The Economic History of the Last 2,000 Years in 1 Little Graph

[hatehs]

we have even the pension history for Maratha rulers and Sikh Rulers during 19th century..... no pension news of Mughal/Muslims during second half of 19th century?

Hindu logic - rapist marauders briefly terrorizing areas outside of their homeland is proof VE ARE A NATION.

 

[ThunderCat]

A human common sense. India was established in 1947. By the UK.

And it named itself after a Pakistani riverbed.

 

[ST1976]

And it named itself after a Pakistani riverbed.

there was no Pakistan before 1940s, and no Bangladesh before 1970s. but there was 'Bharat' before UK was imagined, before 1st century, post#1 of this thread.
virtually, there was only India and China, remaining were nothing till the year 1000, post#1.
.
=>
Economies before 1st century, and upto the year 1000, the 1500, 1820, the 1913, as below

More 2,000 years in a single graphic

Did JP Morgan's striking chart on 2,000 years of economic history bungle the x-axis? Why yes, it did.

www.economist.com

 

[ThunderCat]

there was no Pakistan before 1940s, and no Bangladesh before 1970s. but there was 'Bharat' before UK was imagined, before 1st century, post#1 of this thread.
virtually, there was only India and China, remaining were nothing till the year 1000, post#1.
.
=>
Economies before 1st century, and upto the year 1000, the 1500, 1820, the 1913, as below

The kingdom of Bharata did not correspond to the map of modern India. Why do I bother responding to trolls?

 

[ST1976]

There was no country by the name "India" under Muslim or British rule. The Mughal Empires borders did not correspond to the border of present-day India.

Neither did the British Raj.

India is changing its name to Bharat now:

India to be renamed as 'Bharat'? Govt may bring resolution in Parliament's special session

The Indian government is reportedly considering changing the country's official name to 'Bharat' during a special session of Parliament. The move is seen as a dig against the opposition alliance called INDIA (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance). The government is also said to be...

economictimes.indiatimes.com

Bharat or Gangestan seems more acceptable. It could be inspiration from Mr Erdogan.

look, i would say something in a different way. 'name' of a country doesn't mean, how many names a country can have. not just India but Bharat, Hindustan, bla bla has been many names of India. and the Bharat is now proposed now days....

UK/Britain in a tiny country. even Pakistan looks big brother of Britain. do they name any country? Britain are too small, very less as compared to India, China, Russia

Britain is a part of the United Kingdom alongside Northern Ireland. Just as Russia is a part of the Russian Federation alongside the regions it governs.

Britain is sized between Pakistan and Bangladesh economies. BD is LDC member which is visible while Britain is not, this is also a difference

List of countries by GDP (PPP) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ST1976]

How British colonialism increased diabetes in south Asians | It's Complicated​

Indian slave will always be a slave.

View attachment 964187

View attachment 966780

How British colonialism increased diabetes in south Asians | It's Complicated​

Indian slave will always be a slave.

View attachment 964187

"make slaves or become slaves, there is nothing in middle." 'slave' mentality people

 

[ST1976]

The same goes for Jinnah - This is what the BRITISH viceroy said about him:

What could the British viceroy possibly be arguing with him about? Pakistan. Because the British were desperate to have our homelands handed to radical Hindus in BIMARU on a golden platter. We now know that the radical Hindu line about Pakistan being a British project is false - they wanted us to be part of BHARAT to make defense arrangements in the region after they left much more simple. Your entire country has already renounced Gandhi and celebrate his killers; might as well also stop pushing their tired conspiracy theories too.

bra panty prices vary a lot even within a country
you might want to try a better example.

A human common sense. India was established in 1947. By the UK.

View attachment 965034

I doubt the source and methodology used to establish the new NIC list. I just don’t see how Thailand or Mexico could be more industrialized than Poland or even Romania, Hungary. Also what about places like Chile?

you see Chinese engineers helping projects in Pakistan and in ASEAN also, here, have you ever heard that Chinese helping India or Russia?

there are only '4' industrialized nation. here it worth saying, France with 60mil people can't build Rafale by their own, its the US. as, EU is itself nothing, similar to ASEAN.....

while US? how much 'boties' Hindus threw to US's people, is the only industrialization of US.

List of ethnic groups in the United States by household income - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

with other 3 are India, China and the Russia. 'only' 4 industrialized nation this world has, which includes the US also....

 

[Menthol]

The Economic History of the Last 2,000 Years in 1 Little Graph​

That headline is a big promise. But here it is: The economic history of the world going back to Year 1 showing the major powers' share of world GDP, from a research letter written by Michael Cembalest, chairman of market and investment strategy at JP Morgan.

https://cdn.theatlantic.com/media/mt/business/Screen Shot 2012-06-20 at 9.37.55 AM.png
View attachment 962056

In Year 1, India and China were home to one-third and one-quarter of the world's population, respectively. It's hardly surprising, then, that they also commanded one-third and one-quarter of the world's economy, respectively.

Before the Industrial Revolution, there wasn't really any such thing as lasting income growth from productivity. In the thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution, civilization was stuck in the Malthusian Trap. If lots of people died, incomes tended to go up, as fewer workers benefited from a stable supply of crops. If lots of people were born, however, incomes would fall, which often led to more deaths. That explains the "trap," and it also explains why populations so closely approximated GDP around the world.

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/06/the-economic-history-of-the-last-2-000-years-in-1-little-graph/258676/

I don't think Ancient India economy was that big.

I think India economy before British colonial era is exaggerated.

The size of Ancient India economy is the same when British arrived and slightly change when British left.

Today India culture about economy is a mirror of the past culture.

If today India is not great, then in the past India is not great.

 

[REhorror]

Asia must regain our economic might!

 

[ST1976]

To the Indian dogs who support Israel

You have only one constant in your life

And that is to boot lick your masters

View attachment 966851

i find Britain is now match to LDC countries only. a tiny country ,UK, who is now nothing without charity from countries like India, CHina, Russia
feeding on charity from India, China, Russia is now only fate of Britain-UK........
.

whatever bro.
Slums in our country still outstrip upper class streets in yours

GDP per capita isn't even something worth humiliating you on

what charity we throw to British dogs, is the only future of UK-Britain, which is written on walls. put head up and see
('we' means for India, China, Russia)

 

[ST1976]

whatever lmao

from 2016 to 2021 alone, India received well over 2 Billion pounds in aid to boost your economy and shitty living standards. We will never take aid from you as you will never be on the same level as us. 150 million people in your country still live in the direst of poverty standards seen in the history of mankind. That's over double our population

look a news as below: "a dog first beg more, and if not, then attack also. and this is truth of British dogs"

Britain embarrassed as India spurns 'peanuts'

India's Finance Minister describes aid from Britain as 'peanuts' and says it is not wanted.

www.smh.com.au

India tells Britain: We don't want your aid

India’s Finance Minister has said that his country “does not require” British aid, describing it as “peanuts”.

www.telegraph.co.uk

 

[ST1976]

The aid is "peanuts"?

That in itself means it is not enough to fix India's huge poverty and poor living standards.

Congrats, you've proven me right.

this is GDP on PPP for this year. while here, US-UK are 'hollow' economies.
on the other hand India-China type countries have a large share of 'undocumented' part of GDP
.

View attachment 966868
Largest economies in the world by PPP GDP in 2023

List of countries by GDP (PPP) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ST1976]

No, that's not what PPP means.
It means that the purchasing parity within the country is a lot higher.
This is due to the low cost of Labour and low living standards in India, which means that a lot more can be purchased for the same amount, theoretically making the average person better off on paper, but not when you have a colossal population like India.

You've again proven that India suffers from a colossal amount of poverty due to the massive value of its PPP economy within the nation and that a lot more can be bought for a lot less due to the higher value of currency to the average person.

Of course this is going to be lower in the UK where the currency value for the average person is lower due to the higher prices of commodities and services due to having a much more advanced educational and operational system, which leads to much higher competition in demand and therefore better living standards in the long run

you proved that you have very less economic knowledge, as compare to me. you are the one like those western dogs, we hindus throw 'boties', and its proved

here are those indians who run US's/Western industries, and feed US's/western people

List of ethnic groups in the United States by household income - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ST1976]

US is the sole Super Power of the world in true sense.
You attack any American ally and you will have Americans fighting with their whole might against you.
Russia,China and India have very little true-alliance building behaviour.They are mostly business oriented dealers.
They will never be able to compete US when it comes to building alliances.
And alliance is what that builds a solid block to set a world order.

China despite its military might is afraid to come out of its shell and build alliance with anti-US countries and challenge the US hegemony.
Russia is simply exhausted now.
India's approach is always careful.
They will never take risk
Typical Subcontinental behaviour.

Chinese are old buddies thanks to their one child Policy.they can't expend their men to build their influence on the world.

Russia is a giant gas station owned by oligarchs.

Russia military innovation has been close to zero post Cold War.

Russian military industrial base has been declining slowly

Educated Russians have been migrating. The population is stagnant.

we find India-Russia combined power increased consistently since 1990

here its worth saying India's relation with China, deeper than ocean and higher than sky.
and this is brics. its China, (and also Russia-Iran-Iraq), with whom India has relation, deeper than ocean and higher than sky

 

[ST1976]

No, that's not what PPP means.
It means that the purchasing parity within the country is a lot higher.
This is due to the low cost of Labour and low living standards in India, which means that a lot more can be purchased for the same amount, theoretically making the average person better off on paper, but not when you have a colossal population like India.

You've again proven that India suffers from a colossal amount of poverty due to the massive value of its PPP economy within the nation and that a lot more can be bought for a lot less due to the higher value of currency to the average person.

Of course this is going to be lower in the UK where the currency value for the average person is lower due to the higher prices of commodities and services due to having a much more advanced educational and operational system, which leads to much higher competition in demand and therefore better living standards in the long run

You should be counting GDP PER CAPITA.

Overpopulated countries like India will always rank at the top.

Compare with China, who has a similar population as yours, and look at the piss-poor gau mutra showing.

And Comparing London, Shanghai, Beijing and HongKong with Mumbai is like comparing your kaamwali bai to Aishwarya Rai.

Not even in the same league as infra, city services, convenience to access parts of the city and a hundred other things.

I know it looks good in Swarajya Mag, but come the f*ck on !!

Stay limited within India.

Don't make me post pictures of Dharavi slums - which should be enough.

how you people think of Philippines, the NIC member as below? are the countries like Philippines able to feed themselves?
here we have table of NIC, current. we find GDP on PPP per Capita of India is close to Philippines-Indonesia, have a close look on the table as below.

Newly industrialized country - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

here i would say, India-Philippines-Vietnam-China might be having similar ratio of 'undocumented' part of GDP