ironman
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,438
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Yes, you provide an "example" of being closer to nuclear war than any other region on Earth.
Where is Dawood?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, you provide an "example" of being closer to nuclear war than any other region on Earth.
Where is Dawood?
Cooperation is very important. Friendship on the other hand, is both unlikely and unnecessary.
Look at China and Japan, we have the largest bilateral trading relationship in Asia. And the chances of a violent conflict between us is almost zero.
We are not friends with each other, but we cooperate in almost every field. And both sides gain from it.
^^^ LOL, a troll "fatwa".
Try answering questions instead.
What other border on Earth, has more risk of a nuclear war, than the India-Pakistan border?
That is hardly "setting an example". And if you want to talk about cooperation, where is Dawood?
Let me remind you that we have enough for ourselves .. excuse us from any world power and world power wannabes..
^^^ LOL, a troll "fatwa".
Try answering questions instead.
What other border on Earth, has more risk of a nuclear war, than the India-Pakistan border?
India and Pakistan: The World's most dangerous border - The Economist
That is hardly "setting an example". And if you want to talk about cooperation, where is Dawood?
So even you where is Dawood ! . I think China should play a greater role. Pakistan may be more than forthcoming to Chinese pressure. No amount international pressure will make Pakistan budge. But a gentle nudge by China may work.
That's why I said cooperation should be first, and friendship later (if at all). That's the most realistic solution.
But the Indian members weren't happy with that suggestion.
Even though we ALL know, that India-Pakistan friendship is a very unlikely scenario in the near future.
We are all for friendship.. but not like China Japan..
That's why I said cooperation should be first, and friendship later (if at all). That's the most realistic solution.
But the Indian members weren't happy with that suggestion.
Even though we ALL know, that India-Pakistan friendship is a very unlikely scenario in the near future.
We are all for friendship.. but not like China Japan..
Yeah, Knowing what Japan did in China who would like to be compared with them...
LOL, and we've seen how far that has gotten you.
Cross border terrorism, and the highest risk of nuclear warfare out of any national border.
When was the last time militants from China-Japan, crossed each others borders to shoot up hotels? There is no chance of a nuclear war either, since only one side has nukes.
No matter what anyone says or does, reality is that India and Pakistan will have to learn to live with each other. Improved relations is essential for peace in South Asia, friendship comes later. However it's so evident that it isn't in China's interest to have a better Indo-Pak relation. Someone posted a thread of how China is using Pakistan as a "pawn" to stall India's growth.