What's new

India must continue to hold siachin

Paan Singh

BANNED
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
7,636
Reaction score
0
New Delhi: Against the backdrop of Pakistani push for demilitarisation of Siachen, Army Chief Gen Bikram Singh on Wednesday made it clear that the Indian military would not like to move out of the "strategically important" icy heights for which a "lot of blood has been shed".

He said the Army has conveyed its views to the Government which has to take a final decision in this regard.

"It is very important and we must continue to hold that area and we have held that view always.... We have lost our lives and lot of blood has been shed to get into these areas and occupy the heights and positions.

"These positions are of strategic importance and we have given our concerns to the Government and now it is for the Government to decide," Gen Singh said in a media interaction.

He was responding to a query on India's stand on the Siachen issue. Pakistan has been pushing for demilitarisation of Siachen but India has maintained that this cannot take place without proper authentication by both sides of the present troop positions on the Glacier.

Asked if the Army believed that the Glacier has to be held under control then why the talks were being held, he said, "The negotiations are at government level and at the national level. Let us see, how these negotiations progress but we have given our point of view."

Gen Singh said the Army has not changed its views on the importance of the strategic heights which have been under Indian physical control since 1984 after the Army launched to Operation Meghdoot to occupy them.

Asked how much flexible India was willing to be on the issue, he said it was discussed during the 13th round of Defence Secretary-level talks held in Islamabad.

"This is one of the issues supposed to have been discussed and it was not concluded at that point of time and I think it will carry forward. I think modalities have to be worked out during the dialogue to be held next year."

Pakistan Army Chief Gen Pervez Kiyani had recently made another pitch for the demilitarisation of the Glacier after losing over 100 soldiers in Gyari there in an avalanche.
 
. . . .
Army is not going anywhere but my only fear is traitor M.F. congress...

I agree with you, bhai. These treacherous "liberal" vermin have infinite capacity to trade the country off for political gains. The party's first traitor aka Nehru exhibited this capacity in full extravagance when he was willing to donate Ladakh to Mao. Because of that scumbag's policies, we nearly got our rears handed in 62 war as well and had it not been the Army and the local volunteers, we Sikkimese would be speaking Chinese today. :angry:

Puppy G today may not be in control but that witch Maino and her puppet MMS would do anything for political gains. Country is not relevant for them.
 
.
their is not even a question of leaving siachin ,so where do the need of discussion arises

govt. cant even think of that, not even upa its a political end (suicide).
 
. . . .
no, even line if line is demarcated, the army will come down to a comfortable position but will not leave siachen

Ok, General.

Over n Out

P.S. : Pak will never agree on demarcation as that means acceptance of LOC at that position. If that happens that will be an "Mission Accomplished" scenario for Indian army.
 
. . . . .
Cant trust when the next group of 'jihadis' takes over those peaks. If we let that happen, we'd be spitting on the graves of the good men that died, keeping the territory protected.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom