That is because you see everything with your green tinged glasses. Only if you really understand the others perspective, could you objectively see that it is not.
I don't want to repeat all the crap about CAA/NRC again, I may have repeated that 100 times, I am tired of it. You can go and enjoy your Hindu Rashtra.
What Hindu Rashtra? Your kind of unreasonableness is the problem in this country. I am done with your nonsense.
There is so much material on internet about NRC, if you're really interested then follow Aakar Patel on twitter. I am not going to repeat that here. And yes this country is becoming a Hindu Rashtra.
What NRC? There is no NRC yet. And Aakar patel is a known anti-modi baiter/paid journalist. I could understand criticism but I mean it takes a special kind of anti national to write anti-modi tirades in the enemy press (read Dawn) for a few bucks. Good luck if you are following him.
Polytheistic religious faith allows Indians to respect (for the most part) the right of people from minority faith to exist and practice their faith with an acceptable degree of freedom. It does not put Indians above lynching and religious/casteist violence. These remain isolated incidents in a poor and overpopulated country with limited resources. It is not really comparable with a real civil war without a national or provincial government. I’m not trying to rationalize discrimination and barbaric violence as understandable. Only trying to make a point that the polytheistic nature of Hindu faith has been (and continues to be) a saving grace.
Ad hominem.
Changez Khan, Roman polytheists, Greek Colonisers disagree
Still follow someone who is balanced in criticism otherwise you'll be consumed in hatred. Good luck.
There you are incorrect. For the Sangh, a patriotic Muslim has to especially curse Pakistan four times a day. That is the Sangh's measure of patriotism.
The Sangh is not really a gentle, Humanist movement to be concerned about Muslims and Christians in India, and others generally outside of India. Not criticizing the US government is OK for the Sangh despite the US government being a neo-imperialist power that has destroyed so many countries around the world.
Let it come to the floor of the house. Then I'll join you in the protests.
People like Nehru or Savarkar have had some significance in public opinion. But their influence on public acceptance or rejection of secularism was not absolute. It takes generations for societies to form a practice of cultural tolerance. This cannot be easily credited to a few individuals.
No body gives a fcuk about manusmriti. We are not bookish people but experential people.
No, leaders can do much more than you assume. Leaders can convert entire nations, where are you?
Sangh do. Look at the above Hindu Mahasabha statement.
