What's new

India has almost wiped out extreme poverty: International Monetary Fund

Surya 1

BANNED
Joined
Aug 6, 2016
Messages
5,120
Reaction score
-53
Country
India
Location
India

India has almost wiped out extreme poverty: International Monetary Fund​

In India, the number of people living in extreme poverty -- defined by the World Bank as living on US$1.9 or less in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms -- was 0.8% of the population in the pre-pandemic year 2019, stated the IMF paper, published on April 5, 2022.




file-photo-international-monetary-fund-logo-seen_e1b65fb6-1414-11eb-b504-c4c734a23405_1649312936408.jpg
India has almost wiped out extreme poverty, says IMF(REUTERS)
Updated on Apr 07, 2022 05:40 PM IST

ByZia Haq
New Delhi: India has almost eradicated extreme poverty and brought down consumption inequality to its lowest levels in 40 years through state-provided food handouts, according to a new working paper published by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
The IMF working paper -- authored by economists Surjit Bhalla, Arvind Virmani and Karan Bhasin -- said that the proportion of people living in extreme poverty, at less than 1%, remained steady even during the pandemic on the back of “in-kind” subsidies, especially food rations.


The study comes at a time when several recent global reports have pointed to the widening gap between the rich and poor in Asia’s third-largest economy, while studies on the economic shocks of the Covid-19 pandemic vary in their conclusions.

In India, the number of people living in extreme poverty -- defined by the World Bank as living on US$1.9 or less in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms -- was 0.8% of the population in the pre-pandemic year 2019, stated the IMF paper, published on April 5, 2022.

Food rations were “instrumental” in ensuring that extreme poverty did not increase and “remained at that low level” in the pandemic year 2020, the study found. PPP is a metric that equalises the buying power of different currencies to make comparisons easy.
Our results also demonstrate the social safety net provided by the expansion of India’s food subsidy program absorbed a major part of the pandemic shock,” the authors stated. Such back-to-back low poverty rates suggest India has eliminated extreme poverty, they concluded.

Also read:

What sets their study apart, according to the authors, is the effect of subsidy adjustments on poverty. The results are “striking”, they said in the working paper. Food handouts curbed poverty by acting like “cash transfers”.

IMF states that its working papers describe research in progress, and are published to elicit comments.

Real (inflation-adjusted) inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient, which stands at 0.294, is now very close to its lowest level 0.284 observed in 1993-94, the paper stated. The Gini coefficient ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 representing perfect equality and 1 representing perfect inequality.

The food subsidy is 5kg per person. In terms of a household, that would be about 25 kg a month. Now if you convert that into prices, that would come to about ₹750. This is not an insignificant amount for really poor households,” said Pronab Sen, former chief statistician of India.

“But I cannot imagine ₹750 changing the inequality part of it. Absolute poverty in terms of hunger…yes, but inequality is a different ballgame. ₹750 is just not enough to move the needle on inequality,” Sen added.

Also read: Why IMF praised PM Modi’s food security scheme during pandemic

Most previous studies and measures of poverty and inequality did not account for the role of food handouts, the paper’s authors noted. “These (new) estimates include, for the first time, the effect of in-kind food subsides on poverty and inequality,” the paper stated.

 
. . . . .
Article has already explained it. Article is on the IMF study.
Do you know who wrote that report?

"Surjit Bhalla never fails to amaze one with his imaginative rendition of otherwise boring and clinical economics. For starters, Surjit is known or understood differently to different people: a “reputed economist”, a “pro-Modi economist”, someone who “looks for a dog who did not bark”, an economist “who molests poverty data”, to just sample a few.


For the record: He is the executive director for India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Bhutan at the International Monetary Fund (IMF). He was also a part-time Member of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister (of India) before resigning from the position in December 2018.


His latest paper Pandemic poverty and Inequality: Evidence from India has been published on the IMF website under the ‘IMF Working Paper’ section. Such papers are supposed to elicit comments and discussions, and as IMF has reiterated, views expressed in this paper “do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its executive board, or IMF management.”



 
. . . . . .

India has almost wiped out extreme poverty: International Monetary Fund​

In India, the number of people living in extreme poverty -- defined by the World Bank as living on US$1.9 or less in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms -- was 0.8% of the population in the pre-pandemic year 2019, stated the IMF paper, published on April 5, 2022.




file-photo-international-monetary-fund-logo-seen_e1b65fb6-1414-11eb-b504-c4c734a23405_1649312936408.jpg
India has almost wiped out extreme poverty, says IMF(REUTERS)
Updated on Apr 07, 2022 05:40 PM IST

ByZia Haq
New Delhi: India has almost eradicated extreme poverty and brought down consumption inequality to its lowest levels in 40 years through state-provided food handouts, according to a new working paper published by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
The IMF working paper -- authored by economists Surjit Bhalla, Arvind Virmani and Karan Bhasin -- said that the proportion of people living in extreme poverty, at less than 1%, remained steady even during the pandemic on the back of “in-kind” subsidies, especially food rations.


The study comes at a time when several recent global reports have pointed to the widening gap between the rich and poor in Asia’s third-largest economy, while studies on the economic shocks of the Covid-19 pandemic vary in their conclusions.

In India, the number of people living in extreme poverty -- defined by the World Bank as living on US$1.9 or less in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms -- was 0.8% of the population in the pre-pandemic year 2019, stated the IMF paper, published on April 5, 2022.

Food rations were “instrumental” in ensuring that extreme poverty did not increase and “remained at that low level” in the pandemic year 2020, the study found. PPP is a metric that equalises the buying power of different currencies to make comparisons easy.
Our results also demonstrate the social safety net provided by the expansion of India’s food subsidy program absorbed a major part of the pandemic shock,” the authors stated. Such back-to-back low poverty rates suggest India has eliminated extreme poverty, they concluded.

Also read:

What sets their study apart, according to the authors, is the effect of subsidy adjustments on poverty. The results are “striking”, they said in the working paper. Food handouts curbed poverty by acting like “cash transfers”.

IMF states that its working papers describe research in progress, and are published to elicit comments.

Real (inflation-adjusted) inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient, which stands at 0.294, is now very close to its lowest level 0.284 observed in 1993-94, the paper stated. The Gini coefficient ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 representing perfect equality and 1 representing perfect inequality.

The food subsidy is 5kg per person. In terms of a household, that would be about 25 kg a month. Now if you convert that into prices, that would come to about ₹750. This is not an insignificant amount for really poor households,” said Pronab Sen, former chief statistician of India.

“But I cannot imagine ₹750 changing the inequality part of it. Absolute poverty in terms of hunger…yes, but inequality is a different ballgame. ₹750 is just not enough to move the needle on inequality,” Sen added.

Also read: Why IMF praised PM Modi’s food security scheme during pandemic

Most previous studies and measures of poverty and inequality did not account for the role of food handouts, the paper’s authors noted. “These (new) estimates include, for the first time, the effect of in-kind food subsides on poverty and inequality,” the paper stated.



Are you sure or very sure or very very sure then what next? Indians living on the Mars and taking their dogs for a walk??
 
.
Are you sure or very sure or very very sure then what next? Indians living on the Mars and taking their dogs for a walk??

The next stage of removal of hunger poverty is walking on Mars? Where have you studed? Re-education camp school?
 
.
The next stage of removal of hunger poverty is walking on Mars? Where have you studed? Re-education camp school?
With super powa like India who are masters of farts and love to dance to the rhythm of the Bollywood with bru like no other anything is possible.
Actually I studied in the top Universities of your master country which used to stick notices on their doors in your country which used to state "Indians and dogs are not allowed".
 
.
India is too large and varied to be captured by such studies.
City Indians , including me, have no idea how the poor live in remote villages.
No Indian has to sleep hungry with the Number of government and ngo schemes and organisations devoted to providing aid.
But access and knowledge about these schemes will vary across regions.
I have family members working full time with slum kids and never heard them complain about lack of resources.
The major issue is of parents not sending kids to free schools , especially girls.
India has more than enough resources to make every Indian live like a lower middle class individual. Whats lacking is effective last mile implementation
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom