India Must Make Peace With Pakistan to Stop Terrorism

[rastor]

self-delete

 

[ajpirzada]

That's not entirely correct. Even though Col.Purohit was investigated as a suspect in these blasts, he was never charged with any involvement. The CBI which investigated the blasts found no evidence of his involvement. You would be very interested in knowing that a Pakistani national Asif Kasmani was named by the U.S. as being involved in the blasts and sanctions were sought from the U.N. on that basis.

US names Pak man for blasts on Samjhauta

NEW DELHI: In what should scotch all doubts about who was responsible for the Samjhauta Express blasts of February 2007 that killed about 70 people, US has approached the UN to get a certain Asif Kasmani declared an international terrorist.

The reasons cited by US to get Kasmani, a Pakistani national, declared an international terrorist are his involvement in the Samjhauta Express blasts.

Kasmani is considered to be the link between Laskar-e-Toiba and Al Qaida. Though India had blamed the Samjhauta Express blasts on elements from Pakistan, the latter has strenuously denied any connection to the incident.

Much later, a goof-up by the prosecution in the Malegaon blast case raised some doubts about the involvement of Abhinav Bharat plotter Lt Col Srikant Purohit, bringing an Hindutva terror element into play. This had given Pakistan a handle, claiming that terror events are routinely blamed on it while the "Hindu" angle was ignored.
US names Pak man for blasts on Samjhauta - The Times of India

you may also want to read this:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/strate.../21759-us-names-pak-man-blasts-samjhauta.html

yes that is very true. US coming up with a name after three years and without givin any evidence solves the whole case? even if you assume that wat they say is true, involvement of a pakistani person does not negate indian involvement.
police had said that the bags in which explosives were hidden, were bought in the indian city indore. and suspects had been seen at the Indian station. if leT is involved, how did they bought the bags in India and then placed the explosive filled bags on the train in an Indian train station under all the Indian security apparatus?

why prohit was not charged is bec investigation was never allowed to proceed in that direction. many things left the main screen after karkares mysterious death.

ignoring all that, my argument still remains that we should not allow such incidents to take our relationship as hostage to it. it will lead us to no where by allowing those, who dont want peace, more room to manoeuvre.

 

[gurjot]

ignoring all that, my argument still remains that we should not allow such incidents to take our relationship as hostage to it. it will lead us to no where by allowing those, who dont want peace, more room to manoeuvre.

dudi reality is this kind of incidents really affect the relations.both things cant happen,only one can take place. or now

 

[ajpirzada]

dudi reality is this kind of incidents really affect the relations.both things cant happen,only one can take place. or now

at least we did not put an end to composite dialogue after samjhota express. and that is wat india should have done. but upto u. its not just we who are getting effected.

 

[Goodperson]

India knows making peace and friendship with Pakistan will never stop terrorism. Terrorism is not limited to one Particular nation.

 

[Gin ka Pakistan]

^^^ you have to start from some were

 

[ajpirzada]

India knows making peace and friendship with Pakistan will never stop terrorism. Terrorism is not limited to one Particular nation.

ok. im sure indian gov is much clever than u r.

and yes there is no doubt terrorism is not limited to one particular nation which is one gud reason for everyone to not let the peace talk derail.

 

[pmukherjee]

India knows making peace and friendship with Pakistan will never stop terrorism. Terrorism is not limited to one Particular nation.

Hahahaha, Goodperson, it is like saying that if Mr A gave Mr B a kick then Mr B should make friends with Mr A to stop him from kicking. Amazing logic dont you think?

There is another logic to it, let us all kick and we will see who the last man standing is. Make sense?

Post really not aimed at you buddy. All due regards to fellow countrymen.

 

[Goodperson]

ok. im sure indian gov is much clever than u r.

and yes there is no doubt terrorism is not limited to one particular nation which is one gud reason for everyone to not let the peace talk derail.

What composite talks ? That too after Mumbai attacks ? India has not yet finished trials of even the live evidence.

 

[Gin ka Pakistan]

Hahahaha, Goodperson, it is like saying that if Mr A gave Mr B a kick then Mr B should make friends with Mr A to stop him from kicking. Amazing logic dont you think?

There is another logic to it, let us all kick and we will see who the last man standing is. Make sense?

Post really not aimed at you buddy. All due regards to fellow countrymen.

what about 1971 kick by Indians its still need to be answered or should be forgiven by friendship with India.
Man even Bush didn't had that much ego and confidence when he said "bring it on" then Indians have.

 

[HariSeldon]

yes that is very true. US coming up with a name after three years and without givin any evidence solves the whole case? even if you assume that wat they say is true, involvement of a pakistani person does not negate indian involvement.

Are you saying that Asif K. was on Indian Payroll?

police had said that the bags in which explosives were hidden, were bought in the indian city indore. and suspects had been seen at the Indian station. if leT is involved, how did they bought the bags in India and then placed the explosive filled bags on the train in an Indian train station under all the Indian security apparatus?

why prohit was not charged is bec investigation was never allowed to proceed in that direction. many things left the main screen after karkares mysterious death.

Not only US charged so, UN accepted the charges. Do you mean even UN is wrong? Pls chk the original press release regarding UN.

TG-192: Treasury Targets Al Qaida and Lashkar-E Tayyiba Networks in Pakistan

We all know how difficult it was for India to get PK based org banned by UN because of China. Than why it went through?

ignoring all that, my argument still remains that we should not allow such incidents to take our relationship as hostage to it. it will lead us to no where by allowing those, who dont want peace, more room to manoeuvre.

Pls don't ignore that. You are equating 2 incident. One where PK citizen(s) are charged and convicted for terrorism causing death f IN & PK citizen. Other incidence involved 10 PK citizens involved in terrorism causing death of IN citizens and ppl from other nationalties.
IN is asking to act against the terror infra targeted at IN. This is not in your priority list. So IN has droped CD from is priority list.
Its not the act but the will to not allowing those perpetrating these act that has stalled the dialogue.

 

[HariSeldon]

Double post

 

[pmukherjee]

what about 1971 kick by Indians its still need to be answered or should be forgiven by friendship with India.
Man even Bush didn't had that much ego and confidence when he said "bring it on" then Indians have.

I hear guys crying hoarse about 3 million Afghan Refugees and how that impoverished a nation, have you ever heard of the 10 million refugees who came to India from Bangladesh.....oops... East Pakistan, because their brothers from the west were busy raping, looting and murdering them? No I think not.

 

[ajpirzada]

What composite talks ? That too after Mumbai attacks ? India has not yet finished trials of even the live evidence.

so? if samjhota express did not put an end to composite talks then why should mumbai?

 

[ajpirzada]

Are you saying that Asif K. was on Indian Payroll?

and how am i supposed to comment on that when no serious investigation took place?

Not only US charged so, UN accepted the charges. Do you mean even UN is wrong? Pls chk the original press release regarding UN.

US says and UN does it. wats the big deal about that.

We all know how difficult it was for India to get PK based org banned by UN because of China. Than why it went through?

to let some diplomatic pressure off us. imagine if we had stopped UN from banning JuD?

Pls don't ignore that. You are equating 2 incident. One where PK citizen(s) are charged and convicted for terrorism causing death f IN & PK citizen. Other incidence involved 10 PK citizens involved in terrorism causing death of IN citizens and ppl from other nationalties.
IN is asking to act against the terror infra targeted at IN. This is not in your priority list. So IN has droped CD from is priority list.
Its not the act but the will to not allowing those perpetrating these act that has stalled the dialogue.

no serious investigation took place to find the reality behind sumjhota attacks. ur police had said that the bags in which explosives were hidden, were bought in the indian city indore. and suspects had been seen at the Indian station. if leT is involved, how did they bought the bags in India and then placed the explosive filled bags on the train in an Indian train station under all the Indian security apparatus? so to me it was an attack on pakistanis in india in which pakistanis died. in mumbai attack indians and few other foreign national died. how is it any different? do u expect me to give more weightage to a life of US citizen?