India is heading to repeat history in economy !!!

[Niks]

Ashoka had extremely close attachment to Taxila aka Pakistan,So it doesn't matter even if the capital was in bihar because mughal were not from India but had the capital in india.So having the capital in the region doesn't make them indigenous to the region.

India is a dud land with the only valuable history of being ruled by foreigners on the other hand,we Pakistan stretching from Mehrgarh to Indus valley civilization has a unique and different history compared to you indians.Atleast we have a history to be proud of unlike you

Sorry no history before 1947 for pakistan.
That land was India,bharat,bharatvarsh

 

[farhan_9909]

Sorry no history before 1947 for pakistan.
That land was India,bharat,bharatvarsh

Bhai jaan apne jhoot bolnay main PHD konsi university se kia hai?zara naaam bataye

 

[Niks]

Bhai jaan apne jhoot bolnay main PHD konsi university se kia hai?zara naaam bataye

Oh bhaijaan,aap apne two nation theory ko null saabit karne me kyo lage ho ?

 

[Matrixx]

Ashoka had extremely close attachment to Taxila aka Pakistan,So it doesn't matter even if the capital was in bihar because mughal were not from India but had the capital in india.So having the capital in the region doesn't make them indigenous to the region.

India is a dud land with the only valuable history of being ruled by foreigners on the other hand,we Pakistan stretching from Mehrgarh to Indus valley civilization has a unique and different history compared to you indians.Atleast we have a history to be proud of unlike you

Madarsa historian

 

[ManavKalia]

Ashoka had extremely close attachment to Taxila aka Pakistan,So it doesn't matter even if the capital was in bihar because mughal were not from India but had the capital in india.So having the capital in the region doesn't make them indigenous to the region.

India is a dud land with the only valuable history of being ruled by foreigners on the other hand,we Pakistan stretching from Mehrgarh to Indus valley civilization has a unique and different history compared to you indians.Atleast we have a history to be proud of unlike you

Shows your lack of historical knowledge.. There's an Indus valley site near Delhi, next to Meerut..

 

[janon]

They were coined by the people of current day Pakistan.

Infact,the history of south asia generally refer to the history of Pakistan.

Current day Pakistan was part of the Indian civilization. And no, the history of S Asia is not the history of Pakistan. Mighty empires like the Cholas, Pandyas, Cheras, Rashtrakutas, Pallavas etc had nothing to do with present day Pakistan. Just because you have been fed this alternate history that the history of the subcontinent begins with Bin Qasim, don't expect others to tolerate your BS.

Present day India and Pak were equally important for the north Indian civilizations. The South Indian kingdoms and civilizations are unique to modern day India.

India is a dud land with the only valuable history of being ruled by foreigners on the other hand,we Pakistan stretching from Mehrgarh to Indus valley civilization has a unique and different history compared to you indians.Atleast we have a history to be proud of unlike you

Oh boy, do you have any idea how immensely idiotic you sound? Please do yourself a favour and read about the civilizations and empires I named before. Watch BBC's documentary about Indian history, for a start. Since they have given you the title of "research and development", its time to do some research and enlighten yourself.

 

[Lord ZeN]

Ashoka had extremely close attachment to Taxila aka Pakistan,So it doesn't matter even if the capital was in bihar because mughal were not from India but had the capital in india.So having the capital in the region doesn't make them indigenous to the region.
India is a dud land with the only valuable history of being ruled by foreigners on the other hand,we Pakistan stretching from Mehrgarh to Indus valley civilization has a unique and different history compared to you indians.Atleast we have a history to be proud of unlike you

There is nothing called indigenous Indians. Every ethnic group in India at some point in history was an invader or an immigrant. But if we consider the last 2000 years as a time frame for reference then no significant Empire was established from the present day Pakistan as it's capital... Thus Pakistan can't claim any of these mighty empires as theirs.

 

[janon]

There is nothing called indigenous Indians. Every ethnic group in India at some point in history was an invader or an immigrant. But if we consider the last 2000 years as a time frame for reference then no significant Empire was established from the present day Pakistan as it's capital... Thus Pakistan can't claim any of these mighty empires as theirs.

With some justification, you could say that Kols, Santhals, Jarawas etc are indigenous - which is why they are called "adivasi" - original inhabitants.

Of course even they migrated from Africa 70,000 years back. All of humanity came out of Africa.

I really hope that India will one day realise that by improving relations with China, the rest of the world will be at the mercy of the two traditional economic hegemons.

No one would fcuk with a Chinese INdian alliance circa 2050. Too bad I am just an overly optimistic mountain gorilla and my wisdom will be disgarded like rotten bananas.

Actually that is bound to happen, as it has been for millennia. I don't know about "hegemony", but India and China will dominate the world economically and culturally. You should know that there is no real hatred between Indians and Chinese, like there is between India and Pak or China and Japan. The disputes we have are only about some territory and borders. There is no people to people hatred.

 

[Shamain]

Yea india is heading for a history repeat. Just as in past the hindus always surrendered in subjugation without fighting this time again they will do the same ,when Pakistan will attack and takeover entire india.

 

[Mr.Nair]

Shows your lack of historical knowledge.. There's an Indus valley site near Delhi, next to Meerut..

If you check population distribution of rural pakistan, can find they occupied mostly on the banks of Indus river and rest of area especially balochistan looks like no mans land.Pakistan landscape and geography looks like a desert except northern parts.If you check India, it is almost equally distributed from north to south except thar desert in rajasthan.

 

[xyxmt]

India was powerful economy wise, but India did not invested in military hence invaders invaded India for its riches.

there was no India 200 years ago

 

[Niks]

Yea india is heading for a history repeat. Just as in past the hindus always surrendered in subjugation without fighting this time again they will do the same ,when Pakistan will attack and takeover entire india.

Someone just talked about surrender ???????

1971

there was no India 200 years ago

Nah....you are wrong in 1498 Vasco-Da-gama found the sea route to "INDIA"

 

[Mr.Nair]

there was no India 200 years ago

But there is pakistan from 5000 BC

 

[Dash]

Ashoka had extremely close attachment to Taxila aka Pakistan,So it doesn't matter even if the capital was in bihar because mughal were not from India but had the capital in india.So having the capital in the region doesn't make them indigenous to the region.

India is a dud land with the only valuable history of being ruled by foreigners on the other hand,we Pakistan stretching from Mehrgarh to Indus valley civilization has a unique and different history compared to you indians.Atleast we have a history to be proud of unlike you

Have you finished school ?

 

[ito]

there was no India 200 years ago

We are one of the oldest and only continuing civilization and your are saying India is no more than 200 years ago. Is this what is taught to Pakistan kids in school

History of India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We have rich history that is un-parallel across the world.