What's new

India is heading to repeat history in economy !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Vascoda gamma was the first european landed on India for trading as India is famous for spices.Why can't he opt to reach todays karachi or balochistan for that matter !
 
.
I really hope that India will one day realise that by improving relations with China, the rest of the world will be at the mercy of the two traditional economic hegemons.

No one would fcuk with a Chinese INdian alliance circa 2050. Too bad I am just an overly optimistic mountain gorilla and my wisdom will be disgarded like rotten bananas.

You are right.

More power to the unity of BRICS. We should stand together shoulder to shoulder.

It will take time but our support for each other in WTO for our farmers, climate change and G-20 are examples of this potential.
 
.
We are one of the oldest and only continuing civilization and your are saying India is no more than 200 years ago. Is this what is taught to Pakistan kids in school

History of India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We have rich history that is un-parallel across the world.

yeah I belong to the same history, tell us about the richness please I might have missed it
 
.
Sorry no history before 1947 for pakistan.
That land was India,bharat,bharatvarsh

The name Bharat derives from king bharata, if you take a cursory glance of king bharatas reign he barely dominated an area the size of Bangladesh in north India if that. It is his kingdom referred to by hindutvas laying a claim to antiquity to give credence and ancient India which really never was a collection of hodge podgy fiefdoms. In all of 2-3000 year history a United india was only very briefly u under Asoka, mauryas,Guptas for a few hundred years.

All roads lead to Indus Valley, mohenjadaro, Harappa, mehrgarh of which Pakistanis are rulers of that land everything else came after, and that is what burns Indians
 
.
Ashoka had extremely close attachment to Taxila aka Pakistan,So it doesn't matter even if the capital was in bihar because mughal were not from India but had the capital in india.So having the capital in the region doesn't make them indigenous to the region.

India is a dud land with the only valuable history of being ruled by foreigners on the other hand,we Pakistan stretching from Mehrgarh to Indus valley civilization has a unique and different history compared to you indians.Atleast we have a history to be proud of unlike you

Wtf?

Now I know what the grandfather paradox actually means.
 
.
With some justification, you could say that Kols, Santhals, Jarawas etc are indigenous - which is why they are called "adivasi" - original inhabitants.
Of course even they migrated from Africa 70,000 years back. All of humanity came out of Africa.
They were only handful of them and they played no significant role in creation of all these mighty Indian civilizations. Moreover i was talking about past 3000 -4000 years and was replying to Pakistani who believes that an Empire with it's Capital deep inside Indian territory belongs to them.
 
. . .
I really hope that India will one day realise that by improving relations with China, the rest of the world will be at the mercy of the two traditional economic hegemons.

No one would fcuk with a Chinese INdian alliance circa 2050. Too bad I am just an overly optimistic mountain gorilla and my wisdom will be disgarded like rotten bananas.

It's ultimately a question of time and politics. We'll have to just wait and watch how things evolve.
 
. .
Here is Indian subcontinent at night and you can clearly see the power distribution or say population distribution.Looks like no man's land in west rajasthan and pakistan part including balochistan.You can even see the border as of illumination.

india.jpg
 
.
Pakistan was existed even before Islam? Wow.

BTW, Taxila was country, thats a news for me.
...they learn different history...and rest of the world learn different history
 
.
So it doesn't matter even if the capital was in bihar because mughal were not from India but had the capital in india.So having the capital in the region doesn't make them indigenous to the region.
You even know who was Ashoka ancestors?

Maurya Empire, Chandragupta Maurya, Chanakaya, Nanda Empire? Ring a bell?
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom