to help Indian R&D to progress! Some accusations on Indian PM and so on. Whatever the last part is supposed to imply...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom