India preparing to test "China Killer" AGNI-V Ballistic Missile.

[Srinivas]

As usual Pakistanis are stepping into the shoes of Chinese and are trolling as if they are more chinese than chinese themselves.

Chinese are feeling the heat in this thread.

India do not hesitate to use force on China if confronted.

 

[padamchen]

Because "China Bashing" sells in India.

Not really true, however much you'd like it to be true to feel scary and important. Truth of the matter is that at the lay populace level there is very little media TRP currency to raise the Chinese bogey. Simply put, the common Indian man does not dislike you nearly enough or care about you or is fearful of you for it to really have an impact and count. There is a very distant admiration for some of the stuff you guys have done and achieved. That's about it. There really are no cultural or racial ties despite our proximity. A proximity that's artificially magnified by your occupation of Tibet that has always been a buffer state between our civilizations and peoples.

Pakistan yes. But then you already know what we think about them.

Coming back to the topic, we don't really need an Agni 5 to hit you to mortally hurt you. Regardless of the noise here, it is not for you. Though you are a convenient alibi.

@Chinese-Dragon

 

[GumNaam]

47: Technically we had none of Kashmir either, only by name.
Whereas you had insurgents, we pushed them back and and now we have 48%. Putting a spin on it is a classic Pakistani move, 100% is what you wanted and we didn't let you.
none the less, we still gained while you still lost. The point still remains valid. You couldn't push most of the freedom fighters and tribal fighters from present azad kashmir even if your life depended on it. Sounds like a victory to me.
65:LOL air superiority that nonsense dialogue again. Lost to ground fire mostly. We had a lower attrition as compared to PAF. what was the use of all that so perceived "air superiority" if you never gained more land than us WHICH WAS PKISTAN's ORIGINAL OBJECTIVE?
Shastri? What?
dude, what the hell is that garbage, doesn't even make any grammatical sense so the state department's telegram can hardly be considered as neutral anyways as they put sanctions on us in spite of being allies. Having said that, that telegram you posted doesn't even make any grammatical sense. Most probably a typical doctored up indian document. And yeah yeah I know, india still claims that it only lost 75 or so aircraft in combat while the rest were destroyed by some ground fire. The point is YOU STILL LOST THEM! And going by your OWN logic that claims that having prevented us from taking all of kashmir is somehow your victory, doesn't that make us preventing you from having breakfast in lahore and lunch in peshawar make US the victors? Typical double indian standards; no wonder no one takes you seriously.

Neutral sources on who won, enjoy:


71: we gained a profound sense of watching the look on your face as you saw what happens when we initiate a war as compared to what happens when you do it(amounts to nothing but crying to daddy US for help).
again, you are wrong. The war was already on between east and west Pakistan. You just took advantage of it. The fact is that you've never really had the guts to start a war, you just scream to start a war with the hopes that uncle sam would intervene on your behalf. kargil is a prime example where you begged for help.

99: Surrounding peaks son, not lower peaks. What use is your higher peak with a 200 degree repeat artillery fire?
Common sense beta common sense use karo.

LOL What? US had to threaten Pakistan? What stories Pakistanis weave to sate their inferiority complex. WAH WAH WAH WAH
Bruce Riedel aide to Clinton during 1999 war, CIA officer and NATO special adviser says,
"Sharif sought US help in extricating Pakistan from a much wider and more dangerous potential conflict, but President Clinton insisted on a Pakistani withdrawal from Kargil. "
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1989886.stm
you do realize the bruce riedel is heavily funded by indian lobbyist so I can hardly take your claim seriously. The bottom line is that three solid months of 3000 or more indian dead bodies and you were still thinking about "escalating"? sharif, being the little putz that he is, sought to save his own skin after he was threatened by clinton over the phone with sanctions. Only when he went there for "breakfast" was when he brought up that he'd withdraw if there are no additional sanctions and if clinton can reign musharraf in. The fact is and remains that had clinton kept his nose out, you were caught in a loose loose situation. Hey, again, the main peak is with us. If you had the guts to escalate, you would've taken it back a long time ago. Just accept it; you couldn't because you CAN'T!
LOL you lot are losing even more soldiers in SIachen, specially when we feel like a little avalanche is necessary, Poke a few hole and wellah, Pak soldiers below are burried without a shot fired.
as per your own indian express, india has lost over 800 soldiers in combat alone, far more to the environment. We haven't lost nearly as much. And avalanches happen in that area, its a natural occurrence. If you think you are causing those avalanches then I guess you must've caused this one as well.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/05/w...d-in-avalanche-on-himalayan-glacier.html?_r=0

67: We are not like you lot Sirji, we don't write fake history in our children's school books, only Pakistan is famous for that.
oh yeah, you only conduct sirjikal strikes on paper and try to sell it to the world as reality like the rest of your pathetic history.

 

[Indian wonk]

Even Agni-5 will be used against Pakistan not against China in depressed trajectory reduce the range and substantially increase the payload from 1.5 tonnes to 3.5 tonnes . Put 7 to 8 MIRVs on it and use it against Pakistan .

 

[GumNaam]

As usual Pakistanis are stepping into the shoes of Chinese and are trolling as if they are more chinese than chinese themselves.

Chinese are feeling the heat in this thread.

India do not hesitate to use force on China if confronted.

is that why you have been continuously loosing territory to China?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...China-Official-report/articleshow/5430564.cms

Even Agni-5 will be used against Pakistan not against China in depressed trajectory reduce the range and substantially increase the payload from 1.5 tonnes to 3.5 tonnes . Put 7 to 8 MIRVs on it and use it against Pakistan .

india hasn't even begun to master miniaturization of warheads while Pakistan is far ahead in the game. So good luck with that, you'll need it!

We they can be happy with their reactions only...Lol

well the reactions don't matter to us because we have motivated the kashmiris enough to take the matters into their own hands. it is india that has been looking for india-favorable reaction from the world which unfortunately for india has not come forth.

 

[Srinivas]

is that why you have been continuously loosing territory to China?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...China-Official-report/articleshow/5430564.cms

Chinese rise do not matter dude. China and India are two giants in the world, China has risen and India is rising.

we are hopeful the issue between India and China gets resolved peacefully.

What ever China is doing now, we are also capable of doing them better. India is in right path.

Agni 5 is only one deterrent of many from India.

 

[GumNaam]

Chinese rise do not matter dude. China and India are two giants in the world, China has risen and India is rising.

we are hopeful the issue between India and China gets resolved peacefully.

What ever China is doing now, we are also capable of doing them better. India is in right path.

Agni 5 is only one deterrent of many from India.

China and india are two natural adversaries. two countries struggling for energy resources; if you think China will india have any of it then your sadly mistaken.

 

[Indian wonk]

india hasn't even begun to master miniaturization of warheads while Pakistan is far ahead in the game. So good luck with that, you'll need it!

Ha ha funny one see the thing is prove it pakistan is far ahead of India .

 

[Srinivas]

China and india are two natural adversaries. two countries struggling for energy resources; if you think China will india have any of it then your sadly mistaken.

The next decades see these two countries shift from oil and natural gas to Nuclear and Electric vehicles.

Chinese population will decline, there is no reason to get panicked for the resources. Both these countries has enough space to flourish.

 

[GumNaam]

Ha ha funny one see the thing is prove it pakistan is far ahead of India .

why would we care to prove it (even though we already have by creating very small tennis ball sized neutron warheads for tactical missiles). But if you don't believe us, it doesn't bother us in the least bit; just try something and you'll find out the hard way. simple as that!

The next decades see these two countries shift from oil and natural gas to Nuclear and Electric vehicles.

Chinese population will decline, there is no reason to get panic for the resources. Both these countries has enough space to flourish.

nuclear is not safe enough yet otherwise power all over the u.s. would've been nuclear. electrical vehicles are still in infancy and the need for energy is growing far rapidly for anyone to wait for nuclear or eletrical. a confrontation over energy corridors is inevitable.

 

[hell9214]

[QUOTEumNaam, post: 9008146, member: 179321"]Nd u dumbest u know the actual range of agni 5 its around 8000km which was jst said by ur Chinese experts after the first test of missile pls read something before quoting...Nd u idiot missile or any weapon is not calculated on its maximum range its depend on effective range b.s. its effective range is 2500 km ...[/QUOTE]
Read it and weep you jackass, it's 2750. The FAS scientists still claim that it's range can easily be increased to 5000+KM if they used more solid fuel. It's only kept at 2750KM to show the world that its only india specific.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaheen-III[/QUOTE]

Lol gain some knowledge any missile don't have definite range nd its range will be increased by upgrading .agni 5 is also able to increase its range frm 8000
Nd I m talking about present one NT future..
Nd pls see the speed deference of both missile nd range of both missile

 

[GumNaam]

[QUOTEumNaam, post: 9008146, member: 179321"]Nd u dumbest u know the actual range of agni 5 its around 8000km which was jst said by ur Chinese experts after the first test of missile pls read something before quoting...Nd u idiot missile or any weapon is not calculated on its maximum range its depend on effective range b.s. its effective range is 2500 km ...

Read it and weep you jackass, it's 2750. The FAS scientists still claim that it's range can easily be increased to 5000+KM if they used more solid fuel. It's only kept at 2750KM to show the world that its only india specific.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaheen-III[/QUOTE]

Lol gain some knowledge any missile don't have definite range nd its range will be increased by upgrading .agni 5 is also able to increase its range frm 8000
Nd I m talking about present one NT future..
Nd pls see the speed deference of both missile nd range of both missile[/QUOTE]
i frankly don't give two craps about the agni missile. 20 minutes to reach China is far too slow by any standards.

 

[Indian wonk]

why would we care to prove it (even though we already have by creating very small tennis ball sized neutron warheads for tactical missiles). But if you don't believe us, it doesn't bother us in the least bit; just try something and you'll find out the hard way. simple as that!

Do you understand the concept of Critical mass man this is the amount of fissile material you need to create a self-sustaining nuclear reaction the amount of fissile material you need to start a nuclear reaction varies by the conditions
under which it is being considered. The mass of material matters, but only if you specify the conditions
under which it is being kept.Under different conditions, the mass of fissile material that will react varies, and varies dramatically. These different conditions include different geometries, densities, temperatures, chemical
compositions/phases, and questions about whether it is embedded into other types of materials.

The sheer ignorance of nuclear physics knowledge continuous to astound me .

 

[Srinivas]

why would we care to prove it (even though we already have by creating very small tennis ball sized neutron warheads for tactical missiles). But if you don't believe us, it doesn't bother us in the least bit; just try something and you'll find out the hard way. simple as that!


nuclear is not safe enough yet otherwise power all over the u.s. would've been nuclear. electrical vehicles are still in infancy and the need for energy is growing far rapidly for anyone to wait for nuclear or eletrical. a confrontation over energy corridors is inevitable.

The next generation will use electric vehicles and Nuclear technology has advanced, reason why more countries are opting for nuclear reactors.

Global warming is the main reason the new technologies are being implemented to find an alternative for fossil fuels.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/mind-the-shock-as-auto-investing-turns-electric-1481626699

Check out the graph in the article, the battery costs are getting reduced as we speak.

CPEC will bring you development and stimulate your economy, but it is not a golden goose. With the investment from China, comes their hegemony.

 

[GumNaam]

The next generation will use electric vehicles and Nuclear technology has advanced, reason why more countries are opting for nuclear reactors.

Global warming is the main reason the new technologies are being implemented to find an alternative for fossil fuels.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/mind-the-shock-as-auto-investing-turns-electric-1481626699

Check out the graph in the article, the battery costs are getting reduced as we speak.

Well your wrong but I hope your right for the same of the environment. Although I just don't see it happening because the oil and gas cartels are far too strong. Until they are made a dent in in the western world, nuclear and electrical energy will continue to be a far second. But like I said, I hope you're right for the sake of the environment.