SIPRA
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2019
- Messages
- 13,549
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Oye Zalima.. ki kar ditta ee. uon tay te gal shuroo karani se... lakin hasa a gaya ae...
Lakin... tussee pajee nay tay aundee chok de vich tor ditee ae!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oye Zalima.. ki kar ditta ee. uon tay te gal shuroo karani se... lakin hasa a gaya ae...
Lakin... tussee pajee nay tay aundee chok de vich tor ditee ae!
Oye Zalima.. ki kar ditta ee. uon tay te gal shuroo karani se... lakin hasa a gaya ae...
Maji de vich dang.... da kum shuroo karana si assee...
Oye ja, ja way ja... Choothay a... Piar di lagan... wali philosophy karani si assi...
Lakin... tussee pajee nay tay aundee chok de vich tor ditee ae!
I Love NoorJahan!
Ineed, a Disruptor is needed for Innovation.
However, please, study the dynamics of Crusades as well...and how excess male population was sent off because there were fewer females and economic hardships...so Crusade was Adventure+.
Things are not straightforward... building complexity layer by layer in a Thesis gives it depth ...flesh on bones so to speak...
Momentum of History started Acceleartion round about a 1000years ago..and with addition of techonology the Lifespan of an Event and its ensuing Results got shorter.. The Process is still continuing...
Frankly, I am not much versed in your country... Pakistan, China and CentralAsia has been more of my area of Study... hence, I take your posts as eductional opportunity... and question things to advance my understanding without PakBias.
Reality is plastic. Number is Absolute.
Mangus
The Idea of Strategic Depth was/is of Socio-Politico-Economic alignment/conduct and was/is NOT of military in nature.
Simply because all our WeaponSystems and Doctorine is based on AgressiveDefence from within The Heartland Pakistan...
Your media and our own MarasiMedia went overboard with guidance from your deepstate to ridicule this..implying that GanguTerroristArmy will somehow march into Pakistan and PakArmedForces will retreat to Kabulistan...
It was a PsyOp to undermine the very potent idea of StrategicDepth..which is still valid and shall to fore in due time.
View attachment 598737
In 1764 India was ripe for the picking.
The Mughal Empire, which had ruled much of the region for the past two centuries, had shattered. The various smaller states that arose in its place were relatively weak, both militarily and economically. Recent advances in artillery and infantry techniques had given Europeans a significant edge on the battlefield, as had been demonstrated only a few years earlier when the French dealt a number of crushing defeats to the Nawab of Carnatic.
The British East India Company observed all this with a curious eye, and after evicting the French from the region, had a mind to take a more active role in the subcontinent (having previously been largely restricted to trade concessions).
The spark for outright conquest came from India, when the Jagat Seth bankers of Bengal, being fed up with the cruelty of the Nawab, invited (and financed) the British invasion. Their reasoning, not unfounded, being that the British were the least-worst option for providing a stable, business-friendly environment.
In response to British incursion came a triple alliance, described as the, “last gasp” of the Mughals, which included the Nawab of Bengal, Nawab of Awadh, and Mughal remnants under Shah Alam. The conflict that followed was a close-run affair, but the British ultimately emerged victorious and annexed the Bengal region (then the richest province in India).
Over the next 100 years the British East India Company would conquer the remaining states across India, often doing so by exploiting rivalries between adversarial Indian rulers. While local polities quickly closed the military gap and acquitted themselves well on the battlefield (the Mysore Sultans and Sikh Empire earning particular praise from the British), the economic gap only widened, and ultimately, guaranteed the Company’s success.
British rule would last until 1947, only being seriously threatened in the 1857 rebellion, during which North-Indians attempted to oust the British and reinstall the Mughals under, “Emperor” Bahdur Shah Zafur (who was only a ceremonial figurehead at this point).
Link to full post w/ additional reading/sources.
next time please use primary/better sources---though this is a fantastic effort (around 80% correct I would say--->so sincerely thank you)
A Historical Atlas of South Asia
Arunacharl had independent tribes in 1764..It was not under any Qing suzerainity
Arunachal Pradesh between 1707 and 1766
What a pleasantly surprising series of posts. Except for minor quibbles (running the length and breadth of the posts, but pine splinters, not even toothpicks, in consequence), such as an eyebrow raised to '...a map by Herodotus I believe...', the bulk of this is cogent exposition.
New Recruit
Thank you for the resources!next time please use primary/better sources---though this is a fantastic effort (around 80% correct I would say--->so sincerely thank you)
A Historical Atlas of South Asia
Arunachal Pradesh had independent tribes in 1764..It was not under any Qing suzerainity
Arunachal Pradesh between 1707 and 1766
Thats is quite rue, If you mean india after 1947 Yes, we dont. And if you mean India before 1947. There was no such thing entity called as India, after British came they gave it as such name. Sub continent would be the right termIndia's history.
Thats is quite rue, If you mean india after 1047 Yes, we dont. And if you mean India before 1947. There was no such thing entity called as India, after British came they gave it as such name. Sub continent would be the right term
And we have seen so-called experimental states that have been torn apart by so-called socialismgoverned by Socialism.
And we have seen so-called experimental states that have been torn apart by so-called socialism
Love a bit of history.. thanks for the postView attachment 598737
In 1764 India was ripe for the picking.
The Mughal Empire, which had ruled much of the region for the past two centuries, had shattered. The various smaller states that arose in its place were relatively weak, both militarily and economically. Recent advances in artillery and infantry techniques had given Europeans a significant edge on the battlefield, as had been demonstrated only a few years earlier when the French dealt a number of crushing defeats to the Nawab of Carnatic.
The British East India Company observed all this with a curious eye, and after evicting the French from the region, had a mind to take a more active role in the subcontinent (having previously been largely restricted to trade concessions).
The spark for outright conquest came from India, when the Jagat Seth bankers of Bengal, being fed up with the cruelty of the Nawab, invited (and financed) the British invasion. Their reasoning, not unfounded, being that the British were the least-worst option for providing a stable, business-friendly environment.
In response to British incursion came a triple alliance, described as the, “last gasp” of the Mughals, which included the Nawab of Bengal, Nawab of Awadh, and Mughal remnants under Shah Alam. The conflict that followed was a close-run affair, but the British ultimately emerged victorious and annexed the Bengal region (then the richest province in India).
Over the next 100 years the British East India Company would conquer the remaining states across India, often doing so by exploiting rivalries between adversarial Indian rulers. While local polities quickly closed the military gap and acquitted themselves well on the battlefield (the Mysore Sultans and Sikh Empire earning particular praise from the British), the economic gap only widened, and ultimately, guaranteed the Company’s success.
British rule would last until 1947, only being seriously threatened in the 1857 rebellion, during which North-Indians attempted to oust the British and reinstall the Mughals under, “Emperor” Bahdur Shah Zafur (who was only a ceremonial figurehead at this point).
Link to full post w/ additional reading/sources.
Which is why they have failed to exist as a coherent societyExperimental states. And such experiments are far better than some non-Socialist societies like India and Pakistan which are fearful of experiment and continue to have Regressive political / economic / social systems.
The most widely and overrated term, every country faces an external presuure and their leadership take remedial actions accordingly, so blaming external forces is like saying you dont expect to Lion to eat you bcoz you didnt eat him.. Its high time that you get out of your delusionsExternal plots came into picture in them
Every system applied to every other country is experiment, and experiment fail and succeed, in the latter case it has failed miserablyExperimental states. And such experiments are far better
Which is why they have failed to exist as a coherent society
The most widely and overrated term, every country faces an external presuure and their leadership take remedial actions accordingly, so blaming external forces is like saying you dont expect to Lion to eat you bcoz you didnt eat him.. Its high time that you get out of your delusions
Every system applied to every other country is experiment, and experiment fail and succeed, in the latter case it has failed miserably
You have already mentioned that in list of failed states that followed Socialism shitGive me examples.
LOL, It was started from within, It was Libyan who revolted and rest of foreigner took the advantage of fault lines. DOnt be so gullibleIn case of Libya in 2011, it was attacked by 29 NATO countries + 6 GCC countries + the thousands of terrorists they supported.
Because there is no such need. Your arguments have become irrelevant as your Socialist state.No, most countries simply don't bother to experiment. I will again mention India and Pakistan. These simply adopted the systems of USA and Britain wholesale.