Sam Manekshaw
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2014
- Messages
- 1,765
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Then u better act like TTADo not act like a mod.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then u better act like TTADo not act like a mod.
Here the proof Pakistani Missile capability far ahead to India:
Never tested ???? North Korea and China Imported?
without a single navigation satellite... Pakistan claiming pinpoint accuracy for babur.... yeah anything possible for a divine country!!!
WHAT KIND OF WEED ARE U SMOKING?
You are comparing K-4, K-15, Agni-5, Agni-4 and Agni-3 with pakistani missiles!! go compare with trident-2 or bulava.
Guys, ignore this fun, and move ahead.
Let's argue what's wrong with your post - apart from it being offtopic:
Only part remotely on topic.
Offtopic and false: 2nd biggest.
Off topic and false: 4rth gen.
Offtopic
False: no input from any country regarding subsonic cruise missile or the real problem - turbofan.
Offtopic
Offtopic, accusations without proof and personal ranting coming after giving someone negative rating for the same.
All of this to explain how Nirbhay is a copy of tomahawk:
Your post barely touched the topic, and didn't explain how USA helped India or how Nirbhay resembles Tomahawk.
Prahaar is a tactical BALLISTIC missile, go check DRDO, a Mobile battlefield missile support system, NOT a CRUISE Missile. It is a MBRL. Prahaar is still highly an unstable system, with very in accurate guidance system, and still hits target above 10 meters, which is sadly not good enough. Pragati is export variant of Prahaar Missile, which nobody is interested to buy ever from India. Prahaar as u rightly said, is still not deployed yet in mass regiments of Indian Artillery Army.
While am listing you Babur 1, Babur 2, NASR land based Cruise Missiles and RAAD, is Pakistan air launched Cruise Missile far ahead to anything Indians has.
All four types of Pakistani Cruise missiles, are in mass production, highly accurate, advanced electronic, and in full deployment, India has no match against it, except the Russia-indo Brahmos.
And as far as Ballistic Missile capability, Pakistan has a big, mighty answer for Ballisitc Missiles, where India cannot even play a catch up game.
'Less than' 10 meter brother,we have our own way with words.Like previously the Nirbhay's range was reported to be more than 700 kilometers.And present CEP of Prahaar NLOS BSM is with RLG INS only,wait till our IRNSS comes online,then you get the glimpse of the true potential of Indian missiles.
And besides,your Nasr is in no way a cruise missile,it's a same system like Prahaar only with one third the range and payload!!
And coming to your Babur,congrats with that.You have it deployed only because you guys started like 15 years earlier than India and still it is fitted with an engine that is generations behind the one on board the Nirbhay prototype!!Says a lot about the military industrial complexes and R&D base of the respective countries.
And for Ballistic missiles,what you say was true like 8 years ago son,the reality has totally changed and India has already snatched the pace.The gap has widened beyond any catching up, you got that correct...............only it is in our favor.
pragati is an export variant of prahar... gud thing is they thought about exporting it and the bad thing is... our armed forces are yet to accept it!!you forgot pragati
No Prahaar is not same as NASR, NASR is nuclear capable, miniaturized nuclear capability, called Battlefield Nukes for limited range....India doesnot even have the concept of miniaturized battlefield nukes missile system, with tactical capability. Small tactical missile nuke is the main capability of NASR...very hard to make.
Secondly, i was talking of target point, target range, target hit range of more than 10 m, and you start talking abt distance range of 700km and that too from a MBRL, mobile system and India developed...LoL.
Well Pakistan has been listening for long enough these madeup Indian threats, 'wait for new missiles', 'will', 'india's a super power', 'india's economy is world fastest growing', 'Indian has new indigenous atomic missile' etc etc. Well not to discourage Indians from dreaming.....Its a good laugh for Pakistanis.
What exactly Pakistan got which is so big and mighty that India can't catchup? Can you list the types and range available with both countries? Can you tell why are Indian BM not sufficient for Pakistan, and why Pakistan had to develop cruise?
How Prahar is unstable system? How NASR is a cruise missile? How accurate are Pakistani cruise missiles (CEP)?
went to watch cricket at 3 page was s 24... Now 44..
Missile was test fired in morning.But thread is still flying.
Why are you arguing?Prahaar is a tactical BALLISTIC missile, go check DRDO, a Mobile battlefield missile support system, NOT a CRUISE Missile. It is a MBRL. Prahaar is still highly an unstable system, with very in accurate guidance system, and still hits target above 10 meters, which is sadly not good enough. Pragati is export variant of Prahaar Missile, which nobody is interested to buy ever from India. Prahaar as u rightly said, is still not deployed yet in mass regiments of Indian Artillery Army.
While am listing you Babur 1, Babur 2, NASR land based Cruise Missiles and RAAD, is Pakistan air launched Cruise Missile far ahead to anything Indians has.
All four types of Pakistani Cruise missiles, are in mass production, highly accurate, advanced electronic, and in full deployment, India has no match against it, except the Russia-indo Brahmos.
And as far as Ballistic Missile capability, Pakistan has a big, mighty answer for Ballisitc Missiles, where India cannot even play a catch up game.
Awesome pics bro.
Right, Indian counting is wrong and you know the real numbers!Interesting a collective attack. So amusing the answers.
population 1, China, 1,367,340,000, October 17, 2014, 19%, Official population clock. 2, India, 1,261,080,000, October 17 2014
Yet India counting is less reliable then China counting.
Check the requirements for 4rth generation. Check the configuration of LSP aircrafts.LCA being 4th generation? When? Not now. Planned sure.
Right, all nations are willing to help Indian space program so that India may become a competitor to there own. And Kaveri is working, but not to the IAF required specs.I do not think it is an issue fro India to buy of the market. The space program was not bang a cyrogenic engine. Kaveru was not bang working. Neither is it hard to believe you just builded and engine. If it was that easy there would be a lot more nations having CM.
And yes, your post was offtopic. You didn't clarified how Nirbhay is a copy, just your theories regarding how nothing works in India, and how international community is lined up to help Indian R&D to progress! Some accusations on Indian PM and so on. Whatever the last part is supposed to imply...Whether it is off topic? Just read what you guys with Indian flag and non Indian names write.