India preparing to test "China Killer" AGNI-V Ballistic Missile.

[el che]

Oh man, this fight I wanna see...1962 REBORN!

Hey Smartass, 10,000 brave Indians fought against 80,000 Chinese who back stabbed when stupid Nehru was singing songs of peace Hindi Chini bhai bhai.
Inspite of being outnumbered heavily 700 Chinese soldiers were killed and 1300 Indian soldiers were killed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Indian_War

While 98000!!!!!!! Pakistani troops surrendered. Then in 1984 you lost Siachen. Then in 1999 Kargil you thought sneaking on some vacant mountains will give you Kashmir. And even after the misadventure your govt. claimed them to be Mujahideens. Then your PM admitted to 4000 casualties.

On a serious note, stop being a cheerleader and stop being a troll and discuss the missile if you are knowledgeable enough.

 

[ashok321]

Though China has Megaton capacity vs India's 200 KT, but, the MIRV released 200 KT missiles cause more target damage with their dispersed attack than one megaton Chinese unitary warhead. Thats why MIRVs are deadly force today irrespective of MT capacity.

Single warhead missiles are launched for each target separately, not the case with MIRV wherein the MIRV bus dispenses multiple warheads across the broad area.

MIRVs are interceptor proof, because the interceptor carries a single warhead for one detonation, while the the MIRV bus releases several missiles within the span of few minutes for scattered attack which causes more carpet area damage than the single warhead.

So in a way, the MIRV maximizes the damage that a single missile could cause.
MIRVing increases kill probability.

So to say that, with MIRV, India has nullified the prior Chinese MT capacity advantage.

 

[el che]

Though China has Megaton capacity vs India's 200 KT, but, the MIRV released 200 KT missiles cause more target damage with their dispersed attack than one megaton Chinese unitary warhead. Thats why MIRVs are deadly force today irrespective of MT capacity.

Single warhead missiles are launched for each target separately, not the case with MIRV wherein the MIRV bus dispenses multiple warheads across the broad area.

MIRVs are interceptor proof, because the interceptor carries a single warhead for one detonation, while the the MIRV bus releases several missiles within the span of few minutes for scattered attack which causes more carpet area damage than the single warhead.

So in a way, the MIRV maximizes the damage that a single missile could cause.
MIRVing increases kill probability.

View attachment 360185

So to say that, with MIRV, India has nullified the prior Chinese MT capacity advantage.

Is Agni 5 MIRV missile?

 

[Akasa]

Though China has Megaton capacity vs India's 200 KT, but, the MIRV released 200 KT missiles cause more target damage with their dispersed attack than one megaton Chinese unitary warhead. Thats why MIRVs are deadly force today irrespective of MT capacity.

Single warhead missiles are launched for each target separately, not the case with MIRV wherein the MIRV bus dispenses multiple warheads across the broad area.

MIRVs are interceptor proof, because the interceptor carries a single warhead for one detonation, while the the MIRV bus releases several missiles within the span of few minutes for scattered attack which causes more carpet area damage than the single warhead.

So in a way, the MIRV maximizes the damage that a single missile could cause.
MIRVing increases kill probability.

View attachment 360185

So to say that, with MIRV, India has nullified the prior Chinese MT capacity advantage.

The Chinese have been fielding MIRV-ed missiles as well. What separates the men from the boys is the miniaturization of the warheads (i.e. reducing size while retaining a credible yield).

 

[ashok321]

Is Agni 5 MIRV missile?

Not yet.
2 more years.

 

[AUz]

Not yet.
2 more years.

Who told you india has 200kt warheads? lol

 

[IblinI]

Hey Smartass, 10,000 brave Indians fought against 80,000 Chinese who back stabbed when stupid Nehru was singing songs of peace Hindi Chini bhai bhai.
Inspite of being outnumbered heavily 700 Chinese soldiers were killed and 1300 Indian soldiers were killed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Indian_War

While 98000!!!!!!! Pakistani troops surrendered. Then in 1984 you lost Siachen. Then in 1999 Kargil you thought sneaking on some vacant mountains will give you Kashmir. And even after the misadventure your govt. claimed them to be Mujahideens. Then your PM admitted to 4000 casualties.

On a serious note, stop being a cheerleader and stop being a troll and discuss the missile if you are knowledgeable enough.

"Bravely" and 80,000 soldiers in tibet during 1962's China,what can i say.

 

[ashok321]

Who told you india has 200kt warheads? lol

Its 200 KT yield.

And since you have -43, no more frivolous posts.

 

[AUz]

Its 200 KT yield.

And since you have -43, no more frivolous posts.

Source? lol

Dont be a typical indian gullible clueless fanboy and utter things willy nilly.

Where is your source of india possessing 200kt warheads?

 

[Mo12]

Lisa Curtis, senior research fellow for South Asia, and Baker Spring, research fellow in National Security Policy, at The Heritage Foundation, a conservative thinktank said in a commentary, “The lack of US condemnation of India's latest missile test demonstrates that the US is comfortable with Indian progress in the nuclear and missile fields and appreciates India's need to meet the emerging strategic challenge posed by rising China.”
- Wikipedia

Hypocrites.

No terrorists will take our nuclear bombs and we have never attacked a country first.

 

[GumNaam]

Hey Smartass, 10,000 brave Indians fought against 80,000 Chinese who back stabbed when stupid Nehru was singing songs of peace Hindi Chini bhai bhai.
Inspite of being outnumbered heavily 700 Chinese soldiers were killed and 1300 Indian soldiers were killed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Indian_War

While 98000!!!!!!! Pakistani troops surrendered. Then in 1984 you lost Siachen. Then in 1999 Kargil you thought sneaking on some vacant mountains will give you Kashmir. And even after the misadventure your govt. claimed them to be Mujahideens. Then your PM admitted to 4000 casualties.

On a serious note, stop being a cheerleader and stop being a troll and discuss the missile if you are knowledgeable enough.

listen you dingbat, first off, I could care less about your twisted bollywood history that 10000 "brave" soldiers fought against 80000 Chinese soldiers or however many soldiers; bottom line that you cannot deny is that your so called brave soldiers turned tail and ran like hell to save their own skins. And here's a crash course for you on 1971!

98000 who surrendered were actually mostly civilians and nonbengali west Pakistanis who were working on gov't positions and having private businesses. Pakistan's entire army in 1971 was 350000, more than half of whom were bengalis in east Pakistan who had rebelled. Leaving roughly 150000 troops to defend the west and east, 25000 of whom where actually sent to e. Pakistan to put down the civil war. Thousands of them were killed in east Pakistan fighting both the mukti bahini who themselves were mostly former Pakistan Army soldiers who had rebelled agains the state and the indian army that was standing behind the mukti bahini. So this 98000 were MOSTLY civilians, not soldiers as your media would like for you to believe. For us Pakistanis, especially the urdu speaking ones ME from karachi, this is common knowledge for us as many of us had family members lived in east Pakistan and were eventually taken as prisoners of war even though they had NOTHING to with the military. And yes, that includes my OWN relatives who had businesses in east Pakistan. So don't even bother trying sell me that load of rotten horse manure that you eat for breakfast that most of them were army soldiers because they were NOT! Most were civilians from west who got caught in the cross fire and were eventually taken prisoner by the indian army ONLY because they were loyal to Pakistan. So don't try to sell me that horse crap that 80000 were soldiers while 20000 were civilians because after the most of the bengali troops deserted in march of 1971, Pakistan just did not have those kinds of numbers left in the army to send over east Pakistan; the reality is the opposite and it also adds up; the maximum number of troops we could send over to east Pakistan dismal at best and dhaka was bound to fall with nothing to top it. To think that east Pakistan only had 10000 civilians from west Pakistan is ludicrous at best. But hats off to your crooked media twisting and pr; it managed to convince the world of the exact opposite. Having said all that, I for one don't support Pakistan in the 1971 war and am one of those ones who rightly say that Pakistan brought it upon itself by discriminating against the majority of the population that consisted of bengalis.

As for siachin, you have gathered far more losses than we ever had in that theatre with no end in side while, thanks to Kargil, we now, as we speak, occupy the highest peak in the area that over looks the only road that can be used to supply your troops in siachin; they are virtually sitting at our mercy. What you call as being sneaky, I call brilliant since you had basically exempted your entire fighting force in trying to retake numerous smaller peaks and finally gave up and cried uncle clinton when it became obvious that tiger hill cannot be taken back. And in spite of our crap prime minister folding in front of clinton's pressure, we still managed to keep that main peak. If your army had even one tenth of the bravery that you claim it does, you would have started an all out war to get that peak back. That peak is with us to this day routinely blocks your supplies going to siachin which causes even more indian troops die of extreme cold and starvation.

just try and take it back if you dare.

As for your missile test; yeah nothing new, it is the same missile that was tested earlier this year. this normal, they may have fixed a few problems and retested it. it is nothing even close to the entire b.s. hype that the indian media is making it to be. But none the less, it is China centric and will indo-China confrontation all the more interesting in the very near future.

 

[ashok321]

 

[GumNaam]

View attachment 360188

I think he meant a reliable news source, not the indian tabloids.

 

[Mo12]

"Bravely" and 80,000 soldiers in tibet during 1962's China,what can i say.

You shouldnt laugh at this, especially what after Japan did to China.

 

[ashok321]

I think he meant a reliable news source, not the indian tabloids.

It is the premier Indian scientist (who claims) who was responsible for India's nuclear explosion and is responsible for assembling Indian nuclear bombs at BARC and not the tabloid that matters.