Sankpal
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 1,972
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
Doklam is your biggest achievement LOLOLOL
No..... it was just trailer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doklam is your biggest achievement LOLOLOL
We believed the same way, china can't block our water if they will do then world will know but china must know first.. example what happened in doklam.
Perfect solution... even airlift could be a immediate option as only 30% of Indus water actually come from China rest all is added from tributaries originating from India.
No..... it was just trailer.
Great idea.. we should also divert all water from Jammu & Kashmir rivers to Eastern Indian state's...
China is not known for being so generous about giving water to satisfy one country's grudge over the other.Posted like a true ignorant. Why airlift, it can be diverted. I doubt your 30% claim but even if 30%, it is huge. Chinese part bordering Kashmir and Pakistan have more ice, therefore when melted will add more water into indus.
As long as their are no wars. At least when alt right is ruling.You are bound by IWT
China hasn't cannot pause a serious threat by blocking water. The life lines of India originate in Nepal gets larger while passing through India.Chinese doesn' have any treaty with you.
China is not known for being so generous about giving water to satisfy one country's grudge over the other.
As long as their are no wars. At least when alt right is ruling.
China hasn't cannot pause a serious threat by blocking water. The life lines of India originate in Nepal gets larger while passing through India.
China signing an Indus treaty with Pakistan will dilute the purpose of original IWT. Unless you want to provoke India and give reasons for us to retract from the original treaty.China and Pakistan can sign a treaty which will allow fair share for both countries.
Yes, in case of next war, India may retract from the treaty. That's the mood of the central government right now. And we have a right wing government which prefers stringiest action. While the center left congress government wouldn't touch the treaty. If you were following the recent statements you will get a wind of it.I don' know what you mean by that, please elaborate.
India cannot literally dry up Pakistan, it's mainly because of the geography. We cannot fully block the flow of rivers and construct dams around these rivers hoping that it will somehow make pakistan go water less. India is only blocking Beas, Ravi and Sutlej to some extend by constructing dams.If India can do water terrorism and dry up Pakistani land, then any country can do. Pakistan lifeline is also Indus, Chenab, Jhelum, which india continuously block by building dams and cutting water...this is against IWT.
China signing an Indus treaty with Pakistan will dilute the purpose of original IWT. Unless you want to provoke India and give reasons for us to retract from the original treaty.
Yes, in case of next war, India may retract from the treaty. That's the mood of the central government right now. And we have a right wing government which prefers stringiest action. While the center left congress government wouldn't touch the treaty. If you were following the recent statements you will get a wind of it.
India cannot literally dry up Pakistan, it's mainly because of the geography. We cannot fully block the flow of rivers and construct dams around these rivers hoping that it will somehow make pakistan go water less. India is only blocking Beas, Ravi and Sutlej to some extend by constructing dams.
Indus, Jhelum and Chenab will have a flow maintained with respect to the treaty. Even if they are dam'ed at some point.
Also, India has 20% water rights over Indus. Which we can dam and/or divert.
Oh man.If China divert Indus river towards Pakistan bypassing India, then Pakistan and China can have a treaty on that river, simple as that, nothing to do with India. Pakistan cannot be accused of disregarding IWT as that new path of Indus was not by Pakistan.
99 didn't go nuclear. Limited war is possible. Or a massive terror strike in India. Like the one in 2008 can trigger consequences. May be not a war, but retracting from IWT.Next war with India might be an end of Pakistan and non recoverable annihilation of India. Both countries might be declared nuclear wasteland by UN. So it won't mean anything anyways what happen with IWT.
India always respected the IWT, so far. Even after Kargil and 2008 attacks.That' what you are saying, but it is happening. India is building dams and the reports suggests that Pakistan will be dried up by 2025. Already massive parts of Punjab and Sindh are dried up which cannot grow crops due to shortage of water. As far as what I've ead, India is building damn on western rivers too.
Oh man.
Are you suggesting China will do this for Pakistan? They didn't even commit to a damn construction. And they will divert one entire river so that India cannot have Indus water while Pakistan can have it all? Sir you are a senior member, put some logical argument. Just FYI this is what China should do for that. Oh and these regions are mountainous terrains. Not plain fields.
View attachment 437116
99 didn't go nuclear. Limited war is possible. Or a massive terror strike in India. Like the one in 2008 can trigger consequences. May be not a war, but retracting from IWT.
India always respected the IWT, so far. Even after Kargil and 2008 attacks.
The news report is just scare mongering. Just to fuel the hate. While Pakistan is not even doing enough to save Indus water, which is running into the ocean. How many dams are on your side? You simply let it flow to the sea.
If this continues, together with the climate change and the glaciers going down. Pakistan will soon have a water crisis. While India is doing steps to interlink rivers in parts of India. Pakistan is simply sitting and complaining about India.
Of course, China will come to rescue.You can believe whatever you want. Indian blockage of Pakistani waters are fact and it is wakeup call for Pakistani ruling figures. Whether they build dams on emergency level, persuade China to divert waters or anything else, it' their choice.
Who cares about what you believe, there is enormous evidence from Indian and US investigations into 2008 attacks. They all points in one direction.And nobody in Pakistan gives a fk abt 2008 drama false flag. The loss of innocent lives is condemnable but blame game and threat doesn' work for Pakistan. That's why after you sending your troops to the border in 2008, Pakistan send it's forces too, if you want war, then let it be.
There is a price for everything in the damm world. If they r ok with what they paid with after 2008 so let it be. Let's see until when ..Of course, China will come to rescue.
Who cares about what you believe, there is enormous evidence from Indian and US investigations into 2008 attacks. They all points in one direction.
Keep living in denial.
China divert Indus river towards Pakistan bypassing India?new path of Indus?If China divert Indus river towards Pakistan bypassing India, then Pakistan and China can have a treaty on that river, simple as that, nothing to do with India. Pakistan cannot be accused of disregarding IWT as that new path of Indus was not by Pakistan.
Of course, China will come to rescue.
Who cares about what you believe, there is enormous evidence from Indian and US investigations into 2008 attacks. They all points in one direction.
Keep living in denial.
Just like America came to rescue you.
I don't need to start discussion on Mumbai attacks. It's well established with sound proof.There is only garbage from indian investigations. Nothing to do with your American master. Indian staged that drama to attack Pakistan while Pakistan was on its weakest and incidents like red mosque, assassination of bhutto, ttp terrorism was on its peak, etc...just like indians did in 71.