India/Russia Working on Stealth for SU30MKI

[aimarraul]

And why has your airforce bought, copied, signed for RUSSIAN equipment and is the largest importer of Russian military equipment when you think Russian equipment are not capable.

it's the only way for china ,and we have to upgrate almost everything .the biggest contract between russia and china is 200 SU-27,and it was signed in 1996.trend of russia's future is very clear(逆水行舟，不进则退）

 

[BATMAN]

Yes sir...... the Russians and (us) indeed copied JF-17's very advanced technologies.

Now, our 5th generation fighter will be based on research done for JF-17 and the upgrades to our front line fighter will be copied off JF-17.

Ah..i thought its indians doing the painting job!!!!
To verify if PAKFA is not copying any thing from JF-17 in design...we need pictures of PAKFA! do you have any?
BTW.... i believe even the name 'PAKFA' is copy from Pakistan.

 

[UchihaCG]

it's the only way for china ,and we have to upgrate almost everything .the biggest contract between russia and china is 200 SU-27,and it was signed in 1996.

and doesn't it make sense then We bought Su-30 from china and "upgraded" it too.... just like you guys.

Ah..i thought its indians doing the painting job!!!!
To verify if PAKFA is not copying any thing from JF-17 in design...we need pictures of PAKFA! do you have any?
BTW.... i believe even the name 'PAKFA' is copy from Pakistan.

Yes sir.....

 

[Barrett]

 

[aimarraul]

and doesn't it make sense then We bought Su-30 from china and "upgraded" it too.... just like you guys.




Yes sir.....

way much different between the assembly line and production line ,do you even count the $$$ india invested in SU-30?

 

[RPK]

Ah..i thought its indians doing the painting job!!!!
To verify if PAKFA is not copying any thing from JF-17 in design...we need pictures of PAKFA! do you have any?
BTW.... i believe even the name 'PAKFA' is copy from Pakistan.

I think you dont no anything about PAKFA

PAK FA stands for Perspektinviy Aviatzionniy Kompleks Frontovoy Aviatzii. means "Future Aviation System for Frontal Aviation"

 

[UchihaCG]

way much different between the assembly line and production line ,do you even count the $$$ india invested in SU-30?

And may i have your source on how much India invested on the MKI?

it's the only way for china ,and we have to upgrate almost everything .the biggest contract between russia and china is 200 SU-27,and it was signed in 1996.trend of russia's future is very clear(逆水行舟，不进则退

Why is there a need for China to "upgrade" RUSSIAN equipment when you think Russia sucks, and is unreliable? You like to smack about the MKI's radar. But you fail to realize that where that radar came from is where half your defense equipment coming from, regardless of how much you change it, it's still Russian. China's more advanced so why don't you make your own designs........ i wonder.

I think you dont no anything about PAKFA

PAK FA stands for Perspektinviy Aviatzionniy Kompleks Frontovoy Aviatzii. means "Future Aviation System for Frontal Aviation"

He was replying to me

 

[gubbi]

All fan boy images, the one above most probable. No FSW, above wings air intakes not possible, and no canards from what I have gathered from various forums and people posting there. Credibility - questionable, but then again....

Anyhow, the closest many believe what the PAK-FA would look like would be something like this below..

One guy somewhere said that his friend who works for Sukhoi told him about the taxiing tests and said that a plane with bort no 701 would probably take to the skies in late jan or early feb next year. But hey, thats what "they" say!
on a lighter side,
PAK-FA formula: (YF-23) + (F-22) + (Su-27) = PAK-FA

 

[aimarraul]

Why is there a need for China to "upgrade" RUSSIAN equipment when you think Russia sucks, and is unreliable? You like to smack about the MKI's radar. But you fail to realize that where that radar came from is where half your defense equipment coming from, regardless of how much you change it, it's still Russian. China's more advanced so why don't you make your own designs........ i wonder.

did i ever say china is more advanced? china is still behind russia in lots of area,i am only smacking their cunning and stagnation

 

[UchihaCG]

to the skies in late jan or early feb next year. But hey, thats what "they" say!
on a lighter side,
PAK-FA formula: (YF-23) + (F-22) + (Su-27) = PAK-FA

Hope it comes true =) and your formula is excellent...... no one knows yet..... i am waiting for a surprise.

We have our MCA and MKI's....... hopefully also, the knowledge in the PAK-FA program will be used on these developments.

did i ever say china is more advanced? china is still behind russia in lots of area,i am only smacking their cunning and stagnation

Don't because you are still buying from them.

 

[aimarraul]

Don't because you are still buying from them.

AL-31? what else?china is actully fixing the error of WS in the flying test

 

[gubbi]

Hope it comes true =) and your formula is excellent...... no one knows yet..... i am waiting for a surprise.

We have our MCA and MKI's....... hopefully also, the knowledge in the PAK-FA program will be used on these developments.

Lol, not my formula...got it someplace.

Yup, ToT would definitely help our indigenous defense aviation industry with the ToT from PAK-FA/FGFA project and the MMRCA deal.
Btw, isnt this FGFA is supposed to be the air-superiority fighter while the MCA is to be the 'stealth' or LO strike aircraft, to replace the Jaguars and the MiG-27s. IIRC, work on MCA is already in progress and tech will be incorporated along the way as we receive/develop them.

 

[booo]

BTW.... i believe even the name 'PAKFA' is copy from Pakistan.

LOL... good one may be thats why indians wanted their plane to be named FGFA instead of PAK-FA

 

[Luftwaffe]

Come on first make you LCA operational than we'll talk about stealth su-30 and FGFA..though i still doubt there is going to be no FGFA perhaps yes i can tell semi stealth su-30 is possibility with the help of russians as those american silent eagles..frankly i would make sense and save alot of $$ for india..it simply doesn't make sense to introduce FGFA when indian su-30s costs of maintenance already runs high keep pak-fa/su-30/lca/m2000/upgrade mig29/ by 2020 mirages/21/27/29/jags/harriers all of these have to be replaced it would be better to replace jaguars with su-30 for strike/attack role..
learn from americans fa/18/f-35/f-22 is their future
wonder why India has the need for MRCA when su-30 can perform both roles of air superiority and attack or i as i said before either su-30 did not live up to their promises.

 

[Red Dwarf]

How they going to make Su-30 more stealthy. Is this include a total design change or just superficial changes.