What's new

India is the Last BRIC standing

If you had the intellect to understand,which you sadly don't going by your reputation on this forum as well as your behaviour,I would.So it would be a case of pearls before swine or creepy dogs.

This word is not mention in any historical text of India/Bharat, so how will we know the meaning of geographic expression or subcontinent, may be skyrocketing high IQ Chinese know it, you ask them. ;)
 
.
india should be kicked out from brics. it has worst econimical fator among all member, in terms of total or per capital gdp, yet creating biggest noise. Those indian working style only hamper brics's cooperation.

Go ahead genius...who's stopping you.
 
.
This word is not mention in any historical text of India/Bharat, so how will we know the meaning of geographic expression or subcontinent, may be skyrocketing high IQ Chinese know it, you ask them. ;)

India never existed in history.

It is a British creation, out of the many independent kingdoms of the subcontinent.
 
.
Wrong. :lol:

Why don't you come to China and ask them yourself?

They are Chinese nationals now, tell me in the historical sense, did Tibetans, Mongols or Jurchens consider themselves as Chinese in 221BC. :rofl::rofl::rofl:

I read that Manchus used to live in extreme terror after the fall of Qing dynasty and started to pretend as Han Chinese and because of that terror their language got extinct in few decades.
 
Last edited:
.
LOL officially accepted name of India is Bharata.. your lies are busted :P
Yeah right,everyone uses "bharat" to refer to India.Everyone.:lol:
I am convinced.After all everyone refers to you guys as tech support curry bharatians and not tech support curry Indians.
I bet even the name bharat could be traced to invaders naming their conquered lands like the aryans or any other groups that have trampled Indians since as long as anyone could remember.
 
.
India has the 2nd largest Muslim population in the world, soon to be number 1.

Sounds like the next Partition of India is inevitable. :azn:

British creations are falling apart all over the world, look at Sudan, look at Iraq/Syria (much of their landmass is now IS territory). There is no reason to think that India who started the trend in 1947, could somehow survive with the 2nd largest Muslim population in the world, and a mass murderer of Muslims (Modi) ruling over them.
people republic of china came in 1949. We are older than you guys by margin of 2 years :P
and your country is based on qing dynasty which was not ethnic chinese. Either let the manchus rule you guys again or say bye-bye to current china because hans were never been able to rule the entire territory of present day china.
 
.
This word is not mention in any historical text of India/Bharat, so how will we know the meaning of geographic expression or subcontinent, may be skyrocketing high IQ Chinese know it, you ask them. ;)
You are just proving my pearls before swine assertion even further.Go on.
 
. .
India never existed in history.

It is a British creation, out of the many independent kingdoms of the subcontinent.

a united China never existed before 1950, your historical China was just a Han homeland in eastern corner of modern China like this.

qin-dynasty-great-wall-map.gif
 
.
India has the 2nd largest Muslim population in the world, soon to be number 1.

Sounds like the next Partition of India is inevitable. :azn:

British creations are falling apart all over the world, look at Sudan, look at Iraq/Syria (much of their landmass is now IS territory). There is no reason to think that India who started the trend in 1947, could somehow survive with the 2nd largest Muslim population in the world, and a mass murderer of Muslims (Modi) ruling over them.
China was unified by a mass murderer called Mao so its obvious that China will fall apart in the future.
India was founded in 1947 when the Indian rulers and the Indians of the different Indian kingdoms voluntarily
entered the Indian Union. So unlike the Chinese who were threatened and were forced to accept the PRC as
their masters the Indians decided on their own to enter the Indian Union.
 
Last edited:
.
people republic of china came in 1949. We are older than you guys by margin of 2 years :P
and your country is based on qing dynasty which was not ethnic chinese. Either let the manchus rule you guys again or say bye-bye to current china because hans were never been able to rule the entire territory of present day china.

Like I said, Manchus are Chinese. Come here and ask them yourself. :lol:

Whereas ask Abotani or jamahir or mujaihind if they call themselves Indian? None of them do.

Natural countries will tend to have demographic ethnic majorities, see the example of Britain which despite decades of mass immigration, is still 90% white British.

The artificial British creations on the other hand, have no dominant ethnic group, that's why like India in 1947, they split. Same with North and South Sudan, and Iraq and Syria with IS controlling vast amounts of their territory (de facto split). They are falling apart like clockwork.

Now the mass murderer of Indian Muslims Modi is lording over the 2nd largest Muslim population in the world.

In the future, Indian members like Atobani, jamahir and mujaijind will be actively promoting their "new nationalism" after Partition 2.0 has come and gone.
 
.
China was unified by a mass murder called Mao so its obvious that China will fall apart in the future.
India was founded in 1947 when the Indian rulers and the Indians of the different Indian kingdoms voluntarily
entered the Indian Union. So unlike the Chinese who were threatened and were forced to accept the PRC as
their masters the Indians decided on their own to enter the Indian Union.
do you know 65 million people died in that great leap forward :eek:
 
. .
Like I said, Manchus are Chinese. Come here and ask them yourself. :lol:

Whereas ask Abotani or jamahir or mujaihind if they call themselves Indian? None of them do.

Natural countries will tend to have demographic ethnic majorities, see the example of Britain which despite decades of mass immigration, is still 90% white British.

The artificial British creations on the other hand, have no dominant ethnic group, that's why like India in 1947, they split. Same with North and South Sudan, and Iraq and Syria with IS controlling vast amounts of their territory (de facto split). They are falling apart like clockwork.

Now the mass murderer of Indian Muslims Modi is lording over the 2nd largest Muslim population in the world.

In the future, Indian members like Atobani, jamahir and mujaijind will be actively promoting their "new nationalism" after Partition 2.0 has come and gone.
Anti-Qing sentiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
even we don't hate mughals that much :lol:
 
.
. .
Yeah right,everyone uses "bharat" to refer to India.Everyone.:lol:
I am convinced.After all everyone refers to you guys as tech support curry bharatians and not tech support curry Indians.
I bet even the name bharat could be traced to invaders naming their conquered lands like the aryans or any other groups that have trampled Indians since as long as anyone could remember.
word china is derived from cyna which is a sanskrit word. We gave you your identity ;)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom