yeah u r right, its a classic example !!!!
of a country (in this case China) mollycoddling another country (in this case my country, Pakistan) to further its interest. When we will learn, that China is just using us to keep India engaged on the this front and nothing much.
We should stop listening to what India does or China says .... the rot is in our system ... and China wont even bother to help us out in that ... It is us who have to make our hands dirty ...
There maybe facts in what you state, however, I presume this is what is called realpolitik and geostrategy.
It is true that China only had kind words to say during the Indo Pak conflicts and that was about all. Be it 1965 or 1971. In fact, in 1971, the US wanted China to open the second front but it never did. The US assured that should USSR attack China, the US would intervene.
1971 War: How the US tried to corner India
Notwithstanding, from purely from the geostrategic point of view, the Pakistan China axis against India is a natural corollary.
I would not say that China is better at curbing corruption, more like China has had effective leadership and planning in-spite of corruption while India continues to allow corruption to affect the important steps in its development.
That is the charm of the workings that make totalitarian regimes successful in nation building at the expense of the freedom of its people. USSR and China re good examples of how totalitarian regimes can raise impoverished and illiterate nations to be shining beacons, but at the expense of freedom as individuals.
On the other hand, the freedom of the individual is axiomatic but development is chaotic and wayward.
Take Pakistan itself. It is a democracy and it has so many problems. Had it been a totalitarian regime, religion would have been controlled along the straight and narrow and there would be no Taliban gnawing at Pakistan's innards. And if it attempted to raise its ugly head, it would have been brutally nipped in the bud as China did to the Tibetans and to the Muslim Uyghurs of East Turkmenistan.
Well said. Instead, I should have said that China is honored to have great leadership thus allowing us to deal with corruption better.
As above.
Even Stalin was a great leader and so was Mao. They knew how to control the population to toe their agenda.
The great work of Stalin is well known and so is that of Mao. His excellent work in the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution do require mention.
I made an Interesting observation. Since Islam has such great importance in Pakistan, many pakistanis assume that India also places equal importance in hinduism. But indians have largely figured out the trick to seperate relegion and governance. I assume that is the reason for its economic performance. using this argument one can see how a "godless" china achieved 10% growth.
there's more. The best of the best pakistanis join the army, while indian defence organizations get the leftovers as the good ones opt for lucrative jobs .
Global Politician - Indian Army faces Massive Shortage of Officers
It is true that the Paksitan Army would have the best.
People gravitate to where the power, perks and opportunities lie.
In India, with the economic boom and the MNCs paying huge salaries, the govt cannot pay the same.
Therefore, the people gravitate where there is the gravy train and not dangers to life and limb and a poor lifestyle!
