What's new

India planned strike on Muridke after Mumbai attacks, Kasuri reveals

Optimos Prime IA

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 5, 2015
Messages
1,046
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
India planned strike on Muridke after Mumbai attacks, Kasuri reveals

Muhammad Saleh Zaafir
Saturday, August 29, 2015
From Print Edition

Islamabad
It has been revealed now that India had planned to carry out an air attack on Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) headquarters in Muridke near Lahore immediately after the 2008 Mumbai attacks and Indians had also taken the United States into confidence for its plan.



A delegation led by US presidential candidate Senator John McCain, including Senator Lindsey Graham, a senior and influential Republican Senator, then a Member of the Select Committee on Intelligence and Richard Holbrooke, US Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, visited Lahore.



They met Pakistan's former foreign minister Mian Khurshid Mahmood Kasuri at a quiet lunch and sought his opinion as a politician and someone who had headed the Foreign Office for five years on what would be the likely reaction of the Pakistan Army and the people at large if there was a limited Indian air-raid on Muridke, LeT headquarters, and its political wing, Jamaat-ud-Dawaah (JUD).



Khurshid Kasuri was stunned by the suggestion. They were coming from India where they said there was a feeling of complete outrage and they feared that things could escalate dramatically unless something was done to release the pressure.



The Indians strongly believed that the JUD on orders of Lashkar-e-Taiba's leader Hafiz Muhammad Saeed was responsible for the Mumbai assaults. Khurshid Kasuri had no doubt that such a suggestion could not have come without their sounding out people at the highest level in India before their visit to Pakistan and that the Indians might have been mulling such an action.



The delegation members also believed that unless some dramatic action was taken, all the good work that had been done on Pakistan-India peace process during the time when Kasuri was the Foreign Minister would be wasted. Horrified at the mere suggestion, the former foreign minister warned the delegation of public outrage if that happened.



Certain beyond doubt that the response of the Pakistan Army would be immediate, though measured, and commensurate to the raid at Muridke, he gave the example of how the public pressure had forced Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to go ahead with nuclear tests after India carried out the tests in 1998. He further told them that they needed to be sensitive to the history of South Asia, and in many instances it is the gut reaction which determines how people act in a given situation.



The details of the meeting and its backdrop are highlighted in the book 'Neither A Hawk Nor A Dove' authored by Mian Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri. The book is being published worldwide by Oxford University Press and by Penguin in India and carries important information available exclusively with the author.



The author recalls 26 November as a sad day when the tragic attack on Mumbai took place, delivering a heavy blow to the peace process between Pakistan and India, which the two countries had so diligently pursued. Khurshid Kasuri successor, Shah Mahmood Qureshi, foreign minister in the new PPP government, was present in India in connection with the Composite Dialogue when the attacks took place, in what seemed like a calculated attempt to sabotage the visit and the process itself.



Kasuri writes he was reminded of a similar situation on the eve of his own visit to India when the Samjhauta Express blast occurred in which there were many casualties, most of whom were Pakistanis visiting their relatives in India. The accused in that instance ultimately turned out to be Hindu extremists in India. The author shares it in the book that he was advised to cancel his visit after the Samjhauta Express blasts but he refused, since that would encourage terrorists by raising their morale and into believing that they had succeeded in sabotaging his visit. As a result of the four-day siege in Mumbai, at least 160 people died and 293 were injured, many of them severely.



There was outrage in India. There was immediate and strong condemnation of the attacks by the leadership in Pakistan. Khurshid Kasruri narrates that they instantly understood that the perpetrators wished to wreck the peace process as, "many incidents in Kashmir, India, and Pakistan had taken place before important diplomatic visits to the subcontinent, either by important foreign visitors, including the 'Chattisinghpura Massacre' which took place on the eve of President Bill Clinton's visit to India, and other incidents during the visits of Pakistani leaders to India or by Indian leaders to Pakistan. The author gives credit to both Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and the then Opposition leader LK Advani, who he states displayed restraint, despite the pressure they were under, and did not directly implicate the Government of Pakistan.



"This was obviously due to the great progress that had been made in the peace process during our tenure which ended in November 2007. In a televised address, he adds, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said India would "go after" individuals and organisations behind the terrorist attacks, which were "well-planned with external linkages…."



Regarding the luncheon meeting with the US delegation, the author writes that his experience told him that this was as high-powered a delegation as it could be. He was informed that it would be a small and quiet lunch and he was asked to come before lunch so that they could talk alone. He instinctively understood that there must be something important that they wished to discuss with him.



"To my consternation, Senator McCain wanted to know from me, in view of my experience, both as former Foreign Minister and as a politician, what the reaction of the Pakistan Army and the public at large would be, if there was a limited air-raid on Muridke," he writes.



The author writes that he was horrified at the mere suggestion and told them that this would result in public outrage. He was certain beyond doubt that the response of the Pakistan Army would be immediate, though measured, and commensurate to the raid at Muridke. The author says he gave them the example of India's nuclear tests in May 1998 and told them that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was under great pressure from the international community, particularly the Americans, not to respond to India's nuclear tests. In fact, Nawaz Sharif was given many incentives, including by President Clinton, to desist from going through with the nuclear tests.



The author states that he informed them that the common wisdom on the street was 'ya Nawaz bum pharayga—ya bum usko pharayga'! (Either Nawaz will detonate the bomb—if he doesn't, he will be detonated by the bomb!). "I did, however, tell the Senators that since I was out of office, they needed to discuss this matter with somebody currently in power in Islamabad and even better, sound out the Pakistan Army, either directly or through their contacts. I do not know whether they broached the subject or not with anyone in Islamabad," the author narrates.



He goes on to share that "I have not spoken about this publicly before, because I felt it could have been misinterpreted and have had a negative impact on Pak-US relations" because he felt that for properly understanding the situation, it was necessary to give the entire context since the US may well have feared an outbreak of hostilities between the two countries and may have thought, though naively in the authors view, that an Indian attack on Muridke would help prevent such an eventuality.



He says, "I am mentioning it now to underline how quickly things can go horribly wrong and out of control for both the governments if the activities of non-state actors are not strictly curbed." The author writes that he did realize that Senator McCain and Senator Lindsey Graham were Republicans and did not represent the elected Democratic Obama Administration. They could very well have been speaking for themselves because it was Senator McCain who broached the subject while Richard Holbrooke, who did represent the Obama Administration as Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, kept quiet for the duration that this idea was being discussed but this could also be for the purpose of providing him with 'plausible deniability' which diplomats often employ. He could always say that he had nothing to do with this idea and that he was merely accompanying senior Congressional leaders, the author adds. Immediately after this subject had been discussed Holbrooke broached an entirely new subject (referred to in the book) during which, interestingly, the two senators kept completely mum.



After the lunch was over, the author says he thought it necessary to immediately ring General Hamid Javed, Chief of Staff to the President, who had been his liaison with the army while he was Foreign Minister, knowing that he would pass on this information not just to General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, the then Chief of Army Staff, but to other relevant people also. The author told him about what he was asked. "If my memory serves me well, I also rang General Kayani directly," he states.



Kasuri expresses his feelings in the book as he writes that he was genuinely afraid that once an attack, however limited, took place, and once a response, however measured, was given, nobody could predict how the situation would evolve. There was no guarantee that a tit-for-tat response would soothe feelings on either side. Once the media and politicians got into the act, he writes, the situation could easily spiral out of control.



Elsewhere in the book, the author has also discussed the 'Cold Start' doctrine advocated by some in India as a way to neutralize nuclear parity in South Asia, and the thinking among some strategists in Pakistan to develop battlefield tactical nuclear weapons in response.



Kasuri writes that although, bomb blasts have unfortunately continued in Pakistan and India, nothing as catastrophic as the Mumbai blasts have taken place. He points out in another place in the book that non-state actors have caused huge damage to Pakistan itself and that such groups cannot be controlled and have transnational linkages, as is evident from the happenings in the Middle East. Luckily, he adds, the Pakistan Army, under General Raheel Sharif, has taken massive action in North Waziristan where terrorists have been chased out of their safe havens and their infrastructure destroyed.



The book has been in the market for a few days now. It is an impressive and voluminous account of his dealings with world leaders and Pakistan's relations with India, the United States, China, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, the GCC countries, Turkey, Iran, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Bangladesh. Many stories of contemporary interest are present in the book.



India planned strike on Muridke after Mumbai attacks, Kasuri reveals - thenews.com.pk
 
.
Spineless congress government wasted precious time by going to US . Why did US was considered to become a third party that too to get permission from pakistan to attack Pakistan ? Insane in its different level. If india attacked the launching pads by then US would have stepped in and stopped pakistan from escalation . Or we mighy have faught war which is long pending .

Hope these things won't happen this time around as I like to bring up one sentence from Modi's interview before he a day for election on zee news channel . " If Pakistan attacked you , you go to Obama (he mocked Obama Obama help help) ? Should have gone to Pakistan"

Sure india wont estate to enter Pakistan if some like 26/11 happens . It will be do or die for both . Only best can survive . No help will be lended other than words rhetorics and weapon supply. As world is not fools to get destroyed along with Indo pa k war
 
.
Spineless congress government wasted precious time by going to US . Why did US was considered to become a third party that too to get permission from pakistan to attack Pakistan ? Insane in its different level.
:lol:
1st you need guts to attack Pakistan, wich you didn't have as well as moral ground.
2nd you run to USA, because you knew we will kick your a$$ so hard you won't be able to sh!t
 
.
Spineless congress government wasted precious time by going to US . Why did US was considered to become a third party that too to get permission from pakistan to attack Pakistan ? Insane in its different level. If india attacked the launching pads by then US would have stepped in and stopped pakistan from escalation . Or we mighy have faught war which is long pending .

Hope these things won't happen this time around as I like to bring up one sentence from Modi's interview before he a day for election on zee news channel . " If Pakistan attacked you , you go to Obama (he mocked Obama Obama help help) ? Should have gone to Pakistan"

Sure india wont estate to enter Pakistan if some like 26/11 happens . It will be do or die for both . Only best can survive . No help will be lended other than words rhetorics and weapon supply. As world is not fools to get destroyed along with Indo pa k war

You ran to USA as a backup. Because if Pakistan responded back then you would go crying to your daddy USA.

That's the reason you briefed USA about it. Does Israel ever brief USA about a attack on Hezbollah? They do it regardless as they have a independent foreign policy.

India is spineless, simple as that.
 
. .
:lol:
1st you need guts to attack Pakistan, wich you didn't have as well as moral ground.
2nd you run to USA, because you knew we will kick your a$$ so hard you won't be able to sh!t

The last thing the americans would do is to stop the Indians from attacking Pakistan. In fact they'd egg them on. The Indians would not have been penalised or prevented by the west from doing so. At the end of the day the americans could not care less. The only nations the Americans care about are themselves and Western Europe. The fact that the Indians did not attack says something about their military top brass and top political officials. A day before Pakistan conducted it's nuclear tests in May 1998 many leading indian politicians, scientists and so-called experts (much like on defence.pk) claimed that Pakistan has 0% nuclear weapons capability and could not conduct a test. They argued till they we're blue in the face to prove this. They got the biggest surprise of their lives a day latter. Apparently there was a big commotion in the indian parliament that day about us conducting those tests. My educated guess is that the reality (even in 2008) is that the top indian military and political figures are fully aware that at least publically that they have perhaps seriously underestimated Pakistan's military capabilities and just like 1998 they may get a massive surprise. Once a war between Pakistan and india starts, the Indians cannot control the final outcome or how far it would escalate. One thing that did not stop the Indians from attacking in 2008 as they claim is their restraint. That was the last thing. I truly believe that had Pakistan not had nuclear weapons we would have been invaded or at least attacked.
 
.
India and China have "No First Use" policies.

However, Pakistan has a "First Use" policy.

So if India tries that, they are going to come off much worse, due to Pakistan's significantly larger nuclear arsenal.
A nuclear response to conventional airstrike on bordering city of no strategic value? :woot:

Are you trying to insult Pakistani conventional military capabilities or insult their nuclear doctrine? :lol:
 
.
Could've, Should've, Would've....

I call BS...If they wanted/had the capability to strike they should have then..
No use talking about it now...enough with this "what if" scenario we Indians keep clinging to...Take action or Shut up!
 
.
A nuclear response to conventional airstrike on bordering city of no strategic value? :woot:

Are you trying to insult Pakistani conventional military capabilities or insult their nuclear doctrine? :lol:

If you think they wouldn't have responded, leading to an "escalation" (with platforms like Nasr expediting things), then why didn't you do it? :lol:
 
. .
Lol hit the bullseye

They know just as well as you or I do, they just pretend they don't. :azn:

Or maybe they truly believe they can make such a strike on Pakistan, and there will be zero response. The same thing they believed when they attacked us in 1962, while we were in the middle of the worst famine of our history.

Maybe they assume since they can't respond, no one else can either.
 
.
Could've, Should've, Would've....

I call BS...If they wanted/had the capability to strike they should have then..
No use talking about it now...enough with this "what if" scenario we Indians keep clinging to...Take action or Shut up!

If they did have the capability then they would have. Probably with the blessing of the americans.
 
.
Americans were here to seek assurance that pakistan will not strike back....
 
.
If you think they wouldn't have responded, leading to an "escalation" (with platforms like Nasr expediting things), then why didn't you do it? :lol:
India can only respond militarily in the event Pakistan Govt admitted carrying out the 26/11 attack, as it would mean an act of war

Like Indian response to the below

Operation Chengiz Khan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Are you stating Pakistani Govt was behind the 26/11 attack? an attack that resulted in injuring a Chinese citizen?

Besides why would any Govt use Nasr (Surface to Surface missile) against a conventional airstrike? :woot:

RIP Military logic :angel:

You know just as well as anyone else, how easily things could escalate.

Or maybe you don't know, and you didn't do it because...?

No! I do not know just as everyone else, how a nuclear response is logical to a conventional airstrike on nonstrategic targets :lol:

Could've, Should've, Would've....

I call BS...If they wanted/had the capability to strike they should have then..
No use talking about it now...enough with this "what if" scenario we Indians keep clinging to...Take action or Shut up!
There no other news sources mentioning this, better wait for it to be confirmed as credible
 
.
India can only respond militarily in the event Pakistan Govt admitted carrying out the 26/11 attack, as it would mean an act of war

Like Indian response to the below

Operation Chengiz Khan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Are you stating Pakistani Govt was behind the 26/11 attack?

Besides why would any Govt use Nasr (Surface to Surface missile) against a conventional airstrike? :woot:

RIP Military logic :angel:



No! I do not know just as everyone else, how a nuclear response is logical to a conventional airstrike on nonstrategic targets :lol:


There no other news sources mentioning this, better wait for it to be confirmed as credible

What a joke man. :rofl:

You didn't respond, because you COULDN'T.

Just like you couldn't respond to all those "Chinese incursions" into Indian soil (even one when Xi Jinping was visiting Modi).

Here is your response to a "Chinese incursion" that lasted over 3 weeks:

Indian troops suspend patrols at Chumar - The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Apart from dismantling a SET of strategically-located bunkers at Chumar as part of an arrangement to end the standoff at Depsang Bulge in eastern Ladakh, the Indian troops seem to have suspended patrols to the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Chumar, at least for now. Senior officials briefed by personnel on the ground said the Army has discontinued the round-the-clock patrolling it was undertaking in the area for the last few months.


Destroyed your own bunkers, stopped troop patrols to your own territory. :lol:

Since you can't do anything, you project that onto others, and assume they can't do anything either. As you found to your detriment when you attacked us in 1962, during our worst ever famine.

And on the day you assume Pakistan won't respond, that will be the end of you. It will start an inevitable chain of escalation, and you know the conclusion to that.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom