What's new

India rejects Organization of Islamic Cooperation's resolution on Jammu and Kashmir

According to u there is RAW involment.The Baloch armed struggle has been going on right from 1947, RAW was formed or incorporated in the 1960's. More then 5 wars have been fought till now.Don't try to push up things.What about the attacks on Punjabis in Quetta.Is RAW involved.Are Indians coming to quetta & attacking Punjabis.Are Indians coming to Balochistan for kidnapping,killing,torture of Baloch Activist.Are indians protesting on the streets of Quetta,London,Middle East.Only 3% of the Balochis voted in the last elections according to GEO.
U r tying to hide something.We Indians even refused ASYLUM to Brahma Bugti & other Baloch Leaders.Pakistan is clearly playing a double game.When it comes to Kashmir it is freedom struggle.Nawaz Sharief calls the freedom struggle as indigenous but when it comes to Balochistan,it is Indian sponsored terrorism. According to You,there a few people in Makran causing trouble.Why don't u hold a plebiscite or referendum.What about the protest march by Sindhis
View attachment 35948

hundreds of thousand people from Sindh gathered in Karachi on Friday and demanded freedom for Sindh and an independent status for Balochistan.

Don't worry about Baloch. A part from few raw funded and foreign backed separarists vast majority of them are die hard Pakistanis. Waar movie director was Baloch!
 
.
No it does not, they usually hide the ''India'' and replace it Pakistan.

This helps

tipex.jpg
wow .. I wonder how come huriyat leaders never heard of such a revolutionary product.
India denies Kashmiri leaders documents to travel to Saudi Arabia
 
. .
.
70 % of Baloch population are patriotic pashtuns, sindhi speaking baloch/pashtuns, numerous baloch tribes. Only 30 % of balochistan is in trouble due to RAW brainwashed Bugti, Marri and Mengal tribes and few communist minded Makranis in south west of balochistan, all of them make less than 30 % of balochistan's population. First Balochistan is not a disputed territory (no UN resolution there) second even if pakistan holds a plebicite 70 % of Balochstan even today's turmoil will still vote for pakistan.
This is not the case in Kashmir which is disputed territory under UN resolutions where 80 % are muslims and all of them are anti-india on religious as wll as cultural grounds, any plebicite will pave the way to kick out hindu darkies out of kashmir.
Raw is not involved in any form.If u don't solve the problem in accordance with the wishes of Balochis,the armed struggle will go & there will be more Indian allegations
 
. .
Don't worry about Baloch. A part from few raw funded and foreign backed separarists vast majority of them are die hard Pakistanis. Waar movie director was Baloch!
u have armed struggle going on right from 1947 in Balochistan.Only 5 wars have been fought till now.So according to you,a few raw funded separatists are causing trouble right from 1947.Great logic.
 
.
.
. .
u have armed struggle going on right from 1947 in Balochistan.Only 5 wars have been fought till now.So according to you,a few raw funded separatists are causing trouble right from 1947.Great logic.

Sir BLA is small terrorist group without much suppprt, Baloch people have rejected them. Many of them keep giving up arms every month.
 
. .
Sir how can Pakistan change to ugly midget hindu? Thats why only chuhras Pakistanis may claim to be Indian abroad. But i doubt it really, even these people consider themselves superiors to stinky hindus.
maybe they felt humiliated for being tall fair and handsome Pakistani. As far as the who all were those who did that it ain't my problem, you guys should wear your colors proudly on your sleeves instead of being scared.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom